TYPE OF ARGUMENTATION AS A REFLECTION OF PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL AND MEDIA LANGUAGE PERSONALITY’S IDIOSTYLE
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-4-21-30
Introduction. Well-reasoned discourse is still one of the most widespread in up-to-date media sphere. It is conditional on peculiarities of modern social and historical age context and necessity to prove different viewpoints on current events. That is why study of types and means of argumentation is one of the topical task in different spheres of knowledge. The aim of the article is the detection of idiostyle peculiarities of media discourse of a public language personality abreast of argumentation’s types in the sphere of different informational reasons that are used by this person. Methods of research are based on discursive, semantic and stylistic analysis usage supported by regulative theory as one of the directions of the communicative stylistics of the text. Results and discussion. Dependence of types of argumentation that were used by public media persons on objective factors (informational reason, theme, speech genre) and subjective (goal-setting, communicative and cognitive, cultural and speech author’s peculiarities) is determined. Common and individual regulative means, structures and ways, which are typical for argued discourse and for analyzed individual discursive practices, are revealed in the article. The typical regulative structures and means of regulation are the following: usage of opponent’s quotations with further denial; reference to opponent and appeal to him that is attended by direct or indirect characteristic; reference to facts and quantitative data, usage of comparison of similar signs for proof, intensification of expression and polemic excitement at level of language means. Individual peculiarities of argumentation are the following: difference of author’s intentions, scale of informational reasons for counter-argumentation; choice of argumentation type subject to personality’s idiostle including his cultural and speech, cognitive and communicative styles, availability of author’s regulative means of logical and/or rhetorical argumentation in media discourse. Conclusion. The introduced approach to the study of argumentative discourse from the point of view of the idiostyle manifestation of a public language personality, revealed the difference between argumentation types according to the aim, means and effect of influence, which is caused not only by objective factors, but author’s individual peculiarities and information field of media text authors. These findings are of interest for media linguistics, theory of speech influence, speech conflict study, communicative stylistics of text.
Keywords: communicative stylistics of text, regulative theory, argumentative discourse, types of argumentation, idiostyle, public informational and media language personality, informational field of language personality
References:
1. Ivanov L.Yu. Argumentatsiya [Argumentation]. Kul’tura russkoy rechi: Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’-spravochnik. Pod red. L. Yu. Ivanova, A. P. Skovorodnikova, E. N. Shiryaeva i dr. [Russian speech culture: Encyclopaedic dictionary-reference. Edit. by L. Yu. Ivanov, A. P. Skovorodnikov, E. N. Shiryayev et al.]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2003. Pp. 80-83 (in Russian).
2. Trosheva T. B. Argumentativnyy tip rechi: dokazatel’stvo [Argumentative type of proof]. Stilisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Pod red. M. N. Kozhinoy [Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of the Russian language. Edit. by M. N. Kozhina]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2003. P. 20 (in Russian).
3. Kopnina G. A. Argumentatsiya [Argumentation]. Effektivnoye rechevoye obshcheniye (bazovye kompetentsii): slovar’-spravochnik. Pod red. A. P. Skovorodnikova [Effective speech communication (basic competence): dictionary-reference. Edit. by A. P. Skovorodnikov]. Krasnoyarsk, Siberian Federal University Publ., 2012. Pp. 65–67 (in Russian).
4. Gavrishina I. N. Lingvisticheski orientirovannye kontseptsii argumentatsii [Linguistically oriented argumentation conceptions]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 2018, no. 12 (90), part 1, pp. 90–104 (in Russian).
5. Grigor’yeva V. S. Argumentativnyy diskurs v kognitivno-kommunikativnom aspekte [Argumentative discourse in cognitive and communicative aspect]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki – Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2008, no. 1(014), pp. 24–31 (in Russian).
6. Goodin R.E. Manipulatory politics. Yale U.Pr. N.Haven: L., 1980. 250p.
7. Ducrot O. Opérateurs argumentatifs et visée argumentative. Cahiers de linguistique française. Genève, 1982, no. 5, pp. 83–98.
8. Levinson S. Pragmatics. Cambridge, University Press, 1983. 420 p.
9. Dem’yankov V. Z. Argumentiruyushchiy diskurs v obshchenii (Po materialam zarubezhnoy lingvistiki) [Argumentative discourse in communication (On the materials of foreign linguistics)]. Rechevoye obshcheniye: problemy i perspektivy [Speech communication: problems and prospectives]. Мoscow, 1983. Pp. 114–131 (in Russian).
10. Dem’yankov V. Z. Effektivnost’ argumentatsii kak rechevogo vozdeystviya [Efficiency of argumentation as speech influence]. Problemy effektivnosti rechevoy kommunikatsii [Problems of speech communication efficiency]. Мoscow, 1989. Pp. 13–40 (in Russian).
11. Lentz J. D. Effective handling of manipulating persons. Thomas, С.C. 1989. 100 p.
12. Baranov A. N. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya argumentatsii (kognitivnyy podkhod). Avtoref. dis. … dokt. filol. nauk [Linguistic theory of argumentation (cognitive approach). Abstract of thesis of doct. of philol. sci.]. Мoscow, 1990. 48 p. (in Russian).
13. Ivanov L. Yu. Argumentatsiya v funktsional’nykh raznovidnostyakh yazyka [Argumentation in functional types of language]. Kul’tura russkoy rechi i effektivnost’ obshcheniya [Culture of Russian speech and efficiency of communication]. Мoscow, Naukа Publ., 1996. Pp. 357–375 (in Russian).
14. Ivin A. A. Osnovy teorii argumentatsii [Basis of argumentation theory: textbook]. Мoscow, Vlados Publ., 1997. 352 p. (in Russian).
15. Moskvin V. P. Argumentativnaya ritorika: teoreticheskiy kurs dlya filologov [Argumentative rhetoric: theoretical course for philologists]. Rostov-on-Don, 2008. 637 p. (in Russian).
16. Argumentatsiya v publitsisticheskom tekste (zhanrovo-stilisticheskiy aspekt): uchebnoye posobiye. Pod red. L. M. Maydanova [Argumentation in journalistic text (genre and stylistic aspect): tutorial. Ed. by L. M. Maydanova]. Sverdlovsk, Ural State University Publ., 1992. 244 p. (in Russian).
17. Tertychnyy A. A. Analiticheskaya zhurnalistika: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov vuzov [Analytical journalism: tutorial for high school students]. Moscow, Aspekt Progress Publ., 2010. 352 p. (in Russian).
18. Oshchepkova N. A. Strategii i taktiki v argumentativnom diskurse: pragmalingvisticheskiy analiz ubeditel’nosti rassuzhdeniya (na materiale politicheskikh debatov). Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Strategies and tactics in argumentative discourse: pragmatic and linguistic analysis of cogency reasoning (study of political debates). Abstract of thesis cand. of phil. sci.]. Kaluga, 2004. 18 p. (in Russian).
19. Kosmodem’yanskaya V. I. Strategii i taktiki v argumentativnom polemicheskom diskurse [Strategies and tactics in argumentative polemic discourse]. Politicheskaya lingvistika – Political linguistics, 2016, no. 1 (55), pp. 99–103 (in Russian).
20. Duskayeva L. R. Analiticheskaya rechevaya deyatel’nost’ zhurnalista [Analytical speech activity of journalist]. Medialingvistika v terminakh i ponyatiyakh: slovar’-spravochnik. Pod red. L. R. Duskayevoy [Medialinguistics in terms and notions: dictionary-reference. Ed. by L. R. Duskayeva]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2018. Pp. 179–188 (in Russian).
21. Kormilitsina M. A., Sirotinina O. B. Idiostil’ L. Radzikhovskogo: avtorskaya pozitsiya i sredstva eyo realizatsii [Idiostyle of L. Radzikhovskiy: author’s position and means of its implementation]. Lingvistika rechi. Mediastilistika [Linguistics of speech. Medialinguistics]. Мoscow, 2012. Pp. 344–376 (in Russian).
22. Bolotnov A. V. Tekstovaya deyatel’nost’ kak otrazheniye kommunikativnogo i kognitivnogo stiley informatsionno-mediynoy yazykovoy lichnosti [Textual activity of informational and media language personality as a reflection of its communicative and cognitive styles]. Tomsk, Tomsk TsNTI Publ., 2015. 274 p. (in Russian).
23. Bolotnova N. S. Regulyativnost’ v publichnom argumentativno-polemicheskom mediadiskurse informatsionno-mediynoy yazykovoy lichnosti [Regulativity in public argued and polemic discourse of informational and media language personality]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 7 (172), pp. 138–145 (in Russian).
24. Bolotnova N. S., Bolotnov A. V., Kamneva N. V., Kashirin A. A., Kur’yanovich A. V., Pushkareva I. A. Yazykovaya lichnost’ i mediasreda: kommunikativno-kognitivnye aspekty vzaimodeystviya. Pod red. N. S. Bolotnovoy [Language personality and media sphere: communicative and cognitive aspects pf collaboration. Edited by N. S. Bolotnova]. Tomsk, Tomsk TsNTI Publ., 2017. 248 p. (in Russian).
25. Sidorov E. V. Problemy rechevoy sistemnosti [Problems of speech system]. Мoscow, 1987. 140 p. (in Russian).
26. Bolotnova N. S., Babenko I. I., Baklanova E. A., Bolotnov A. V., Vasil’eva A. A. et al. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: leksicheskaya regulyativnost’ v tekstovoy deyatel’nosti. Pod red. N. S. Bolotnovoy [Communicative stylistics of text: lexical regulativity in textual activity. Ed. by N. S. Bolotnova]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2011. 492 p. (in Russian).
( 431.66 kB ) 
( 422.07 kB )
Issue: 4, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: CURRENT PROBLEMS OF RUSSIAN SUDIES AND COMMUNICATIVE STYLISTICS OF THE TEXT
Pages: 21 — 30
Downloads: 829