Interpretations of the Problem “F. M. Dostoevsky and Postmodernism” in English-language Slavistics of the XXI century
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2025-1-111-118
The reception of Dostoevsky’s works in the context of postmodern literature and philosophy constitutes a promising direction in English-language Slavistics of the XXI century. Scholarly works considered belong predominantly to slavists from the USA, but are not limited to such. These studies draw upon modern literary works, influenced by F. M. Dostoevsky (Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace, Master of St. Petersburg and Diary of a Bad Year by J. M. Coetzee, and A Curse on Dostoevsky by Atiq Rahimi) and works of the Russian classic himself (The Double, The Karamazoff Brothers, and The Meek One). M. M. Bakhtin’s polyphonic theory links Dostoevsky’s works, works of contemporary authors, influenced by Dostoevsky, and postmodern prose. Concepts such as splitting into doubles, levelling of hierarchies, substitution of the authentic by simulacra, and deconstruction of religious and ethical meaning evoke special research interest. University of Macau Professor Peter Mathews (China) points out that the splitting of Yakov Golyadkin’s personality into doubles becomes one of the first examples of a shattering consciousness, common in postmodernist prose. Brown University Professor Svetlana Evdokimova (USA) claims that Dostoevsky created the first characters, who proclaimed a future era of simulacra. Professor of Purchase College Nina Pelikan Straus (USA) considers similarities between the religious beliefs of F. M. Dostoevsky and Jacques Derrida. She concludes that Bakhtin’s theory links the deconstruction of religious meaning with its unspoken affirmation in dialogue. University of Georgia Professor Alexander Spektor (USA) contrasts the protagonist of The Meek One with narrators of W. Gombrowitz’s postmodernist novels. PhD. student Michael Bowden (UK) finds a tendency towards metaphysical nostalgia in works of modern literature, influenced by Dostoevsky. Thus, such English-language studies of the XXI century exhibit two contradictory tendencies: some researchers emphasize the common ground between postmodern literature and Dostoevsky’s works; others believe the Russian classic’s legacy to offset to the breakdown of ethical and religious meaning, characteristic of postmodern literature.
Keywords: F. M. Dostoevsky, postmodernism, deconstruction, The Double, J. Derrida, J. Deleuze, R. Bart, J. Baudrillard, W. F. Wallace, J. M. Coetzee, A. Rahimi
References:
1. Wallace D. F. Joseph Frank’s Dostoevsky. Consider the Lobster and Other Essays. London, Abacus, 2014. Pp. 255–274.
2. Bowden Michael Jon. Contemporary dostoevskian literature: the post-postmodern repositioning of dostoevskian ethics in novels by David Foster Wallace, JM Coetzee and Atiq Rahimi: Dis. PhD. Leeds, 2021. 355 p.
3. Straus N. P. Dostoevsky’s Derrida. Common Knowledge, 2002, no. 8, pp. 555–567.
4. Spektor A. Between Mourning and Melancholy: Narrative Ethics in Fyodor Dostoevsky and Witold Gombrowicz. Comparative Literature, 2014, no. 66, pp. 186–207.
5. Bowden M. Shamelessness and New Sincerity: Dostoevsky, David Foster Wallace, and Trump’s America. Literature of the Americas, 2021. Pр. 155–182.
6. Dasgupta А. The Author is Dead, Long Live the Author! Postmodern Metanarrative and the Performance of the Author Function. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 2021, no. 13, pp. 1–9.
7. Evdokimova S. Dostoevsky’s Postmodernists and the Poetics of Incarnation. Dostoevsky Beyond Dostoevsky: Science, Philosophy, Religion, 2016. P. 213–235.
8. Holquist M. The Surd Heard: Bakhtin and Derrida. Literature and History: Theoretical Problems and Russian Case Studies, ed. Gary Saul Morson. Standford, Standford University Press, 1986. 258 p.
9. Lipovetsky Mark. Post-Soviet literature between realism and postmodernism. The Cambridge companion to twentieth-century Russian literature, 2011, pp. 175–193.
10. Mathews P. D. Dostoevsky’s “The Double”, Postmodernism, and the NeoBaroque. The Dostoevsky Journal, 2000, no. 1, pp. 29-42.
11. Coetzee J. M. The Master of Petersburg. New York, Penguin, 1994. 250 p.
12. Coetzee J. M. Diary of a bad year: Text classics, Melbourne, Text Publishing, 2012. 192 p.
13. Rahimi A. A. Curse on Dostoevsky: A Novel. New York, Other Press, 2014. 272 p.
14. Vonnegut K. Slaughterhouse-Five: A Novel, 1994, New York, Modern Library, 1994. 215 p.
15. Wallace D. F. Infinite Jest: a Novel. Boston, Little, Brown and Company, 1996. 1088 p.
16. Dostoevsky F. M. Brat’ya Karamazovy [The Brothers Karamazov]. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy: v 30 tomakh [Complete collection of works: 30 volumes]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1975. Vol. 14. 511 p. (in Russian).
17. Dostoevsky F. M. Dvoynik. Peterburgskaya poema [The Double: a Petersburg poem]. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy: v 30 tomakh [Complete collection of works: 30 volumes]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972. Vol. 1. 519 p. (in Russian)
18. Dostoevsky F. M. Krotkaya [A Gentle Creature]. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy: v 30 tomakh [Complete collection of works: 30 volumes]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1982. Vol. 24. 518 p. (in Russian).
19. Bakhtin M. М. Problemy poetiki Dostoyevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics]. Moscow, Eskmo Publ., 2017. 640 p. (in Russian).
20. Pshidatok A. R. Bakhtinskaya konseptsiya sobytiya y yeyo vliyaniye na sovremennuyu narratologiyu [Bakhtin’s event concept and its influence on contemporary narratology]. Noviy filologicheskiy vestnik – New Philological Bulletin, 2024, no. 2, pp. 20–31.
21. Guattari F., Gilles D. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London, Athlone Press, 2000. 632 p.
( 422.79 kB ) 
( 410.5 kB )
Issue: 1, 2025
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: RUSSIAN LITERATURE AND INTERCULTURAL LITERARY RELATIONS
Pages: 111 — 118
Downloads: 2