MOTIVATIONAL AND GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LEXICAL-SEMANTIC FIELD “HARM” IN THE DIALECTS OF THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-5-36-41
Introduction. This article is devoted to the study of motivational relationships and nomination models in the lexical-semantic field “Harm” based on the material of the dialects of the Russian language. The vocabulary of this field is associated with the expression of the negative utilitarian evaluation. The analysis of motivational relations and nomination models in the vocabulary of utilitarian evaluation shows the features of understanding the concept of “harm” in the minds of carriers of traditional culture. Aim and objectives. The aim is to identify structural-semantic and motivational relationships in the lexicalsemantic field “Harm”. Material and methods. Dialect material was collected from 49 issues of the Dictionary of Russian dialects. The detection of motivational features, as well as nomination models based on them, suggests a component analysis of the semantics of the derivative word in comparison with the semantics of the generating word, grouping of the signs of nomination in the model of nomination. The areal method and, in the case of an unclear internal form, the comparative historical method, serves to clarify the functional and semantic features. Results and discussion. Consideration of the motivational-genetic relationships of the units of the lexical-semantic field “Harm” in the dialects of the Russian language made it possible to identify and track the formation of the conceptual structure of negative utilitarian evaluation in traditional culture. As a result, it turned out that most field tokens have unambiguously established motivational relations, except for units of the core and the perinuclear part of the field, which have lost the transparency of motivational relations due to the historical depth of their occurrence. To reconstruct the motivational relations of these lexemes, data of etymological dictionaries are used. The analysis of semantic connections and motivational relations of field vocabulary made it possible to identify field boundaries and identify eight nomination models. Conclusion. The found motivational relations and the motivational models presented by them revealed, on the one hand, a fundamental similarity with the previously considered motivational characteristics on the material of the literary language, and on the other hand, they revealed differences associated with historical changes in motivational relations caused by the evolution of the concept of “harm”.
Keywords: Russian language, dialectal lexicon, the concept of “harm”, motivational relationship, motivational model
References:
1. Dronova L. P., Liu Yanchun. Motivatsionno-geneticheskaya kharakteristika leksiko-semanticheskogo polya “Vred” v russkom literaturnom yazyke [Motivational and genetic characteristics of the lexical-semantic field “Harm” in the Russian literary language]. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Philology, 2017, no. 4, pp. 202–213 (in Russian).
2. Liu Yanchun. Motivatsionnaya struktura subpolya “Sglaz, porcha” leksiko-semanticheskogo polya “Vred” v dialektakh russkogo yazyka [Motivational structure of the subfield “Evil eye, damage” of the lexical-semantic field “Harm” in dialects of the Russian language]. Vestnik Tomskogo Universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2018, no. 427, pp. 47–54 (in Russian).
3. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 2 [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects. Vol. 2]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1966. 317 p. (in Russian).
4. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 22 [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects. Vol. 22]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1987, 368 p. (in Russian).
5. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 46 [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects. Vol. 46]. St. Peterburg Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2013. 350 p. (in Russian).
6. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 10 [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects. Vol. 10]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1974. 388 p. (in Russian).
7. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 12 [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects. Vol. 12]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1977. 369 p. (in Russian).
8. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 32 [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects. Vol. 32]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1998. 272 p. (in Russian).
9. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 40 [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects. Vol. 40]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2006. 346 p. (in Russian).
10. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka XI–XVII vekov. Vyp. 20 [Dictionary of the Russian language of the XI–XVII centuries. Vol. 20]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1995. 288 p. (in Russian).
11. Fasmer M. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka: V 4 t. [Etymological dictionary of the Russian language: in 4 volumes. Translation from German and additions by O. N. Trubachev]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987. 832 p. (in Russian).
12. Dal’ V. I. Tolkovyy slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: v 4 t. [Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language: in 4 volumes. Ed. I. A. Baudouin de Courtenaye]. Moscow, Progress Univers Publ., 1994 (in Russian).
13. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 15 [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects. Vol. 15]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1979. 400 p. (in Russian).
14. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 16 [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects. Vol. 16]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1980. 376 p. (in Russian).
15. Trubachev O. N. (ed.) Etimologicheskiy slovar’ slavyanskikh yazykov: praslavyanskiy leksicheskiy fond. Vyp. 13 [Dictionary of the Russian language of the XI–XVII centuries. Vol. 13.]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987. 144 p. (in Russian).
16. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 11 [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects. Vol. 11]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1976. 364 p. (in Russian).
17. Slovar’ russkikh narodnykh govorov. Vyp. 34 [Dictionary of Russian folk dialects. Vol. 34]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2000. 369 p. (in Russian).
18. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka XI–XVII vekov. Vyp. 13 [Dictionary of the Russian language of the XI–XVII centuries. Vol. 13]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. 1987. 322 p. (in Russian).
19. Fasmer M. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka: v 4 t. [Etymological dictionary of the Russian language: in 4 volumes. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986. T. 2. 672 p. (in Russian).
20. Varbot Zh. Zh. K rekonstruktsii i etimologii nekotorykh praslavyanskikh glagol’nykh osnov i otglagol’nykh imen. IX (*zoriti/*zariti II; *obsog’’ i *obsožití; *syknǫti; *r’v’n’ i *ruja; *guzlo) [On the reconstruction and etymology of some Proto-Slavic verb stems and verb names. IX ((*zoriti/*zariti II; *obsogъ and *obsožití; *syknǫti; *rьvьnь and *ruja; *guzlo)]. Etimologiya, 1980 [Etymology. 1980]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. pp. 30–36 (in Russian).
( 451.08 kB ) 
( 445.2 kB )
Issue: 5, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 5
Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF RUSSIAN STUDIES
Pages: 36 — 41
Downloads: 1067