Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 07.04.2026
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №7 ON THE ISSUE OF THE NOTION “COMPETENCE-ORIENTED TASK”
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

ON THE ISSUE OF THE NOTION “COMPETENCE-ORIENTED TASK”

Shmigirilova I.B.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-7-121-129

Information About Author:

Shmigirilova I. B., North Kazakhstan State University (ul. Pushkina, 86, Petropavlovsk, Kazakhstan, 150000). E-mail: irinankzu@mail.ru

The urgency of establishing the essence of the term “competence-oriented task” is determined by the orientation toward achieving substantive, meta-subject and personal results of education in the secondary school educational practice. This category, widely used in pedagogical science and educational practice, does not quite justifiably relate to the concept of a task of a practical nature. The establishment of the specificity of competence-oriented tasks is carried out on the basis of an analysis of the positions of different authors, not only in understanding this category, but also in the semantically close to it concepts of “contextual task” and “situational task”, and also in connection with the modern interpretation of the learning task as a means of forming integrated educational result. The conclusion is drawn on the understanding of competence-oriented tasks as the tasks that, along with the formation of the subject competences of the student, determine the development of such qualities that determine the ability and readiness for independent cognitive activity, that is, the qualities whose totality determines the concept of cognitive competence. Examples of competence-oriented tasks are considered. Requirements to competency-oriented tasks in teaching mathematics are formulated. Proceeding from the structural and content features of cognitive competence as a significant component of an integral system of personality characteristics of a school graduate, the requirements that must be met in competence-oriented problems of school mathematics are established.

Keywords: competence-oriented task, contextual task, situational task, learning task, cognitive competence of the learner

References:

1. Shmigirilova I. B. Shkol’noye obrazovaniye v kontekste kompetentnostnogo podkhoda [School education in the context of the competency approach]. Pedagogika, 2013, no. 1, pp. 49–53 (in Russian).

2. Shmigirilova I. B. Problemy realizatsii kompetentnostnogo podkhoda v shkol’nom obrazovanii [Problems of the Competence Approach Implementation in the School Education]. Obrazovaniye i nauka – The Education and Science Journal, 2013, no. 7 (106), pp. 38–48 (in Russian).

3. Shekhonin A. A., Tarlykov V. A., Kleshcheva I. V., Bagautdinova A. Sh., Bud’ko M. B., Bud’ko M. Yu., Voznesenskaya A. O., Zabodalova L. A., Nadtochiy L. A., Orlova O. Yu. Kompetentnostno oriyentirovannyye zadaniya v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya [Competent-oriented tasks in the higher education system]. Saint Petersburg, ITMO University Publ., 2014. 98 p. (in Russian).

4. Verbitskiy A. A. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod v teorii kontekstnogo obucheniya [Competence approach in the theory of contextual learning]. Moscow, Research Center for Quality Problems in Training Specialists Publ., 2004. 84 p. (in Russian).

5. Serikov V. V. Obrazovaniye i lichnost’. Teoriya i praktika proyektirovaniya pedagogicheskikh system [Education and personality. Theory and practice of designing pedagogical systems]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 1999. 272 p. (in Russian).

6. Dalinger V. A., Yanushch ik O. V. Kontekstnyye zadachi po matematike kak sredstvo diagnostiki urovnya sformirovannosti predmetnoy kompetentsii u studentov inzhenernykh spetsial’nostey [Contextual problems in mathematics as a means of diagnosing the level of formation of subject competence in engineering students]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye segodnya – Higher Education Today, 2011, no. 10, pp. 65–67 (in Russian).

7. Boaler J. The role of contexts in the mathematics classroom: Do they make mathematics more “real”? For the Learning of Mathematics, 1993, iss. 13 (2), pp. 12–17.

8. Chapman O. Classroom practices for context of mathematics word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2006, iss. 62 (2), pp. 211–230.

9. Widjaja W. The Use of Contextual Problems to Support Mathematical Learning. IndoMS-JME, 2013, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 151–159.

10. Freudenthal H. Revisiting mathematics education, China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991. 214 p.

11. Belova Ye. V., Luk’yanenok M. A. “Zadachi na smysl”: dialogovyye formy i usloviya ispol’zovaniya v uchebnom protsesse [“Sense Tasks” dialogue forms and conditions of use in the educational process]. Rossiyskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Russian Psychological Journal, 2014, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 33–40 (in Russian).

12. Zil’berbrand N. Yu., Rudakova I. A. Tipologiya smyslovykh zadach v sovremennoy didaktike [Typology of semantic problems in modern didactics]. Fundamental’nyye issledovaniya. Pedagogicheskiye nauki – Fundamental Research. Pedagogical Sciences, 2014, no. 5, pp. 177–181 (in Russian).

13. Vakhtina Ye. A., Artyukhina A. I., Chumakov V. I. Samostoyatel’naya rabota studentov po pedagogike: formirovaniye uchebno-issledovatel’skoy kompetentnosti: uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye [Independent work of students in pedagogy: the formation of educational and research competence]. Volgograd, Izd-vo VolgSMU Publ., 2013, 101 p. (in Russian).

14. Shabanova I. A., Kovalev S. V., Poleshchuk O. Kh., Minich A.S., Yakutina D. V. Situatsionnyye zadachi v podgotovke budushchikh uchiteley khimii [Situational tasks in training of future chemistry teachers]. Vestnik Tomskogo pedagogicheskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2017, vol. 12 (189), pp. 92–99 (in Russian). DOI 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-12-92-99.

15. Pavlenko Ye. K. Situatsionnyye zadachi kak forma interaktivnogo izucheniya shkol’nogo kursa geografi i [Situational tasks as a form of interactive study of school geography course]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern problems of science and education, 2012, no. 2 (in Russian). URL: https://www.science-education.ru/pdf/2012/2/457.pdf (accessed 27 May 2018).

16. Novyye pedagogicheskiye praktiki: konstruirovaniye i primeneniye situatsionnykh zadach: uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye [New pedagogical practices: the construction and application of situational tasks: educational-methodical guide]. Comp. Slobozhaninov Yu. V. Kirov, 2012. 72 p. (in Russian).

17. Orlova S.L., Taslitskaya Ye. M., Karamshuk I. N. Razrabotka uchebno-poznavatel’nykh i uchebno-prakticheskikh zadach, napravlennykh na formirovaniye universal’nykh uchebnykh deystviy v protsesse obucheniya matematike, fi zike, informatike [Design of educational-informative and educational and practical tasks aimed at the formation of universal educational activities in the teaching of mathematics, physics, computer science]. Omsk, Institute of Education Development of the Omsk Region Publ., 2016. 56 р. (in Russian).

18. Avanesov V. S. Osnovy nauchnoy organizatsii pedagogicheskogo kontrolya v vysshey shkole: posobiye dlya slushateley Uchebnogo tsentra Gosobrazovaniya SSSR [Fundamentals of the scientifi c organization of pedagogical control in higher education: a manual for students of the Educational Center of the State Education of the USSR]. Moscow, Issledovatel’skiy tsentr Publ., 1988. 107 p. (in Russian).

19. Kharitonova O. V. Razvitiye uchebno-poznavatel’noy kompetentnosti starsheklassnikov na urokakh geometrii. Dis. cand. ped. nauk [Development of educational and cognitive competence of senior pupils in geometry classes. Dis. cand. ped. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, 2006. 167 p. (in Russian).

20. Nisbet, S., Langrall, C., & Mooney, E. The role of context in students’ analysis of data. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 2007, iss. 12 (1), pp. 16–22.

21. Walkington C. Using learning technologies to personalize instruction to student interest: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2013, iss. 105 (4), pp. 932–945.

22. Pavlova L. V. Sistema poznavatel’nykh kompetentnostnykh zadach kak sredstvo sovershenstvovaniya predmetno-metodicheskoy kompetentnosti budushchego uchitelya matematiki [System of cognitive competence problems as a means of improving the subject-method competence of the future teacher of mathematics]. Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yestestvennyye i fi ziko-matematicheskiye nauki – Vestnik PskovSU. Series: Natural and physical and mathematical sciences, 2009, no. 8, pp. 58–66 (in Russian).

23. Pavlova L. V. Kompetentnostnyye zadachi po geometrii: uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye [Competence problems in geometry: educationalmethodical guide]. Pskov, Pskovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., 2014. 84 p. (in Russian).

24. Makarychev Yu. N. , Mindyuk N. G., Neshkov K. I., Suvorova S. B. Algebra. 9 klass: ucheb. dlya obshcheobrazov. organizatsiy [Algebra. Grade 9: Textbook. for general images. organizations]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 2014. 271 p. (in Russian).

25. Shmigirilova I. B. Poznavatel'naya kompetentnost' kak sistema trebovaniy k lichnosti vypusknika sredney shkoly [Perceptional competence as a system of requirements to secondary school leavers’ personalities]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Herald of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, 2012, no. 5, pp. 209–221 (in Russian).

26. Shmigirilova I. B. Poznavatel’naya kompetentnost’ v aspekte poznavatel’noy samostoyatel’nosti i poznavatel’noy aktivnosti [The Cognitive Competence Compared to Cognitive Independence and Activity]. Obrazovaniye i nauka – The Education and Science Journal, 2014, no. 7, pp. 134–146 (in Russian).

shmigirilova_i._b._121_129_7_196_2018.pdf ( 477.37 kB ) shmigirilova_i._b._121_129_7_196_2018.zip ( 470.09 kB )

Issue: 7, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: GENERAL AND ADDITIONAL EDUCATION

Pages: 121 — 129

Downloads: 1784

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU