Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 09.12.2025
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №7 ON THE QUESTION OF THE SPEECH GENRE PALETTE OF THE MEDICAL DISCOURSE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

ON THE QUESTION OF THE SPEECH GENRE PALETTE OF THE MEDICAL DISCOURSE

Kositskaya Faina Leonidovna, Matyukhina Mariya Viktorovna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-7-43-47

Information About Author:

Kositskaya F. L., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: fainak@list.ru Matyukhina M. V., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: matyukhina.mariya@mail.ru

The article deals with the results of a study devoted to medical discourse and its speech genre differentiation in the communicative space of Great Britain, France, Russia (three countries). The medical discourse is one of the oldest discourses, since it is about the main, basic values of a person ‒ his health and life. The humanity strives to increase the duration and improve the quality of life. The Medical discourse refers to the institutional discourse, as it serves a special institution, the social stratum – the medical community. The polydiscursivity is a characteristic of the medical discourse,that is born at the intersection of scientific, academic, legal, advertising, commercial, pharmaceutical, cosmetic and medical discourse proper, which is the leading discourse in this symphony of discourses. The speech genre palette of the medical discourse is extensive and diverse. The study deals only with the written speech genres of the medical discourse, which have their own characteristics. The written speech genres of the medical discourse are characterized bythe logical alignment, reasonableness, coherence, preparedness, a consistent development of the theme, the selection of linguistic means, the graphical representation on paper and the distance in time. They are visually perceptible and can be reproduced many times. The Russian medical discourse proper, in contrast to the English (British) and French medical discourses, is characterized by the largest number of the written speech genres, which is due to the extralinguistic factors: national, political, socio-cultural, legal, historical.

Keywords: medical discourse, genre, speech genre, speech genre palette, Russian medical discourse, medical discourse proper

References:

1. Arutyunova N. D. Diskurs [Discourse]. Bol’shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’. Yazykoznaniye [Large encyclopedia. Linguistics]. Moscow, 1998. Pp. 136–137 (in Russian).

2. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [The language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2002. 477 p. (in Russian).

3. Makarov M. L. Osnovy teorii diskursa [Discourse theory foundations]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2003. 280 p. (in Russian).

4. Nikolayeva T. M. Lingvistika teksta. Sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy [Linguistics of the text. Current state and prospects]. Novoye v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. 8. Lingvistika teksta [New in foreign linguistics. Issue 8. Text linguistics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1978. Pp. 5–39 (in Russian).

5. Dem’yankov V. Z. Interpretatsiya politicheskogo diskursa v SMI [Interpretation of political discourse in the media]. Yazyk SMI kak ob”yekt mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniya: uchebnoye posobiye [The language of the media as an object of interdisciplinary research: textbook]. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University Publ., 2003. Pp. 116–133 (in Russian).

6. Kibrik A. A. Analiz diskursa v kognitivnoy perspektive. Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Analysis of a discourse in the cognitive perspective. Diss. doc. of philol. sci.]. Moscow, 2003. 90 p. (in Russian).

7. Deyk T. A. van. Yazyk. Poznaniye. Kommunikatsiya: per. s angl. [Language. Cognition. Communication: translation from English]. Blagoveshchensk, Blagoveshchenskiy gumanitarnyy kolledzh Publ., 2000. 308 p. (in Russian).

8. Serio P. Kak chitayut teksty vo Frantsii [How texts are read in France]. Kvadratura smysla: frantsuzskaya shkola analiza diskursa: per. s fr. i portug. [The quadrature of the meaning: the French school of discourse analysis: transl. from French and Portuguese]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1999. Pp. 14–53 (in Russian).

9. Kositskaya F. L., Matyukhina M.V. Angliyskiy meditsinskiy diskurs v sfere professional’noy kommunikatsii [The English medical discourse in the sphere of professional communication]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2017, vol. 6. (183), pp. 44–48. DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-6-44-48 (in Russian).

10. Kositskaya F. L., Matyukhina M.V. Frantsuzskiy meditsinskiy diskurs v sfere professional’noy kommunikatsii [The French medical discourse in the sphere of professional communication]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2017, vol. 3 (180), pp. 14–17. DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-3-14-17 (in Russian).

11. Shuravina L. S. Meditsinskiy diskurs kak tip institutsional’nogo diskursa [The medical discourse as a type of institutional discourse]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Сhelyabinsk State University, 2013, no. 37 (328), pp. 65–67 (in Russian).

12. Galyashina Ye. I. Problemy differentsiatsii spontannoy i podgotovlennoy rechi [Problems of differentiation of spontaneous and prepared speech]. Moscow, 2002. 123 p. (in Russian).

13. Meditsinskaya ambulatornaya karta bol’nogo [Patient’s medical record]. Portal informatsionnoy poddrezhki spetsialistov LPU [Portal of information support of specialists of treatment and prophylactic institutions) (in Russian). URL: http:// www.zdrav.ru/articles/4293658134-17-m12-15-ambulatornaya-karta (accessed 25 June 2018).

kositskaya_f._l._43_47_7_196_2018.pdf ( 447.05 kB ) kositskaya_f._l._43_47_7_196_2018.zip ( 441.08 kB )

Issue: 7, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND TEXT LINGUISTICS

Pages: 43 — 47

Downloads: 1376

For citation:


2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU