ART IN WORDS: EKPHRASTIC REPRESENTATIONS OF PAINTINGS IN THE NOVELS BY D. RUBINA AND M. ATWOOD
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2021-3-92-101
Introduction. The present paper examines a literary figure of ekphrasis and its implementation through intertextual references in fiction. Despite how relatively ‘researched’ the phenomenon of ekphrasis is, the overwhelming majority of existing works focuses on the transfer of meaning between the verbal and visual mediums. This approach omits the reader’s possible interpretation of ekphrastic descriptions and their stylistic expression in texts. The aim of the research is to carry out a linguistic analysis of ekphrastic intertextual references and their possible impact on the reader’s perception of a fictional text. Material and methods. The study is based on ekphrastic abstracts from the novels by Dina Rubina ‘On the Sunny Side of the Street’ and Margaret Atwood’s ‘Cat’s Eye’. The research methodology uses the following techniques of cognitive poetics: the figure-ground dichotomy, the model of literary resonance, the theory of narrative interrelation. Results and discussion. The cognitive poetic analysis of the ekphrastic representations of characters has shown: • intertextual references link scenes within a narrative; • intertextual references supply additional symbolic and metaphorical meanings to an artwork; • intertextual references imitate the visual organisation of an art object at the syntactic, semantic and textual levels. Conclusion. Using cognitive poetic methods of linguistic analysis, we examined stylistic expression of ekphrasis in a literary text. Taking the role of a figure, the character depicted in the painting acts as a pronounced attractor when influencing the reader’s perception. This perceptual influence is confirmed by the typical semantic, syntactic and stylistic characteristics of attractors presented in the analysed passages. Comparison of the ekphrastic descriptions and the corresponding context revealed the parallelism of the used constructions, which indicates a similar organisation of their figure-background relations. Parallelism can be also marked as specific intertextual references, through which an art object is actualised in the reader’s mind. In addition to the contextual environment, intertextual references contribute to the symbolic realisation of a character in a literary text, complementing their representation with metaphorical and conceptual meanings.
Keywords: ekphrasis, intertextual reference, cognitive poetics, figure, ground, attractor, narrative interrelation, ekphrastic representation
References:
1. Zhurbina A. V. Ekfrasis [Ekphrasis]. Bol’shaya rossiyskaya entsiklopediya. Volume 35. Moscow, 2017. Pp. 293 (in Russian).
2. Webb R. Ekphrasis ancient and modern: The invention of a genre. Word & Image, 1999, no. 15 (1), рр. 7–18.
3. Hollander J. The gazer’s spirit: poems speaking to silent works of art. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995. 392 p.
4. Krieger M. Ekphrasis: the illusion of the natural sign. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2019. 293 p.
5. Mitchell W. J. T. Ekphrasis and the other. Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. 1994. Pр. 151–181.
6. Hollander J. The poetics of ekphrasis. Word & Image, 1988, no. 4 (1), pp. 209–219.
7. Heffernan J. A. W. Museum of words: The poetics of ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004. 262 p.
8. Cheeke S. Writing for art: The aesthetics of ekphrasis. Manchester: Mancherster University Press, 2010. 216 p.
9. Braginskaya N. V. Ekfrasis kak tip teksta (k probleme strukturnoy klasifikatsii) [Ekphrasis as a type of a text (to the issue of structural classification]. Slavyanskoye i balkanskoye yazykoznaniye [Slavic and Balkan linguistics].1977. Pp. 259–283 (in Russian).
10. Geller L. Na podstupakh k zhanru ekfrasisa. Russkiy fon dlya nerusskikh kartin [Approaching ekphrasis as a genre. Russian background for non-Russian paintings]. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 1997, issue 44, pp. 151–171 (in Russian).
11. Rubins M. Plasticheskaya radost’ krasoty: Ekfrasis v tvorchestve akmeistov i evropeyskaya traditsiya [Figurative joy of beauty: Ekphrasis in art of acmeists and European tradition]. Saint-Petersburg, Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2003. 354 p. (in Russian).
12. Ekfrasis v russkoy literature. Trudy Lozannskogo simpoziuma. Pod. red. L. Gellera [Ekphrasis in Russian literature. Works of Lausanne symposium. Ed. L. Geller]. Moscow, MIK Publ., 2002. 216 p. (in Russian).
13. «Nevyrazimo vyrazimoye». Ekfrasis i problemy reprezentatsii vizual’nogo v khudozhestvennom tekste. Pod red. D. V. Tokareva [‘Inexpressibly Expressive’. Ekphrasis and problems of visual representation in fictional texts. Ed. D. V. Tokarev]. Moscow, Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 2013. 572 p. (in Russian).
14. Teoriya i istoriya ekfrasisa: Itogi i perspektivy izucheniya. Pod redaktsiyey T. Avtukhovich [Theory and history of ekphrasis: Conclusions and perspectives of its research. Ed. by T. Avtukhovich]. Sedl’tse, 2018. 703 p. (in Russian).
15. Tsur R. Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1992. 586 p.
16. Stockwell P. Cognitive poetics: An introduction. 2nd edition. London: Routledge, 2019. 256 p.
17. Evans V., Green M. C. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. 848 p.
18. Ungeger F., Schmid H.-J. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. 2nd edition. London, Longman Publ., 2013. 384 p.
19. Stockwell P. Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009. 224 p.
20. Stockwell P. The cognitive poetics of literary resonance. Language and cognition, 2009, no. 1 (1), pp. 25–44.
21. Mason J. Narrative. In: P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. P. 179–195.
22. Mason J. Narrative interrelation, intertextuality and teachers’ knowledge of students’ reading. In: D. Clayton & M. Giovanelli (eds.) Knowing about language: Linguistics and the secondary English classroom. London: Routledge, 2016. P. 162–172.
23. Mason J. Intertextuality in practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2019. 216 p.
24. Shklovskiy V. B. O teorii prozy [On the theory of prose]. Moscow, Ardis Publ., 1929. 269 p. (in Russian).
25. Talmy L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. 573 p.
26. Langacker R. W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991. 628 p.
27. Rubina D. Na solnechnoy storone ulitsy [On the sunny side of the street]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2012. 512 p. (in Russian).
28. Werth P. Extended metaphor – A text-world account. Language and literature, 1994, no. 3 (2), pp. 79–103.
29. Werth P. Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. London: Routledge, 1999. 390 p.
30. Ronell A. P. Some thoughts on Russian-language Israeli fiction: Introducing Dina Rubina. Prooftexts, 2008, no. 28 (2), pp. 197–231.
31. Guseva O. P. Poet kak tsentral’naya figura romana Diny Rubinoy «Na solnechnoy storone ulitsy» [Poet as a central character in Dina Rubina’s Novel ‘On the sunny side of the street’]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Herald of Vyatka State University, 2013, no. 2 (2), pp. 95–99 (in Russian).
32. Atwood M. Cat’s Eye. London: Virago Press, 1990. 487 p.
( 453.35 kB ) 
( 442.83 kB )
Issue: 3, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: GERMANIC AND COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS
Pages: 92 — 101
Downloads: 1280