Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 17.02.2026
Home Issues 2020 Year Issue №5 COGNITIVE ASPECT OF ANALYSIS OF MODERN ENGLISH PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

COGNITIVE ASPECT OF ANALYSIS OF MODERN ENGLISH PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS

Belozyorova E.Y.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-5-80-87

Information About Author:

Belozyorova E. Yu., Сandidate of Philologiсal Sciences, Lecturer, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (pr. Leningradskiy, 49, Moscow, Russian Federation, 125993). E-mail: ebelozerova@hotmail.com

Introduction. The given analysis is about 475 modern phraseological units that contribute to the formation of the phraseological picture of the world. The study examines the relationship of semantics and the form of phraseological units, due to the situation of communication. The phraseology of a language as part of the linguistic picture of the world is included in the framework of the study of cognitive linguistics. Aim. This study is aimed at identifying and describing modern phraseological units, as an example of allegorical expression in the communication process to achieve certain cognitive goals. Material and methods. The presented empirical material in the article is an actual selection from a modern literary text (Under My Skin, The Door That Led To Where, End Game, Liccle Bit, The Art of Being Normal – 2015 publication). Examples were obtained by reading fiction of modern British authors (J. Dawson, S. Gardner, A. Gibbons, A. Wheatle, L. Williamson), by the method of continuous sampling. Results and discussion. The analysis allowed us to consider the cognitive aspect of phraseological units. It is established that a broad approach to the study of phraseology expands the boundaries of phraseological doctrine and allows you to consider more structural and semantic forms of phraseological units. The following modern phraseological units are considered and analyzed in the article: phraseological units, phraseological units derivatives and author formations. The semantic features of derivatives of phraseological units and copyright formations are analyzed in the framework of modern phraseology of the English language. It is shown that the structural complexity of phraseology is based on the cognitive aspect of its semantic structure. Conclusion. The analysis made it possible to identify the structural range of phraseological units and consider their transformative processes according to semantics and situational use. The study shows that the modification of phraseological structures and the introduction of new idiomatic phrases (derivatives of phraseological units and author’s idiomatic expressions) are due to linguistic and cultural needs in the expression of society. All analyzed modern phraseological units of the English language are considered as operational units of thinking of the present time and are a means of reflecting the linguistic picture as a whole. The linguistic picture of the world is a reflection of the external and internal world of a person, his thinking and speech. The modern phraseology of the English language reflects changes in human comprehension, understanding and interpretation of the outside world. The phraseological unit has a complex structure and belongs to a special linguistic category, which leads to an increase in the interest of cognitive research. Thus, the study of phraseology at this stage should be focused on the phraseological unit, its meaning and its usage.

Keywords: cognitive phraseology, modern phraseological units, derivation of phraseological units, semantics and structure, modern vocabulary of the English language

References:

1. Zabrosayeva I. A. Osobennosti kognitivnoy lingvistiki [Features of cognitive linguistics]. Privolzhskiy nauchnyy vestnik – Privolzhsky Scientific Journal, 2014, no. 12-1 (40) (in Russian).

2. Shkatova V. V. Frazeologicheskaya kartina mira kak ob″ekt lingvisticheskogo izucheniya [Phraseological picture of the world as an object of linguistic study]. Vestnik LGU im. A. S. Pushkina – Vestnik of Pushkin Leningrad State University, 2012, no. 1, pp. 208–215 (in Russian).

3. Gardner S. The Door That Led To Where. London: Hot Key Books, 2015. 276 p.

4. CDAI – Cambridge Dictionary of American Idioms. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003. 499 p.

5. Williamson L. The Art of Being Normal. Oxford, David Fickling Books, 2015. 357 p.

6. Spears R. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs. New York, McGraw-Hill Education, 2002.

7. Gibbons A. End Game. United Kingdom, Orion Children’s Books, 2015. 202 p.

8. FDI – Farlex Dictionary of Idioms, Farlex Inc., 2015. URL: www.thefreedictionary.com (accessed 15 October 2019).

9. Kunin A. V. Kurs frazeologii sovremennogo angliyskogo yazyka: uchebnik dlya institutov i fakul’tetov inostrannykh yazykov [Modern English Phraseology Course: textbook for institutes and faculties of foreign languages]. Moscow, Vysshaya Shkola Publ., Dubna, Feniks Publ., 1996. 381 p. (in Russian).

10. Mokiyenko V. M. Slavyanskaya frazeologiya [Slavic phraseology]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1989. 207 p. (in Russian).

11. Wheatle A. Liccle Bit. London: Atom Books, 2015. 281 p.

12. Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12th ed. 2014.

13. Pochuyeva N. N. Frazeologicheskiy kontsept: sushchnost’ i struktura (na materiale russkogo i angliyskogo yazykov) [Phraseological concept: essence and structure (based on Russian and English languages)]. European science, 2017, no. 8 (30) (in Russian).

14. CID – Cambridge Idioms Dictionary, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006. 520 p.

15. Fedulenkova T. N. Variantnost’ angliyskikh frazeologizmov modeli V + (d) + N + Prep + ö s glagolom ‘have’ [Variant of English phraseological models V + (d) + N + Prep + ö with the verb ‘have’]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki – Vestnik of Pomor University. Series “Humanitarian and Social Sciences”, 2019, no. 3, pp. 55–62 (in Russian).

16. Belozyorova E. Yu. Frazeologicheskaya kartina mira v sovremennoy podrostkovoy britanskoy khudozhestvennoy literature. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Phraseological picture of the world in modern teenage British fiction. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Moscow, 2017. 187 p. (in Russian).

17. Urban Dictionary. URL: www.urbandictionary.com/ (accessed 20 October 2019).

18. Baranov A. N., Dobrovol’skiy D. O. Aspekty teorii frazeologii [Aspects of the theory of phraseology]. Moscow, Znak Publ., 2008. 656 p. (in Russian).

19. Dawson J. Under My Skin. London: Hot Key Books, 2015. 302 p.

20. MGHDAS – McGraw-Hill’s Dictionary of American Slang and Colloquial Expressions. New York, McGraw-Hill Education, 2006. 460 p.

belozerova_e._y._80_87_5_211_2020.pdf ( 418.05 kB ) belozerova_e._y._80_87_5_211_2020.zip ( 411.09 kB )

Issue: 5, 2020

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF MODERN LINGUISTICS

Pages: 80 — 87

Downloads: 1493

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU