FEATURES AND “TRICKS” OF SCIENTIFIC LINGUISTIC HABITUS
The purpose of the article is to identify the features of scientific linguistic habitus. The author proceeds from the interpretation of science as a form of social practice and understanding of its subjective basis as a set of dispositions (scientific habitus). The linguistic habitus of science is defined as one of the sets of dispositions of the subject of scientific practice, acquired in a particular socio-historical context by taking into account the peculiarities of its carrier, and reflected the linguistic identity of a scientist to a particular tradition (educational, disciplinal, national, cultural). Responding to the question of how linguistic habitus is associated with an actual scientific practice, what specific nature it has and what the mechanisms of formation are, – the author, firstly, asserts the existence of a gap between the linguistic habitus of science and scientific practice itself. Secondly, the analysis of works of local researchers allows to refer intertextuality, expressivity and dialogueness identifying to the features of scientific linguistic habitus. Thirdly, the dynamics mechanism of scientific linguistic habitus is described on the basis of theories of P. Bourdieu and W. Labov.
Keywords: scientific practice, subject of scientific practice, linguistic habitus of science, intertextuality, expressivity, dialogueness
References:
1. Woolgar S. On the alleged distinction between discourse and praxis. Social Studies of Science, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 309-317.
2. Mikeshina L. A. Filosofiya poznaniya. Polemicheskie glavy [Philosophy of knowledge. Polemical Chapter]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2002. 624 p. (in Russian).
3. Medawar P. Is the Scientific Paper a Fraud? Experiment: A Series of Scientific case. London: British Broadcasting Corporation, 1964. Pp. 7–13 URL: http://www.albany.edu/~scifraud/data/sci_fraud_2927.html (accessed 7 October 2014).
4. Schickore J. Doing science, writing science. Philosophy of Science, 2008, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 323–343.
5. Shvyryov V. S. Yazyk nauki [The Language of Science]. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya v 4 t. [New Encyclopedia of Philosophy in 4 volumes]. Vol. 4. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 2001. 721 p. (in Russian).
6. Lyotard Zh. Sostoyanie postmoderna [The Condition of postmodern]. St. Petersburg, Aleteyya Publ., 1988. 160 p. (in Russian).
7. Harre R. Sotsialnaya epistemologiya: peredacha znaniya posredstvom rechi [Social Epistemology: transfer of knowledge through speech]. Voprosy filosofii – Questions of philosophy, 1992, no. 9, pp. 49-60 (in Russian).
8. Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory Life. The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, 1979. 294 p.
9. Pinch T. The culture of science and disciplinary rhetoric. European Journal of Education, 1990, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 295–304. URL: http://www.v-lab.unn.ru/texts/Pinch_Culture_of _Scientists.htm (accessed 5 August 2014).
10. Kristeva Yu. Izbrannye trudy: Razrushenie poetiki [Selected Works: The Destruction of Poetics] Per. s fr. Moscow, “Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya” (ROSSPEN), 2004. 656 p. (in Russian).
11. Korolyeva N. V. Sredstva i sposoby realizatsii intertekstualnosti v nauchnom diskurse (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka). Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Means and ways of realization of an intertekstualnost in a scientific discourse (on English material). Abstract of thesis cand. of leg. sci.] Pyatigorsk, 2004. 19 р. (in Russian).
12. Galison P. Zona obmena: koordinatsiya ubezhdeniy i deystviy [Trading Zone: Coordination of beliefs and actions]. Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki – Questions of History of Science and Technology, 2004, no. 1, pp. 64–91 (in Russian).
13. Skripak I. A. Ekspressivnyy sintaksis v tekstakh nauchnogo diskursa [Expressive syntax in the texts of scientific discourse]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philology. Theory and practice, 2013, no. 4 (22): in 2 ch., ch. II, pp. 170–173 (in Russian).
14. Ivanova V. A. Semiotika yazyka nauki v sistemnom analize nauchnogo znaniya. Avtoreferat dis. … d-ra filos. nauk [Semiotics of language science in the system analysis of scientific knowledge. Abstract of dis. dr. philos. sci.]. Novosibirsk, 2011. 30 p. (in Russian).
15. Glushkova M. S. Ustnyy polemicheskiy diskurs: osobennosti funktsionirovaniya v nauchnoy sfere. Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Oral polemical discourse: the peculiarities of functioning in the scientific field. Abstract. dis. cand. philol. sci.]. Moscow, 2013. 24 p. (in Russian).
16. Burd’e P. O proizvodstve i vosproizvodstve legitimnogo yazyka [On the production and reproduction of legitimate language]. Otechestvennye zapiski – Native notes, 2005, no. 2, pp. 23–35 (in Russian).
17. Caserius E. Sinkhroniya, diakhroniya i istoriya [Synchronic, diachronic and history]. Novoe v lingvistike. Vyp. 3. Sotsiolingvistika. Moscow, Inostrannaya literatura, Progress Publ., 1963. Pp. 143–343 (in Russian).
18. Labov U. Otrazhenie sotsialnykh protsessov v yazykovykh strukturakh [The reflection of social processes in language structures]. Novoe v lingvistike. Vyp. 7. Sotsiolingvistika. Moscow, Inostrannaya literatura, Progress. 1975. Pp. 320–335 (in Russian).
19. Labov U. O mekhanizme yazykovykh izmeneniy [On the mechanism of language change]. Novoe v lingvistike. Vyp.7. Sotsiolingvistika. Moscow, Inostrannaya literatura, Progress Publ., 1975. Pp. 199–228 (in Russian).
20. Bolotnov A. V. Intellektualnyy substil yazykovoy lichnosti i ego osobennosti: lingvisticheskaya interpretatsiya ponyatiya [Intellectual substyle of langauge personality and its peculiarities: linguistic interpretation of the notion]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, no. 9 (150), pp. 62–69 (in Russian).
( 394.58 kB ) 
( 386.91 kB )
Issue: 5, 2015
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: SCIENCE AND EDUCATION IN THE FIELD OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Pages: 96 — 102
Downloads: 859