Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 23.03.2026
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №3 CONNECTING DIFFERENT GENARATIONS IN FAMILY DISCOURSE: COMMUNICATION WITH GRANDCHILDREN
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

CONNECTING DIFFERENT GENARATIONS IN FAMILY DISCOURSE: COMMUNICATION WITH GRANDCHILDREN

Kolmogorova A.V.

Information About Author:

The article examines some peculiarities of grandmother-grandchild discursive interaction in family communication. Applying methodology of interactional and conversational analysis to the video data recordings of communicative interactions between different generations of two Russian families we argue that such interaction is governed by two contradictory intentions: to maintain the empathically warm communication and at the same time to protect the initial roles of dominant communicant (for grandmothers) or to fight for the status of independent communicant (for grandchildren). They both show some specific discursive devices: grandmothers’ use of joke aggression, memorative (telling about past events), assistance in the case of communicative failure; communicative sabotage for grandchildren.

Keywords: family discourse, discourse interaction, communication between generations, discursive devices, «communicative sabotage», non-verbal communication

References:

1. Mamardashvili M. Besedy o myshlenii [Refl exing about mind]. Estetika myshleniya [Aesthetics of thinking]. Moscow, Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy Publ., 2000. Pp. 5–205 (in Russian).

2. Zvyagintseva V. V. K voprosu ob opredelenii granits semeynogo diskursa v svete lingvopragmaticheskoy teorii [About limits of family discourse in the light of lingvo-pragmatic theory]. Teoriya yazyka i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. trudov [The theory of language and intercultural communication: Intercollege collection of research papers]. Ed. T. Yu. Sazonova. No. 1 (7). Kursk, KGU Publ., 2009. Pp. 51–54 (in Russian).

3. Makarov M. L. Interpretativnyy analiz diskursa v maloy gruppe [Interpretative discourse analysis in small groups]. Tver’, Tverskoy gos. un-t Publ., 1998. 200p. (in Russian).

4. Kolmogorova A. V. “Mamin yazyk”: praktiki materinskogo obshcheniya v kontekste raspredelonnoy modeli yazyka i kognitsii [Practices of motherchild communication in the context of distributed cognition theory]. Moscow, Flinta-Nauka Publ., 2013. 168. p (in Russian).

5. Kolmogorova A. V. Evristicheskiy potentsial videokorpusa «Rodnaya rech’: praktiki materinskogo obshcheniya» dlya issledovaniya kontseptualizatsii sotsial’nykh emotsiy v russkom yazykovom soznanii [Heuristic potential of videcorpus “Native Speech: practices of mother-child communication” for investigating process of social emotions conceptualization in Russian linguistic conscience]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki – Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2014, no. 2, pp. 25–33 (in Russian).

6. Baykulova A. N. Semeynaya kommunikatsiya: rol’ ottsa i eyo rechevoye voploshcheniye [Family communication: role of father and its verbalization]. Izvestiya VGPU – VGPU Bulletin, 2014, no. 5, pp. 29–31 (in Russian).

7. Leontovich O. A., Yakusheva E. V. Ponimaniye – nachalo soglasiya: mezhkul’turnaya semeynaya kommunikatsiya [Understanding as a beginning of concordance: cross-cultural family communication]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2014. 224 p. (in Russian).

8. Schegloff E. Sequencing in Conversational Opening. American Antropologist, 1968, LXX, no. 6, pp. 1075–1095.

kolmogorova_a._v._33_36_3_168_2016.pdf ( 400.73 kB ) kolmogorova_a._v._33_36_3_168_2016.zip ( 394.99 kB )

Issue: 3, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS

Pages: 33 — 36

Downloads: 1315

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU