Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 13.04.2026
Home Issues 2020 Year Issue №2 CONTEXT MACRO-STRUCTURES AS THE MECHANISM OF FORMING DIALOGICAL MODELS OF COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL WEB-RADIO DISCOURSE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

CONTEXT MACRO-STRUCTURES AS THE MECHANISM OF FORMING DIALOGICAL MODELS OF COMMUNICATION IN SOCIAL WEB-RADIO DISCOURSE

Yermolenkina L.I.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-2-55-60

Information About Author:

Yermolenkina L. I., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kiyevskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634000). E-mail: arblar2004@rambler.ru

Introduction. The article discusses the principles of organizing a dialogue between users of social networks of entertainment radio. Modern convergent forms of media communication are realized at the intersection of discursive macrostructures. In particular, radio functions in social networks of the Internet as a multifactorial phenomenon, depending on the technological and ideological features of media sources, such as radio and the Internet. The innovative nature of the traditional source of information is manifested in the position of the addressee, which is due to the capabilities of the Internet user. The one-way communication method of analog radio acquires the qualities and capabilities of an interactive interaction model, the listener becomes a user, an active subject of discourse, his agent and content generator. Results and discussion. The analyzed material allows us to draw the following conclusions. The method of dialogue depends on the dominant macrostructures, which are either analog radio or social networkcommunication. The indicated macrostructures realize themselves at the level of values and the ideology of network communication. The macrostructure of the radio is explicated in the speech of the communicants in settings on the personal plan of interaction. The macrostructure implements an intersubject model of interaction. The macrostructure of social network communication manifests itself in the psycho-speech mechanisms of affiliation, namely, in the connection of speakers to the speech in order to actualize in public space, realizing a quasi-subject communication model. The second model does not show explicit markers of dialogue, but can be considered from the point of view of successful communication, given the general discursive perspective and the social-network form of organization of communication.

Keywords: entertainment radio, discourse of radio in social networks, dialogical models of communication, context macro-structures

References:

1. Yermolenkina L. I. Diskursivnaya lichnost’ v kommunikativnom prostranstve sovremennogo radio [Discursive person in communicative space of modern radio]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2017, no. 2, pp. 37–40 (in Russian).

2. Kostyashina Ye. A. Mekhanizmy diskursivnykh transformatsiy kommunikativnoy modeli “avtor – adresat” v tekstovom prostranstve nauchnopopulyarnogo meditsinskogo zhurnala [The mechanisms of discourse transformations in the communicative model “author – addressee” in text space of health magazines]. Yazyk i kul’tura – Language and Culture, 2010, no. 2 (10), pp. 22–28 (in Russian).

3. Rezanova Z. I., Skripko Yu. K. Lichnost’ v srede diskursa: yazykovaya reprezentatsiya sotsial’no-psikhologicheskikh tipov (na materiale diskursa virtual’nykh fan-soobshchestv muzykal’noy napravlennosti [Personality in the medium of discourse: linguistic representation of psychological types (based on the discourse of virtual music fan communities)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2016, no. 3 (41), pp. 37–56 (in Russian).

4. Matison D. Mediadiskurs. Analiz mediatekstov. Issledovaniya media i kul’tury [Discourse of media. Analysis of media texts. Media and Culture Studies]. Kharkov, Gumanitarnyy tsentr Publ, 2017 (in Russian).

5. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Esthetics of verbal art]. Moscow, Art Publ, 1986 (in Russian).

6. Eco U. Otsutsvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedeniye v semiologiyu [Missing structure. Introduction in semiology]. Moscow, Simposium Publ, 2004 (in Russian).

7. Kuznetsov V. G. Vliyaniye SMI na traditsionnoye ponimaniye sotsializatsii [The infl uence of the media on the traditional understanding of socialization]. Yazyk i diskurs sredstv massovoy informatsii v ХХI veke [Language and discourse of mass media in ХХI century]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2011. Pp. 19–30 (in Russian).

8. Van Dijk T. Analiz novostey kak diskursa [Analysis of news as a discourse]. Yazyk. Poznaniye. Kommunikatsiya [Language. Cognition. Communication]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989. Pp. 111–160 (in Russian).

9. Negryshev A. A. Novosti v presse: k modelirovaniyu makrotekstovoy structury [News in press]. Yazyk i diskurs sredstv massovoy informatsii v ХХI veke [Language and discourse of mass media in ХХI century]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2011. Pp. 85–97 (in Russian).

10. Serio P. Analiz diskursa vo frantsuzskoy shkole (Diskurs i interdiskurs) [Discourse analysis in a French school (Discourse and interdiscourse)]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy Proyekt Publ., Yekaterinburg, Delovaya kniga Publ., 2001 (in Russian).

11. Fuko M. Arkheologiya znaniya [The archeology of knowledge]. Saint Petersburg, Gumanitarnaya akademiya Publ., Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2004 (in Russian).

12. Noveyshiy filosofskiy slovar’ [New philosophical dictionary]. Moscow, Knizhniy dom Publ., 2003 (in Russian).

13. Bodriyyar Zh. Sistema veshchey [The system of items]. Moscow, Tsentr gumanitarnykh tekhnologiy Publ., 1995, 2001 (in Russian). URL: https://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/3496 (accessed 10 March 2008).

14. Pickering M. J., Garrod S. Automaticity in language production in monologue and dialogue. In: Meyer A. S. Wheeldon L. R. Krott A. (eds) Automaticity and control in language processing. Hove, Psychology Press, 2007.

15. Fyodorova O. V. Eksperimental’nyy analiz discursa [Experimental discourse analysis]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2014. 512 p. (in Russian).

16. Clark H. On Stochastic grammar. Language, 2005, 81 (1).

yermolenkina_l._i._55_60_2_208_2020.pdf ( 457.61 kB ) yermolenkina_l._i._55_60_2_208_2020.zip ( 451.21 kB )

Issue: 2, 2020

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: LINGUOCULTUROLOGY AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION

Pages: 55 — 60

Downloads: 1390

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU