Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 13.05.2025
Home Issues 2020 Year Issue №2 METAPHORIZATION OF FOOD TASTE CHARACTERISTICS IN THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AND THE WORLD PICTURE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

METAPHORIZATION OF FOOD TASTE CHARACTERISTICS IN THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AND THE WORLD PICTURE

Polyakova Anastasiya Andreyevna, Yurina Elena Andreevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-2-76-84

Information About Author:

Polyakova A. A., National Research Tomsk State University (pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050). E-mail: polyakova3008@mail.ru Yurina E. A., National Research Tomsk State University (pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050), Pushkin State Russian Language Institute (ul. Akademika Volgina, 6, Moscow, Russian Federation, 117485). E-mail: yourina2007@yandex.ru

Introduction. The article is devoted to the cognitive and semasiological study of the metaphorization of taste characteristics (delicious, sweet, sour, fresh, etc.) that make up one of the significant segments of the conceptual gastronomic metaphor. Aim and objectives – to study the directions of metaphorization of figurative units motivated by adjectives with the original semantics of taste properties; to identify the bases of figurative analogies; to describe a fragment of the Russian language picture of the world presented by the system of figurative means of the language reflecting the characteristic food metaphor. Material and methods. The research material was made up of about 200 figurative lexical and phraseological units of the Russian language, reflecting the metaphorization of the properties of food products, metaphorically motivated by 15 adjectives. The study is based on the theory of the figurative structure of the language, in particular, the method of describing the lexical and semantic field is used. Results and discussion. Cognitive grounds for metaphorical characterization of various objects of reality are the nature and evaluation of sensations that occur in the subject of eating: 1) pleasant/unpleasant taste, 2) pronounced/ weakly pronounced taste, 3) high/low degree of suitability for eating. Conclusion. The figurative words and expressions, motivated by names of taste qualities, metaphorically characterize objects and phenomena of various spheres of reality: appearance, emotional state, character and behavior of a person; style and content of speech and artistic works; financial significance of economic objects; human attitude to the phenomena and events of life.

Keywords: food metaphor, figurative vocabulary, adjective metaphor, cognitive model

References:

1. Baldova A. V. Pishchevaya metafora kak sredstvo vyrazheniya otsenki i tsennostey (na materiale obraznoy leksiki i frazeologii russkogo yazyka) [Food metaphor as a means of expressing appreciation and values (based on figurative vocabulary and Russian language phraseology)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2015, no. 396, pp. 5–13 (in Russian).

2. Boychuk A. S. Gastronomicheskaya metafora v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Gastronomic metaphor in modern Russian]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarvtsvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya “Filologicheskiye nauki” – Bulletin of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University. Series “Philological Sciences”, 2010, no. 7 (61), pp. 75–79 (in Russian).

3. Grekova M. V. Obrazy posudy v russkoy metaforicheskoy kartine mira (kognitivno-diskursivnyy i leksikograficheskiy aspekty) [Images of dishes in the Russian metaphorical picture of the world (cognitive-discursive and lexicographic aspects)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudartsvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2017, vol. 2 (179), pp. 18–24 (in Russian).

4. Dormidontova O. A. Gastronomicheskaya metafora kak sredstvo kontseptualizatsii mira (na materiale russkogo i frantsuzskogo yazykov). Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Gastronomic metaphor as a means of conceptualizing the world (based on Russian and French languages). Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.] Tambov, 2011. 23 p. (in Russian).

5. Zhivago N. A. Metaforizatsiya obrazov teplovoy obrabotki pishchi v russkom yazyke [Metaphorization of images of heat treatment of food in Russian]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 32–38 (in Russian).

6. Kapelyushnik E. V. Kulinarnyy kod kul’tury v semantike obraznykh sredstv yazyka. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Culinary culture code in the semantics of figurative means of language. Diss. of cand. philol. sci.]. Tomsk, 2012. 199 p. (in Russian).

7. Kirsanova E. M. Pragmatika yedinits semanticheskogo polya “Pishcha”: sistemnyy i funktsional’nyy aspekty: na materiale russkogo i angliyskogo yazykov. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Pragmatics of the units of the semantic field “Food”: systemic and functional aspects: on the material of Russian and English languages. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Moscow, 2009. 29 p. (in Russian).

8. Kovshova M. L. Semantika i pragmatika frazeologizmov (lingvokul’turologicheskiy aspekt). Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Semantics and pragmatics of phraseological units (linguocultural aspect) Diss. doct. of philol. Sci.]. Moscow, 2009. 654 p. (in Russian).

9. Maksimova T. V. Gastronomicheskaya metafora v raznykh tipakh diskursa [Gastronomic metaphor in different types of discourse]. Vestnik LGU im. A. S. Pushkina – Vestnik of Pushkin Leningrad State University, 2013, no. 4, vol. 1, pp. 176–180 (in Russian).

10. Pomarolli J. Kontseptsiya sopostavitel’nogo lingvokul’turologicheskogo slovarya pishchevoy metafory na materiale russkogo i ital’yanskogo yazykov [The concept of a comparative linguocultural vocabulary of food metaphor based on Russian and Italian languages]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2018, no. 434, pp. 40–49 (in Russian).

11. Yurina E. A. Vkusnye metafory: pishchevaya traditsiya v zerkale yazykovykh obrazov [Delicious metaphors: food tradition in the mirror of language images]. Kokshetau, 2013. 238 p. (in Russian).

12. Yurina E. A., Zhivago N. A. Metaforizatsiya pogloshcheniya pishchi v obraznom stroye russkogo yazyka [Metaphorization of food absorption in the figurative system of the Russian language]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal. Philology, 2015, no. 3, pp. 107–121 (in Russian).

13. Natsional’nyy korpus russkogo yazyka [The Russian National Corpus]. Data of 2003–2019 (in Russian). URL: www.ruscorpora. ru. (accessed 6 August 2019).

14. Yurina E. A. Obraznyy stroy yazyka [Imagery structure of language]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 2005. 156 p. (in Russian).

15. Alefirenko N. F. Teoriya yazyka. Vvodnyy kurs: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov filologicheskikh spetsial’nostey vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy [Theory of language. Introductory course: Textbook for students of philological specialties of higher educational institutions]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2004. 368 p. (in Russian).

16. Blinova O. I. Yavleniye motivatsii slov: Leksikologicheskiy aspect [The phenomenon of motivation of words: Lexicological aspect]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2010. 208 p. (in Russian).

17. Ilyukhina N. A. Metaforicheskiy obraz v semasiologicheskoy interpretatsii [Metaphorical image in a semasiological interpretation]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2016. 321 p. (in Russian).

18. Sklyarevskaya G. N. Metafora v sisteme yazyka [Metaphor in the language system]. Saint Petersburg, Philological Department of SpbSU Publ., 2014. 166 р. (in Russian).

19. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors We Live By]. In: Arutyunova N. D. (ed.) Teoriya metafory [The theory of metaphor]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. Pp. 387–415 (in Russian).

20. Baranov A. N., Karaulov Yu. N. Russkaya politicheskaya metafora: materialy k slovaryu [Russian political metaphor: materials for a dictionary]. Moscow, Institut russkogo yazyka Publ., 1991. 193 p. (in Russian).

21. Chudinov A. P. Rossiya v metaforicheskom zerkale: kognitivnoye issledovaniye politicheskoy metafory [Russia in a metaphorical mirror: a cognitive study of political metaphor]. Ekaterinburg, UrSPU Publ., 2001. 238 p. (in Russian).

polyakova_a._a._76_84_2_208_2020.pdf ( 463.35 kB ) polyakova_a._a._76_84_2_208_2020.zip ( 456.33 kB )

Issue: 2, 2020

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: LINGUOCULTUROLOGY AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION

Pages: 76 — 84

Downloads: 1120

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU