FORMATION OF A LITERARY TYPE OF SPEECH CULTURE FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS THROUGH PERSONAL REFLECTION
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-5-46-52
Introduction. The article discusses the possibility of forming a literary type of speech culture of undergraduates with the help of personal reflection, which allows students to realize themselves as a linguistic person, identify and analyze models of communicative behavior and the possibility of changing them. At the same time, the experience of conflict between the established way of speech behavior and its change in order to improve communication is not suppressed, but exacerbated and leads to the mobilization of the resources of the linguistic personality to achieve the solution of communicative tasks. Personal reflection performs the function of self-determination of the individual in the process of realizing that communication as a sphere of human existence can change and thereby affect the quality of attitudes in society. The author substantiates the need to actualize the reflexive mechanism in learning as a key quality of the bearer of the literary type of speech culture, according to the classification of O. B. Sirotinina, I. A. Sternin. Aim and objectives. Analysis of the influence of the factor of personal reflection in teaching on improving the level of speech culture of university students. Material and methods. Further, the article presents the educational and methodological experience of the formation of the literary type of speech culture of undergraduates in the course of studying the discipline «Speech culture of academic and professional interaction». The examples of practical work with students to improve the communicative qualities of speech as components of speech culture through introspection are described. Based on the analysis of the value attitude of students to the communicative qualities of speech and the classification features of the carriers of the literary type of speech culture, the problematic aspects of its formation are identified. Results and discussion. The result of the study is the identification of the most vulnerable places in the formation of speech culture: these are such significant qualities of speech as purity and expressiveness. The main factor in the violation of the purity of speech is the loyal attitude of students to obscene language. The article describes the experience of changing the attitude towards the use of invectives in the course of reflection. Analysis of the use of obscene language in the personal language practice of students, its functions in speech and the negative impact on communication changes the attitude towards the use of foul language, leads to an understanding of the need for its limited use. Violation of purity, in turn, is associated with a violation of the expressiveness of speech. An important understanding of the need to develop this quality becomes, firstly, students’ awareness of the influence of expression and imagery of speech on the addressee, and secondly, understanding the individuality of the image as an expression of the speaker’s personality, personal experiences, feelings, impressions. Conclusion. The article concludes that an important task of using reflection is the task of self-development, the identification of personal language problems and speech deficiencies and the possibility of working with them in the future in order to form a literary type of speech culture.
Keywords: speech culture, reflection, linguistic personality, communicative qualities of speech
References:
1. Sirotinina O. B. Ustnaya rech’ i tipy rechevykh kul’tur [Oral speech and types of speech cultures]. Rusistika segodnya, 1995, no. 4, pp. 17–27 (in Russian).
2. Khoroshaya rech’ [Good speech]. Edited by O.B. Sirotinina. Saratov, SGU Publ., 2003. 360 p. (in Russian).
3. Sternin I. A. K teorii rechevykh kul’tur nositelya yazyka [On the theory of native speaker speech cultures]. Voprosy psikholingvistiki – Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2009, no. 9, pp. 22–29 (in Russian).
4. Bol’shoy psikhologicheskiy slovar’ [Big psychological dictionary]. Edited by B. G. Meshcheryakov, V. P. Zinchenko. Moscow, Prime-Evroznak Publ., 2007. 370 p. (in Russian).
5. Stetsenko I. A. Pedagogicheskaya refleksiya: teoriya i tekhnologiya razvitiya. Dis. dokt. ped. nauk [Pedagogical reflection: theory and technology of development. Diss. doct. ped. sci.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2006. 381 p. (in Russian).
6. Karpov A. V., Skityayeva I. M. Psikhologiya refleksii [Psychology of reflection]. Moscow, IP RAN Publ., 2002. 250 p. (in Russian).
7. Orlov Yu. M. Voskhozhdeniye k individual’nosti: kniga dlya uchitelya [Ascent to individuality: teacher book]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1991. 287 p. (in Russian).
8. Psikhologiya obshcheniya [Psychology of communication]. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Edited by A. A. Bodalev. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2011. 287 p. (in Russian).
9. Slobodchikov V. I. Individual’noye soznaniye i refleksiya [Individual consciousness and reflection]. Refleksiya v nauke i obuchenii [Reflection in science and learning]. Novosibirsk, 1984. Pp. 118–121 (in Russian).
10. Golovin B. N. Osnovy kul’tury rechi [Fundamentals of speech culture]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1988. 320 p. (in Russian).
11. Pesotskaya S. A. Uchebnyy modul’ “Logicheskiye zakony’ i oshibki” v strukture lektsionno-prakticheskogo kursa dlya magistrantov “Pedagogicheskaya kommunikatsiya” (na russkom yazyke) [The training module “Logical laws and errors” in the structure of the lecture and practical course for undergraduates “Pedagogical Communication” (in Russian)]. Razvitiye pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya v Rossii (21–26 yanvarya 2019): materialy II Vserossiyskoy nauchno-metodicheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem [Development of pedagogical education in Russia (January 21–26, 2019): materials of the II Russian national scientific and methodological conference with international participation]. Executive editor E. V. Grebennikova. Tomsk, Tomsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2019. Pp. 213–118 (in Russian).
12. Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Edited by V. N. Yartseva. Institut yazykoznaniya AN SSSR. Moscow, Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya Publ., 1990. 682 p. (in Russian).
13. Sternin I. A. Problema skvernosloviya [The problem of obscenity]. Voronezh, Istoki Publ., 2011. 21 p. (in Russian).
14. Shokov N. N. Obraznaya rech’: spetsifika i semanticheskiy mekhanizm [Figurative speech: specificity and semantic mechanism]. Filologicheskiye nauki: voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philology. Theory and Practice, 2017, no. 4 (70), pаrt 1, pp. 188–191 (in Russian).
15. Skovorodnikov A. P., Kopnina G. A. Obraznost’ [Imagery]. Stilisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary]. Edited by M. N. Kozhina. Moscow, Flinta; Nauka Publ., 2003. Pp. 255–257 (in Russian).
16. Kratkoye soderzhaniye rasskaza “Tolstyy i tonkiy” A. P. Chekhov [A summary of the story “Fat and Thin” AP Chekhov] (in Russian). URL: https://jiyuu.su/kratkie-soderzhaniya/tolstyj-i-tonkij-kratkij-pereskaz (accessed 20 June 2021).
17. Skazhenik E. N. Delovoye obshcheniye [Business communication]. Taganrog, TRTU Publ., 2006. 180 p. (in Russian).
( 390.1 kB ) 
( 383.76 kB )
Issue: 5, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: THEORY AND METHODS OF TEACHING
Pages: 46 — 52
Downloads: 604