N. Gogol’s story “The Overcoat” in the receptive consciousness of the turn of the XX–XXI centuries. Article 1
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2024-4-136-145
The interest to Gogol’s literature heritage in the literature era of the XX–XXI centuries has been noted by many researchers. Literature scholars are actively introducing into scientific circulation the works of modern authors. They allow to raise the question of the place and role of Gogol’s heritage in the aesthetic search of the literature process of the turn of the XX–XXI centuries. The aim of the study is to analyze the functioning principles of the novel “The overcoat” and its system-forming image of a small man in the works of writers of the turn of the XX–XXI centuries. The novelty of the study lies, firstly, in the comprehension of the material that has not been previously analyzed, and secondly, in the reconstruction of the types, methods and function of the reception of the “overcoat text” in the literary era of the XX–XXI centuries. The works of modern authors were used as material: the chapter “Little Man Tetelin” from V. Makanin’s novel “The Underground or the Hero of Our Time” (1998). Makanin’s novel “The Underground, or the Hero of Our Time” (1998), stories by V. Petsukh “To Nikolai Vasilievich. Demonstration of Possibilities” from the collection “Plagiarism” (2001) and O. Slavnikova’s “CHANEL No. 5” (2009). The selected works belong to different aesthetic and genre forms and the point of convergence between them is their dialogical reinterpretation of the stylistic system of the novel “The Overcoat”, built on the combination of two modes of narration – “mimicry of grief” and “mimicry of laughter” (B. Eichenbaum). It is proved that the stylistic organization of the narrative principles of the novel “The overcoat” has a modeling effect on the works. All three selected authors use direct quotation allusion to the text of Gogol’s novel. The “overcoat plot” is projected by V. Makanin and V. Petsukh to comprehend the fate of the Soviet intelligentsia in the post-soviet realities. The writers record and comprehend the spiritual degradation aand grinding f the Soviet intellectual as a social and anthropological type. O. Slavnikova’s principles of transformation of the “overcoat plot” are connected with the reflection on the ontological value and self-sufficiency of the individual, which are lost in the situation of blurring the boundaries between the material and the ideal, man and thing. The human deformation discovered and explored by Slavnikova is thought of as an unmotivated fundamental property of the world. All three authors are characterized by the actualization of Gogol’s laughter, where the comic and the tragic coexist.
Keywords: N. V. Gogol, “Overcoat”, little man, V. Makanin, V. Pietsukh, O. Slavnikov
References:
1. Nemzer A. S. Zamechatel’noye desyatiletiye russkoy literatury [A wonderful decade of Russian literature]. Moscow, Zakharov Publ., 2003. P. 79–108 (in Russian).
2. Nemzer A. C. Sovremennyy dialog s Gogolem [Contemporary dialogue with Gogol]. Novyy mir, 1994, no. 5, pp. 208–225 (in Russian).
3. Chernyak M. A. S Gogolem na druzheskoy noge: yubileynye zametki [With Gogol on friendly terms: anniversary notes]. Znamya, 2009, no. 6 (in Russian). URL: https://znamlit.ru/publication.php?id=3943 (accessed 16 March 2024).
4. Rybal’chenko T. L. Chelovek pishushchiy i chelovek zhivushchiy v povesti N. V. Gogolya “Shinel’” i rasskaze M. Shishkina “Urok kalligrafii” [The person writing and the person living in the story by N. V. Gogol’s “The Overcoat” and M. Shishkin’s story “Calligraphy Lesson”]. N. V. Gogol’ i slavyanskiy mir (russkaya i ukrainskaya retseptsiya): sbornik statey [N. V. Gogol and the Slavic world (Russian and Ukrainian reception): collection of articles]. Tomsk, 2008. Vol. 2. Pp. 329–340 (in Russian).
5. Bal V. Yu. Obraz Chichikova v sovremennoy russkoy proze [The image of Chichikov in modern Russian prose]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2017, no. 49, pp. 147–168 (in Russian).
6. Bal V. Yu. Plyushkinskiy syuzhet v romane O. Slavnikovoy “Strekoza, uvelichennaya do razmerov sobaki” [Plyushkinsky plot in the novel by O. Slavnikova “Dragonfly, enlarged to the size of a dog]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2019, no. 60, pp. 104–132 (in Russian).
7. Rybalchenko T. L. Telesnyy diskurs kak istochnik fantasticheskogo v rasskazakh Yu. Buydy: problema gogolevskogo vliyaniya [Bodily discourse as a source of the fantastic in the stories of Yu. Buida: the problem of Gogol’s influence]. N. V. Gogol’ i slavyanskiy mir (russkaya i ukrainskaya retseptsiya): sbornik statey [N. V. Gogol and the Slavic world (Russian and Ukrainian reception): collection of articles]. Tomsk, 2010. Vol. 3. P. 384–480 (in Russian).
8. Rybalchenko T. L. Gogol’ i gogolevskiy khudozhestvennyy mir v tvorcheskom soznanii V. Otroshenko [Gogol and Gogol’s artistic world in the creative consciousness of V. Otroshenko]. Obrazy Italii v russkoy slovesnosti: Po itogam 2-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo tsentra “Russia – Italia” – “Rossiya – Italiya”, Tomsk – Novosibirsk, 1–7 iyunya [Images of Italy in Russian literature: Based on the results of the 2nd International. scientific conf. Intl. scientific research Center “Russia – Italia” – “Russia – Italy”. Tomsk – Novosibirsk, 1–7 June]. 2009. Tomsk, 2011. P. 269–293 (in Russian).
9. Simon G. A. Khudozhestvennaya reprezentatsiya antinomii “dobro/zlo” v tvorchestve N. Sadur. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Artistic representation of the antinomy “good/evil” in the works of N. Sadur. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Ulan-Ude, 2014. P. 45–66 (in Russian).
10. Maron A. Formy vyrazheniya avtorskogo soznaniya v dramaturgii Nikolaya Kolyady. Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Forms of expression of author’s consciousness in the dramaturgy of Nikolai Kolyada. Diss. doc. philol. sci.]. Zheshuv, 2016. P. 141–184 (in Russian).
11. Shleynikova E. E. “Bashmachkin’ O. Bogaeva kak dramaturgicheskiy rimeyk [Bashmachkin” by O. Bogaev as a dramatic remake]. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena – Izvestia: Hetzen University Journal of Humanities and Sciences, 2007, vol. 8, no. 27, pp. 97–102 (in Russian).
12. Tsipushtanova M. A. Gogolevskiy tekst v tvorcheskoy retseptsii Nikolaya Kolyady (p’yesa “Starosvetskaya lyubov’”) [Gogol’s text in the creative reception of Nikolai Kolyada (play “Old World Love”)]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta – Bulletin of Udmurt University, 2012, vol. 4, pp. 43–45 (in Russian).
13. Bal V. Yu. Gogolevskiy tekst v p’yesakh N. Kolyady (na materiale poemy “Mertvyye dushi” i komedii “Revizor”) [Gogol’s text in the plays of N. Kolyada (based on the poem “Dead Souls” and the comedy “The Inspector General”)]. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Philological Journal, 2020, no. 4, pp. 133‒147 (in Russian).
14. Meladshina Yu. V. Gogolevskiy tekst v romane V. A. Sharova “Vozvrashcheniye v Egipet: Vybrannyye mesta iz perepiski Nikolaya Vasil’yevicha Gogolya (vtorogo)». Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Gogol’s text in the novel by V. A. Sharov “Return to Egypt: Selected passages from the correspondence of Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol (second)”. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Perm, 2019. 228 p. (in Russian).
15. Bal V. Yu. Terpeniye i neterpeniye v russkom messianstve (roman V. Sharova “Vozvrashcheniye v Egipet”) [Patience and impatience in Russian messianism (V. Sharov’s novel “Return to Egypt”)]. Russkaya literatura v XX veke: imena, problemy, kul’turnyy dialog. Vypusk 11: Terpeniye: khudozhestvennaya interpretatsiya i tvorcheskaya praktika v russkoy literature XX veka [Russian literature in the twentieth century: names, problems, cultural dialogue. Vol. 11: Patience: artistic interpretation and creative practice in Russian literature of the twentieth century]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 2021. Pp. 90–110 (in Russian).
16. Bal V. Yu. Literaturnaya reputatsiya Gogolya: mezhdu dvukh kanonov (na materiale 200-letnego yubileya pisatelya v 2009 godu). Stat’ya 1 [Gogol’s literary reputation: between two canons (based on the writer’s 200th anniversary in 2009) Аrticle 1]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2020, no. 68, pp. 213‒242 (in Russian).
17. Bal V. Yu. Literaturnaya reputatsiya Gogolya: mezhdu dvukh kanonov (na materiale 200-letnego yubileya pisatelya v 2009 g.). Stat’ya 2 [Gogol’s literary reputation: between two canons (based on the writer’s 200th anniversary in 2009) Аrticle 2]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2021, no. 70, pp. 184‒198 (in Russian).
18. Teoriya literatury: uchebnoe posobiye dlya studentov filologicheskikh fakul’tetov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy: v 2 tomak. T. 1: Teoriya khudozhestvennogo diskursa. Teoreticheskaya poetika [Theory of literature: a textbook for students of philological faculties of higher educational institutions: in 2 volumes. Vol. 1: Theory of artistic discourse. Theoretical poetics]. Eds Tamarchenko N. D., Tyupa V. I., Broytman S. N. Moscow, 2004. 512 p. (in Russian).
19. Eykhenbaum B. M. Kak sdelana “Shinel’” Gogolya [How Gogol’s «Overcoat» was made]. O proze. Sbornik statey [About prose. Collection of articles]. Leningrad, KHudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1969. P. 306–326 (in Russian).
20. Skoropanova I. S. Russkaya postmodernistskaya literatura: uchebnoye posobiye [Russian postmodern literature: a textbook]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2001, 608 p. (in Russian).
21. Leyderman N., Lipovetskiy M. Sovremennaya russkaya literatura: 1950–1990-e gody: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy: v 2 tomakh. Tom 2: 1968–1990 [Modern Russian literature: 1950–1990s: a textbook for students of higher educational institutions: vol 2: 1968–1990]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2003. 688 p. (in Russian).
22. Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. Saint Petersburg, 2004. 704 p. (in Russian).
23. Bocharov S. G. O stile Gogolya [About Gogol’s style]. Tipologiya stilevogo razvitiya novogo vremeni: Klassicheskiy stil’. Sootnosheniye garmonii i disgarmonii v stile [Typology of stylistic development of modern times: Classical style. The relationship between harmony and disharmony in style]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976. Pp. 409–445 (in Russian).
24. Mann Yu. V. Karnaval i yego okrestnosti [Carnival and its surroundings]. Tvorchestvo Gogolya: smysl i forma [Gogol’s work: meaning and form]. Saint Petersburg, 2007. P. 656–682 (in Russian).
25. Rybal’chenko T. L. Situatsiya otkaza ot pisatel’stva v romanakh M. Bulgakova, B. Pasternaka, V. Makanina [The situation of refusal to write in the novels of M. Bulgakov, B. Pasternak, V. Makanin]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2003, no. 277, pp. 133–143 (in Russian).
26. Abasheva M. P. Literatura v poiskakh litsa (russkaya proza v kontse XX veka: stanovleniye avtorskoy identichnosti) [Literature in search of a face (Russian prose at the end of the 20th century: the formation of authorial identity)]. Perm, Perm University Publ., 2001. 320 p. (in Russian).
27. Makanin V. Andegraund, ili Geroy nashego vremeni [Underground, or Hero of Our Time]. Moscow, VAGRIUS Publ, 1999. 557 p. (in Russian).
28. Mal’kova A.V. Situatsiya govoreniya v romane V. Makanina “Andegraund, ili Geroy nashego vremeni” [The situation of speaking in V. Makanin’s novel “Underground, or Hero of Our Time”]. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Philology, 2017, no. 3, pp. 104–116 (in Russian).
29. P’yetsukh V. A. Nikolayu Vasil’yevichu. Demonstratsiya vozmozhnostey [To Nikolai Vasilievich. Demonstration of capabilities]. Plagiat. Povesti i rasskazy [Plagiarism. Novels and stories]. Moscow, Globulus, House NC Publ., 2006. P. 66–78 (in Russian).
30. Gogol’ i sovremennyy mir [Gogol and the modern world] (in Russian). URL: http://slovari21.ru/news/264 (accessed 16 March 2024).
31. Ol’ga Slavnikova: “Gen Tolstogo est’ u kazhdogo russkogo romanista” [Ol’ga Slavnikova: “Every Russian novelist has Tolstoy’s gene”] (in Russian). URL: https://lit-ra.info/intervyu/olga-slavnikova-gen-tolstogo-est-u-kazhdogo-russkogo-romanista/ (accessed 16 March 2024).
32. Karasev L. V. Veshchestvo literatury [The substance of literature]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2001. 400 p. (in Russian).
33. Slavnikova O. Chanel № 5 (in Russian). URL: https://puhanov.livejournal.com/89130.html (accessed 16 March 2024).
( 430.2 kB ) 
( 425.2 kB )
Issue: 4, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: RUSSIAN LITERATURE AND LITERATURE OF THE PEOPLES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Pages: 136 — 145
Downloads: 247