The way to distinguish between continuous, hyphenated and separate spelling of geographical names
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2023-6-77-84
The article deals with the difficulties associated with the spelling of geographical names. The spelling problems of writing toponyms that are available at the present stage of language development are identified, which are associated with a large number of geographical names with different structural organization, and with the influence of extralinguistic factors on the spelling of the toponym. In addition, the difficulties of applying some of the current recommendations on the spelling of toponyms are revealed. The object of the study is the distinction between continuous, hyphenated and separate spelling of toponymic units. The “Rules of Russian spelling and punctuation” recorded in the reference book are analyzed. Complete academic reference book” spelling rules that govern the spelling of a toponym; at the same time, the signs underlying the named rules and the difficulties associated with their application are revealed. Based on the results of the analysis of the linguistic content of spelling rules, an attempt is made to create a procedure for determining the choice of a continuous, hyphenated or separate design of a toponym. The proposed algorithm is based on the algorithmic course “Russian Spelling and Punctuation” by A. B. Selezneva, which is used at Volgograd State University when studying the spelling of the modern Russian language. The algorithm is divided into four parts and has a hierarchical structure, that is, the solution of the spelling task is performed from simple to complex: first of all, it is proposed to determine or exclude features that affect the spelling of a word, which, as a rule, do not cause difficulties, and then move on to identifying more complex criteria. The last stage involves working with units for which there are no clear recommendations, that is, toponyms that do not comply with the current language norms are analyzed. The content of the rules governing the choice of toponym spelling is included in the formulations of the spelling tasks of the algorithm, which involve the identification of formal elements in the structure of a geographical name, the location of the components that make up a linguistic unit, and the presence of certain word-building elements. The relevance of the work is due to the fact that in the presence of unresolved problems of spelling of toponyms associated with the specifics of geographical names and, as a result, with their codification, a clearly structured algorithm for distinguishing between continuous, hyphenated or separate spelling of geographical names is proposed.
Keywords: orthographic norm, toponym, orthogram, merged spelling, hyphenated spelling, algorithm
References:
1. Superanskaya A. V. Chto takoye toponimika? [What is toponymy?]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1985. 185 p. (in Russian).
2. Arutyunova E. V., Beshenkova E. V., Ivanova O. E. Propisnyye i strochnyye bukvy v geograficheskikh administrativno-territorial’nykh nazvaniyakh: akademicheskiye pravila russkoy orfografii [Uppercase and lowercase letters in geographic administrative-territorial names: academic rules of Russian spelling]. Voprosy onomastiki – Problems of onomastics, 2020, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 256–277 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2020.17.2.027
3. Barandeyev A. V. O pol’ze novoy redaktsii “Pravil russkogo pravopisaniya dlya orfografii toponimov” [On the benefits of the new edition of “The Rules of Russian spelling for the spelling of toponyms”]. In: Barandeev A. V. (Executive editor). Voprosy geografii. Sbornik 132. Sovremennaya toponimika: sbornik statey pamyati E. M. Pospelova [Questions of geography. Collection 132. Modern toponymy: collection of articles in memory of E. M. Pospelov]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2009, pp. 207–214 (in Russian).
4. Barandeyev A. V. Spetsifika otrazheniya nekorrektnogo statusa geograficheskikh ob’’yektov v orfografii toponimov [The specifics of reflecting the incorrect status of geographical objects in the spelling of toponyms]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole – Russian Language at School, 2022, no. 83 (4), pp. 92–97 (in Russian). DOI: 10.30515/0131-6141-2022-83-4-92-97
5. Morozova M. N. Protsedura prisvoyeniya ofitsialnoy formy nazvaniyam geograficheskikh ob’’yektov [Procedure for assigning an official form to names of geographical object]. Voprosy geografii. Sb. 132. Sovremennaya toponimika: sbornik statey pamyati E. M. Pospelova. Otvetstvennyy redaktor A. V. Barandeyev [Questions of geography. Collection 132. Modern toponymy: collection of articles in memory of E. M. Pospelov. Responsible editor A. V. Barandeev]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2009, pp. 262–276 (in Russian).
6. Sidorova E. G. Trudnosti kodifikatsii geograficheskikh nazvaniy v russkom yazyke (na primere slitno-defisnykh napisaniy) [Difficulties in Codifying Geographical Names in Russian (on the Example of merged-separate spelling)]. Grani poznaniya, 2015, no. 6 (40), pp. 102–106 (in Russian).
7. Arutyunova E. V., Beshenkova E. V., Ivanova O. E. Lingvisticheskiye osnovy sovremennogo napisaniya toponimov (k teorii orfograficheskogo pravila) [Linguistic foundations of modern spelling of toponyms (on the theory of spelling rule)]. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya: Literatura i yazyk – Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language, 2021, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 21–41 (in Russian).
8. Dambuyev I. A. Propisnaya i strochnaya bukvy v ofitsial’noy toponimii Rossii [Capital and lowercase letters in the official toponymy of Russia]. Voprosy onomastiki – Problems of Onomastics, 2020, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 278–302. DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2020.17.2.028 (in Russian).
9. Il’in D. Yu. Upotrebleniye propisnoy bukvy v toponimii (problema sovershenstvovaniya orfograficheskoy normy) [The use of capital letters in toponymy (the problem of improving the spelling norm)]. Volgograd, VolGU Publ., 1999. 148 p. (in Russian).
10. Il’in D. Yu., Sidorova E. G. Variativnost’ yazykovoy normy pri funktsionirovanii toponimov: problemy i protivorechiya [Variability of the language norm in the functioning of toponyms: Problems and contradictions]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Yazyk i literatura – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature, 2020, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 615–632 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21638/spbu09.2020.408
11. Il’in D. Yu., Sidorova E. G. Normy orfografii kak komponent toponimicheskoy politiki [Spelling norms as a component of a toponimic policy]. Trudy instituta russkogo yazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova – Proceedings of the V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, 2021, no. 3, pp. 121–132 (in Russian).
12. Barandeyev A. V. Aktual’nyye problemy orfografii toponimov [Current problems of spelling of toponyms]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole – Russian Language at School, 2019, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 85–90 (in Russian). DOI: 10.30515/0131-6141-2019-80-6-85-90
13. Pravila russkoy orfografii i punktuatsii. Polnyy akademicheskiy spravochnik [Russian spelling and punctuation rules. Complete Academic Handbook]. Ed. V. V. Lopatin. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007. 480 p. (in Russian).
14. Selezneva A. B. Russkaya orfografiya i punktuatsiya. Algoritmizirovannyy kurs [Russian spelling and punctuation. Algorithmic course]. Volgograd, Volgogradskiy universitet Publ., 1994. 106 p. (in Russian).
15. Verbitskaya L. A. Davayte govorit’ pravil’no [Let’s talk right]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1993. 144 p. (in Russian).
16. Beshenkova E. V., Ivanova O. E. Teoriya i praktika normirovaniya russkogo pis’ma [Theory and practice of standardization of Russian writing]. Moscow, LEKSRUS Publ., 2016. 424 p. (in Russian).
17. Barandeyev A. V. Istoriya toponimov-sovetizmov [History of toponyms-sovietisms]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole – Russian Language at School, 2017, no. 11, pp. 53–57 (in Russian).
( 445.52 kB ) 
( 431.31 kB )
Issue: 6, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: RUSSIAN LANGUAGE
Pages: 77 — 84
Downloads: 335