THE PRAGMATIC ASPECTS OF SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE (CONTENT-ANALYTICAL STUDY OF DISSERTATION HEADINGS)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-6-16-23
One of the leading directions of research in contemporary Russian and foreign linguistics is the study of discourse. In this article we are talking about a scientific discourse that differs from other types of discourse and has its clear characteristics, requirements and design. Scientific discourse, according to most researchers, is objectified, but as a sphere of human activity, it can not escape the influence of the author’s personality. The primary stage in the creation of a scientific text is the choice of a theme that reflects the title of the text, i.e. already at this stage a pragmatic aspect may appear. Creating the scientific text, the author puts his subjective view, evaluation on the subject of research, also focuses on the reader who will perceive the text, and therefore the position and opinion of the author of the text, agreeing with it or not agreeing, but provoking a reaction and receiving a response to the text. To test this hypothesis, a content analysis of theses on the specialty “General History (of the corresponding period)” was conducted for the period from 1980 to 2010 and revealed the relationship between the choice of the topic of the dissertation and the socio-political situation.
Keywords: pragmatics of scientific text, pragmatic aspect, historiographic source, thesis abstract, content analysis
References:
1. Mishankina N. A. Metafora v nauke: paradoks ili norma? [A metaphor in science: a paradox or a norm?]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 2010. 282 р. (in Russian).
2. Kun T. Srtuktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy [Structure of scientific revolutions]. Moscow, 1975. 300 p. (in Russian).
3. Fuko M. Arkheologiya znaniya [Archeology of knowledge]. Kiev, 1996. 208 р. (in Russian).
4. Stepin V. S. Istoriya i fi losofi ya nauki [History and philosophy of science]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt; Triksta Publ., 2011. 384 р. (in Russian).
5. Kozhina M. N. Stilistika russkogo yazyka [Stylistics of the Russian language]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1993. 932 р. (in Russian).
6. Pierce Ch. S. Kak sdelat’ nashi idei yasnymi [How to make our ideas clear]. Voprosy fi losofi i, 1996, no. 12, pp. 120–132 (in Russian).
7. Ladyzhnikova V. I. Tematicheskoye razvertyvaniye i pragmaticheskoye fokusirovaniye v nauchnom tekste [Subject deployment and pragmatic focusing in a scientifi c text]. Vestnik BFU im I. Kanta – IKBFU’s Vestnik. Ser. Philology, Pedagogy and Psychology, 2010, no. 2, pp. 65–70 (in Russian). URL: http://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/6bf/aobrbwyaswbnmrxahkqaor%20oc.lq._65-70.pdf (accessed 18 February 2018).
8. Mishankina N. A. Pragmatika nauchnogo diskursa [Pragmatics of scientifi c discourse]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – The Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Вulletin, 2015, no. 2, pp. 126–133 (in Russian).
9. Mozhaeva G. V., Mishankina N. A. Kontent-analiz istoriografi cheskogo istochnika (k voprosu o mezhdistsiplinarnosti lingvisticheskikh metodov) [Content analysis of a historiographical source (on the interdisciplinarity of linguistic methods)]. Vestnik TGU. Seriya: Literaturovedeniye i yazykoznaniye – Vestnic TSU. Ser. Literature Studies and Linguistics, 2007, no. 294, pp. 52–61 (in Russian).
10. Ankersmit F. Narrative Logic: A Semantic Analyses of the Historian Language. The Hague, 1983. Pр. 226–229.
11. Valgina N. S. Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk. Sintaksis [The modern Russian language. Syntax]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 2003. 528 p. (in Russian).
12. Kvadratura smysla: frantsuzskaya shkola analiza diskursa: per. s fr. i portug. [Area of meaning: French school of discourse analysis: translation from French and Portuguese]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1999. 416 p. (in Russian).
13. Broom L., Reece S. Political and Racial Interest: A Study in Content Analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 1995, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5–19.
14. Baranov A. N. Vvedeniye v prikladnuyu lingvistiku [Introduction to applied linguistics]. Moscow, Corona Editorial URSS Publ., 2001. Pp. 252–281 (in Russian).
15. Mishankina N. A., Zilberman N. N. Vostochnoslavyanskiye yazyki v refl eksii naivnogo nositelya yazyka (kontent-analiticheskoye issledovaniye kommunikatsii internet-soobshchestv) [East Slavic languages in the refl ection of a naive native speaker (content-analytical study of the social networks communication)]. Rusin, 2017, no. 2 (48), pp. 78–98. DOI: 10.17223/18572685/48/7 (in Russian).
( 1.83 MB ) 
( 1.65 MB )
Issue: 6, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF RUSSIAN STUDIES
Pages: 16 — 23
Downloads: 1009