Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 07.04.2026
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №5 THE SOCIAL FUNCTIONS OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE. TO THE DISCUSSION ON INTELLECTUALS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE SOCIAL FUNCTIONS OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE. TO THE DISCUSSION ON INTELLECTUALS

Shestakova M.A.

Information About Author:

The problem of intellectuals is genetically related to the question of the social functions of scientific knowledge. An intellectual in the European tradition is regarded as a link connecting science and society, making the transition from concrete scientific knowledge to the general socio-political issues. In this context, the notion of an intellectual is determined not by the reference to his line of work, but through the social functions that he performs outside the scientific community. The main social function of an intellectual is social design, formulation of common social objectives. Modern intellectuals are facing a choice between the neoliberal social project and the collective social project, the question of whether individual freedom can be regarded as a universal social purpose.

Keywords: intellectual, truth, ideology, social design, social functions of scientific knowledge

References:

1. Fadeeva L. F. Diskussii ob intellektualakh v kontekste politicheskoy istorii Zapada [Discussions on intellectuals in the context of the Western political history]. Dialog so vremenem – Dialogue with Time, 2012, no. 41, pp. 108–138 (in Russian).

2. Robert K. Merton. Social Theory and Social Structure, 1949 (Russ. ed. Merton R. Sotsial'naya teoriya i sotsial'naya struktura. Moscow, AST, AST Moskva, Khranitel Publ., 2006. 873 p.).

3. Pinto Louis. Le journalisme philosophique. In: Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. Vol. 101–102, mars 1994. L’emprise du journalisme. Pp. 25–38 (Russ. ed. Pinto L. Filosofskaya zhurnalistika. Sotsio-Logos postmodernizma. Al'manakh Rossiysko-frantsuzskogo tsentra sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniy Instituta sotsiologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. M.: Institut eksperimental'noy sotsiologii [Socio-Logos of Postmodernism. Almanac of the Russian-French Centre for sociological research of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences], Moscow, Institute of Experimental Sociology Publ., 1996, pp. 30–56. URL: http://sociologos.net/textes/pinto/pinto1.htm, (accessed 30 January 2015).

4. Jean-Paul Sartre. Situations Philosophiques [1990]. Collection Tel (No 171), Gallimard, pp. 219–238 (Russ. ed. Sartre Zh.-P. Zashchititel'naya rech' v pol'zu intellektualov. Lektsiya pervaya. Kto est' intellektual? Perevod s frantsuzskogo A. Zuykovoy. Skepsis. Nauchno-prosvetitel'skiy zhurnal. URL: http://scepsis.net/library/id_2752.html (accessed 30 January 2015).

5. Oeuvres de Saint-Simon publiés en 1832 par Olinde Rodrigues, Paris, Capelle 1841 (Russ. ed. S.-Simon H. Izbrannye sochineniya. Vol. 1. MCМXLVIII. Moscow-Leningrad, Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR Publ., 1948. 469 p.

6. Comte A. Discours sur l'esprit positif, P., 1844 (Russ. ed. Cont A. Dukh pozitivnoy filosofii (Slovo o polozhitel'nom myshlenii). Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2003. 256 p.

7. Foucault Michel. La fonction politique de l'intellectuel // Politique-Hebdo. 29 novem-bre-5 decembre 1976. P. 31–33 (Russ. ed.:

Fuko M. Politicheskaya funktsiya intellektuala. Izvlecheniye iz besedy Mishelya Fuko s ital'yanskimi zhurnalistami. Foucault M. Intellektualy i vlast: Isbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2002. Pp. 201–210).URL: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Culture/Fuko_intel_power/Fuko_10.php (accessed 30 January 2015).

8. Berdyaev N. Filosofskaya istina i intelligentskaya pravda [Philosophical truth, and the truth of intellectuals]. Vekhi. Intelligentsiya v Rossii. Sbornik statey 1909–1910 [Milestones. The intelligentsia in Russia. A Collection of Essays, 1909–1910]. Moscow, Molodaya Gvardiya Publ., 1991. 464 p. (in Russian).

9. Benda Julien. La trahison des clercs, 1927 (Russ. ed. Benda Zh. Predatel'stvo intellektualov.) Moscow, IRISEN, Mysl’, Sotsium Publ., 2009. 310 p.

10. Burd'ye P. Za angazhirovannoye znanie [For biased knowledge]. Neprikosnovenny zapas – Emergency store, 2002, no. 5 (25) (in Russian). URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2002/5/burd-pr.html (accessed 30 January 2015).

11. Touraine Alain. Le Retour de l'acteur: essai de sociologie, 1984 (Russ. ed Turen A. Vozvrashcheniye cheloveka deystvuyushchego. Ocherk sotsiologii. Moscow, Nauchny mir Publ., 1998. 204 p.)

shestakova_m._a._128_134_5_158_2015.pdf ( 361.79 kB ) shestakova_m._a._128_134_5_158_2015.zip ( 354.34 kB )

Issue: 5, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: SCIENCE AND EDUCATION IN THE FIELD OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

Pages: 128 — 134

Downloads: 1416

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU