FORECASTING CHANGES IN TEACHERS’ PREPARATION TO INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION IN REGIONS
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2022-5-58-66
Introduction. The article indicates the relevance of the problem of changes in the process of teachers’ training for intercultural interaction in a region. The authors identified the key tasks, the solution of which will help in the further design of a predictive model for the development of the teacher training system. The aim of the research is to substantiate the stages of designing a predictive model for preparing teachers for intercultural interaction. Material and methods. The leading methods of the current research is the analysis of theoretical literature. The choice of such research approaches as structural and structural-functional make it possible to characterize the process of preparing teachers for intercultural interaction as multicomponent, multilevel and multistage in the context of interaction between the regional education system and the system of higher education in the Russian Federation. Results and discussion. The stages of designing a predictive model for preparing teachers for intercultural interaction are proposed, the essence of the concepts of “training teachers” and “changes in training” is substantiated, strategies for organizing the training of teachers for intercultural interaction are indicated (overcoming the existing linearity, practice orientation and continuity and strategies for advanced learning). Moreover, the authors of the current research analyze the role of the factors that affect the process of teachers’ training for intercultural interaction. Thus, socio-political factors determine a new understanding of the strategy for the development of higher pedagogical education in the context of strengthening ethno-cultural processes (legislation in the field of regional policy development, the position of the state in the field of regulating ethnic processes and the dissemination of ideas for the preservation of ethnic cultures; growth of ethnocultural processes). Regional factors determine the specificity of the region development (the demographic structure of the population, social mobility, dynamically changing requirements of the labor market). Personal factors explain the necessity of correction and the new aims development in higher pedagogical education within the specificity of ethno-cultural diversity (the readiness of teachers for intercultural interaction; pedagogical initiatives, a framework program for teachers’ training to intercultural interaction). Conclusion. Based on the study, it was suggested that the result of the next study should be the development of components of a predictive model for preparing teachers for intercultural interaction.
Keywords: regional education, intercultural interaction, changes in teachers’ training, the strategies of educational process development, comparative researches, predictive model
References:
1. Kurylo O. V. Sovremennoye mul’tikul’turnoye obrazovaniye [The modern multicultural education]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy koferentsii “Aktual’nye problemy sovremennoy nauki: vzglyad molodykh uchenykh” [The materials of the International scientific and practical conference “The current problems of the modern science: the young scientists view”]. 2019. P. 234–240 (in Russian).
2. Palatkina G. V. Mul’tikul’turnoye vospitaniye molodezhi v prostranstve Rossii [Multicultural education of youngsters in Russia]. Astrakhan, Astrakhan University Publ., 2007. 172 p. (in Russian).
3. Pevzner M. N. Pedagogitsheskoye obrazovaniye v Germanii: perspektivy i reformy [Pedagogical education in Germany: perspectives and reforms]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye: istoriya, problemy, perspektivy [Pedagogical education: history, problemy, and perspectives]. Velikiy Novgorod, Yaroslav – the-wise Novgorod State University Publ., 1998. 232 p. (in Russian).
4. Stenishcheva A. A. Vliyaniye mul’tikulturalizma na obrazovaniye [Multiculturalism and its influence on education]. Vestnik Mariyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Vestnik of the Mari State University, 2020, vol. 14, no. 3 (39), pp. 312–319 (in Russian).
5. Averkin V. N. Teoretichsekiye problemy regionalizatsii obrazovaniya [Theoretical problems of regionalization in education]. Novgorod, Novgorodskiy regional’nyy Tsentr razvitiya obrazovaniya Publ., 1998. 64 p. (in Russian).
6. Akhizer A. S. Sotsiokul’turnaya metodologiya razvitiya rossiyskogo obschestva. Zasedaniye 1. Spetsifika sottsiokul’turnykh issledovaniy [Sociocultural methodology of the Russian society development]. Rubezhi, 1995, no. 5, p. 15 (in Russian).
7. Pisareva S. A., Triapitsyna A. P. Sovremennyye metodologicheskiye podkhody k issledovaniyu pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [The current pedagogical approaches to pedagogical education research]. Chelovek i obrazovaniye – Man and Education, 2014, no. 3 (40), pp. 4–12 (in Russian).
8. Lazareva A.V. University and social collaborations during a pandemic sustaining educational opportunity and reinventing education: a book review. Journal of Language and Education, 2021, Vol. 7 (4), pp. 198–203. URL: https://doi.org/10.17323.jle.2021.13456
9. Polyakova O., Galstyan-Sargsyan R. Sustainable higher education via telecollaboration: improving pluringualand plucultural competence. Integration of Education, 2021, vol. 25 (4), pp. 544–561. URL: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.105.25.202104.544-561
10. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod v pedagogicheskom obrazovanii [Competence approach in a pedagogical education]. Ed. V. A. Kozareva, N. F. Rodionova. Saint Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University Publ., 2004. 391 p. (in Russian).
11. Bazhina I. A. Stanovleniye i razvitiye printsipa regionalizatsii obrazovaniya v pedagogisheskoy teorii i praktike [Formation and development of regionalization in education in pedagogical theory and practice]. Kazan, Kazan State University Publ., 2003. 144 p. (in Russian).
12. Vladimoriva S. A. Upravleniye regionalizatsiey v usloviyakh intensifikatsii integratsionnykh protsessov. Avtoref. dis. kand. econ. nauk [Regionalization control and integration processes. Abstract of thesis cand. econ. sci.]. Kazan, 2008. 24 p. (in Russian).
13. Bogoslovskiy V. I. Nauchnoye soprovozhdeniye obrazovatel’nogo protsessa v pedagogicheskom universitete: metodologicheskiye kharakteristiki [Scientific supervision of the educational process in a pedagogical university: methodological characteristics]. Saint Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University Publ., 2000. 142 p. (in Russian).
14. Glumova Ye. P. Regional’nyy aspekt mezhkul’turnoy kommunikatsii [Regional aspect of multicultural communication]. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya – Problems of Modern Education, 2017, no. 6, pp. 92–104 (in Russian).
15. Horizontal Learning – Engaging Freedom’s Possibilities by Doug Reeler, from CDRA Annual Report 2004/2005 – www.cdra.org.za
16. Khristoforova S. V. Model’ regionalizatsii obrazovaniya dlya ustoychivogo razvitiya (na primere Zabaykal’ya) [The model of regionalization and sustainable education development (on the example of Transbaikal)]. Materialy Mezhregional’noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Vzaimodeystviye nauki, biznesa i obshchestva kak faktor razvitiya regionov” [The materials of interregional scientific and practical conference «Interaction of science, business and society as the factor of regions development»]. Chita, 2019. P. 265–271 (in Russian).
17. Zhukova T. A., Schrenk M. Printsip regionalizatsii v razvitii vysshego obrazovaniya v mul’tikul’turnom obshchestve [The principle of regionalization and the higher education development in multicultural society]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy koferentsii “Aktual’nye problemy estestvenno-nauchnogo i matematicheskogo obrazovaniya” [The materials of international scientific and practical conference “The current problems of Natural science and mathematical education”]. 2016. P. 151–159 (in Russian).
18. Banks J. An Introduction to Multicultural Education. New York: University of Washington. Seattle, 2008. 164 p.
19. Lysenko V. G. Kontseptualnye osnovy operezhaushchey professional’noy podgotovki dlya sottsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona [Conceptual basics of life-long professional training for social and economic region development]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2021, vol. 1 (35), pp. 97–103 (in Russian).
20. Piskunova Ye. V. Sotsiokul’turnaya obuslovlennost’ izmeneniy professional’no-pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti uchitelya [Sociocultural specificities and changes in teacher’s pedagogical and professional activity]. Saint Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University Publ., 2005. 324 p. (in Russian).
21. Vulfson B. L. Sravnitelnaya pedagogika: istoriya i sovremennye problemy [Comparative pedagogy. History and current problems]. Moscow, URAO Publ., 2003. 232 p. (in Russian).
22. Vulfson B. L. Metody sravnitel’no-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniy [The methods of comparative pedagogical researches]. Pedagogika, 2002, no. 2, pp. 70–80 (in Russian).
23. Campbell A., Converse Ph., Miller W. Stokes D. N. Y. The American Voter, 1960. 221 p.
24. Golenkova O. V., Sverdlova G. A. Regional’nyy opyt modernizatsii obrazovaniya [Regional experience of modernization in education]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy koferentsii “Diskurs sotsial’nykh problem v sottsiokul’turnom, obrazovatel’nom, yazykovom prostranstve v period pandemii koronavirusa” [The materials of international scientific and practical conference “The discourse of social problems in a sociocultural educational language environment in a pandemic period”]. Bryansk, 2021. P. 381–390 (in Russian).
25. Knyazeva V. A., Solov’yeva K. S. Tendentsii i zakonomernosti innovatsionnogo razvitiya vysshego obrazovaniya na regionalnom urovne [The tendencies and regularities of innovative development of higher education in a regional level]. Materialy III Vserossiyskoy nauchno-praktisheskoy konferentsii “Sovremennye problemy upravleniya i tekhnologii ikh resheniya v usloviyakh transformatsionnykh vyzovov” [The materials of the third Russian scientific and practical conference “The current problems of management and the technologies of its solution within transformative challenges”]. 2020. P. 350–354 (in Russian)
( 799.23 kB ) 
( 782.74 kB )
Issue: 5, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: HIGHER EDUCATION
Pages: 58 — 66
Downloads: 472