Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 30.03.2026
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №6 VERBS OF INDEPENDENT MOVEMENT ON A FIRM SURFACE IN THE SELKUP LANGUAGE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

VERBS OF INDEPENDENT MOVEMENT ON A FIRM SURFACE IN THE SELKUP LANGUAGE

Polyakova N.V.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-6-96-99

Information About Author:

Polyakova N. V., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: nvp@tspu.edu.ru, nataliapoliakova@yahoo.com

The verbs denoting independent movement on a firm surface in the Taz, central and southern dialects of the Selkup language are considered. In the dialects of the Selkup language the lexico-semantic group of verbs of motion is represented by a significant amount of the verbs describing various ways of the movement, its nature, general orientation against the speaker, conditions in which this movement occurs, etc. There is a relatively little number of polysemantic verbs among the verbs of movement in the dialects of the Selkup language and the number of meanings of verbs is insignificant as well. Most Selkup verbs of motion (60 %) are monosemantic, about 60 % of meanings do not repeat, i.e. they are peculiar to one verb of motion. In the Selkup lexico-semantic group of verbs of motion the synonymic relations are poorly developed in comparison with Russian in spite of the fact that among the verbs of motion in the Selkup language the synonymy is more developed than in other lexico-semantic groups of the studied language. The verb qənqo is the central element of the lexico-semantic group of verbs of motion in the Taz dialect of the Selkup language. The semantics of this verb does not include the description of conditions in which the movement occurs, its direction, way and mode. The verbs čāǯįgu and kwangu are the central elements of the lexico-semantic group of verbs of motion in the southern and central dialects of the Selkup language. Description of the general direction of the movement (making nearer or farther) and orientation in space is the most essential thing for the Selkup verbs of motion. There are several specifics of the lexico-semantic group of verbs of motion in the dialects of the Selkup language: existence of the space-oriented verbs; the verbs denoting movements in space made by means of certain devices / vehicles; almost full incompatibility of the verbs of motion with the abstract nouns and nouns denoting objects, incapable of the independent movement. The movement and the ability to the movement is a marker of animateness, on the basis of this marker representatives of the Selkup ethnos differentiate animated and inanimate, i.e. alive and dead. Everything that moves is animated.

Keywords: verbs of motion, verbs of movement, movement direction, the Selkup language

References:

1. Kuznetsova A. I., Khelimskiy E. A., Grushkina E. V. Ocherki po sel’kupskomu yazyku. Tazovskiy dialekt [Essays about the Selkup language. Tazovsky dialect]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1980, vol. 1. 408 р. (in Russian).

2. Persidskaya A., Polyakova N. Linguocultural Analysis of Nomination of Fimgers in the Selkup Language. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Rome: MCSER Publishing, 2015, vol. 6. № 3, S. 2, pp. 448–452. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s2p448.

3. Normanskaya Yu. V., Krasikova N. L. Nekotorye prichiny semanticheskikh izmeneniy (na materiale genezisa i razvitiya sistemy glagolov plavaniya v sel’kupskom yazyke) [Some reasons of the semantic changes (on the material of genesis and devolopment of the verbs of swimming in the Selkup lamguage]. Uralo-altayskiye issledovaniya – Ural-Altaic Studies, vol. 1, pp. 49-60 (in Russian).

4. Bykonya V. V., Karmanova Yu. A. Lingvokul’turologicheskiy ananliz naimenovaniy nasekomykh v sel’kupskom yazyke [Cultural and linguistic analysis of insects names in the Selkup language]. Sibirskiy fi lologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian philological journal, 2012, vol. 2, pp. 163–174 (in Russian).

5. Sel’kupsko-russkiy dialektnyy slovar’ [Selkup and Russian dialect dictionary]. Under the editorship of professor V. V. Bykonya. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2005. 348 p. (in Russian).

6. Filchenko A., Potanina O., Kryukova E., Baydak A. et al. Sbornik annotirovannykh fol’klornykh i bytovykh tekstov obsko-eniseyskogo yazykovogo areala [Annotated Folklore and Daily Prose Texts of Ob-Yenissei Linguistic Area]. Tomsk, Agraf-Press Publ., 2013, vol. 2. 247 p. (in Russian).

7. Filchenko A., Potanina O., Tanoyan M., Kurganskaya Yu., Kryukova E., Maksimova N., Fedotova N. et al. Sbornik annotirovannykh fol’klornykh i bytovykh tekstov obsko-eniseyskogo yazykovogo areala [Annotated Folklore and Daily Prose Texts of Ob-Yenissei Linguistic Area]. Tomsk, Vayar Publ., 2013, vol. 3. 386 p. (in Russian).

8. Filchenko A., Potanina O., Kryukova E., Baydak A., Fedotova N., Maksimova N., Gusev V. et al. Annotirovannye fol’klornye teksty obskoeniseyskogo yazykovogo areala [Annotated Folklore Prose Texts of Ob-Yenissey Language Area]. Tomsk, Veter Publ., 2010. 336 p. (in Russian).

9. Polyakova N. V. Kontseptualizatsiya atmosfernykh osadkov v sel’kupskom yazyke v sopostavlenii s russkim [The conceptualization of the atmospheric precipitation on the Selkup language in comparison with the Russian language]. Tomskiy zhurnal lingvisticheskih i antropologicheskih issledovaniy – Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, 2013, vol. 2 (2), pp. 69–74 (in Russian).

10. Polyakova N. V. Obyektivatsiya reki v yazykovoy kartine mira sel’kupskogo etnosa [Objectivization of river in the linguistic world-view of the Selkup ethnos]. Tomskiy zhurnal lingvisticheskih i antropologicheskikh issledovaniy – Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, 2014, vol. 2 (4), pp. 29–33 (in Russian).

polyakova_n._v._96_99_6_183_2017.pdf ( 415.92 kB ) polyakova_n._v._96_99_6_183_2017.zip ( 410.23 kB )

Issue: 6, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: LANGUAGES OF THE PEOPLES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Pages: 96 — 99

Downloads: 1692

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU