EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES AS A TOOL FOR IMPLEMENTING HUMAN CAPITAL’S FORMATION: THE EXPERIENCE OF FOREIGN PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2022-2-69-76
Introduction. The purpose of this research is to analyze the educational practices of foreign private universities of human capital’s formation. With the main focus on such countries as Great Britain, Germany, China, India, Singapore and the United States, a comparative analysis and key features of educational practices of the world’s leading private universities of human capital’s formation are presented. Material and methods. The research material was English-language sources, official websites of the world’s leading private universities: University of Massachusetts, Stanford University, University of Pennsylvania (USA), Jacobs University of Bremen and Zeppelin University (Germany), National University of Singapore (NUS), etc. Analysis of leading private universities’ educational practices, which made it possible to reveal and substantiate the educational practices’ key characteristics in human capital formation. Results and discussion. The educational practices’ key characteristics of the world’s leading universities as a tool for realizing human capital are the following: – autonomy of a private university, characterized by its own independent design of the university management’s strategy and policy and educational process – knowledge interdisciplinary synthesis based on the various scientific research’s integration and the widespread use of modern educational technologies. Creation of interdisciplinary institutes and multi-university programs; – high concentration of talents of all educational process’ subjects, where the main factor in the human capital formation in a private university is the privilege of selective selection of students with high academic performance, attracting famous scientists to research; – universities network interaction with the industrial sphere in the light of personnel training. The main form of networking is the corporate universities creation; – universities consortium, which is a single university that forms a unified brand with a centralized structure; – effective fundraising system that ensures the productive human capital formation. The main source is income from own scientific and practical developments carried out on a contractual basis by public and private firms; – research reputation. Advanced scientific and practical developments, characterized by productivity. Research developments directly depend on the universities autonomy, the greater of a university`s autonomy, the freer it is in choosing research areas. Conclusion. The modern education system acts as an integrator of the interests of the individual and society, predetermining the development of mankind for many years to come. The experience of a foreign private higher school shows that educational practices are an effective mechanism in the formation of human capital. The human capital acquired in the process of learning changes the quality of a person’s life, has a direct impact on his intellectual, creative and cultural level.
Keywords: educational practices, human capital formation, private university
References:
1. Mudrik A. V. Sotsial’no-pedagogicheskiye problem sotsializatsii [Socio-pedagogical problems of socialization]. Moscow, MGPU Publ., 2016. 256 p. (in Russian)
2. Brown university. URL: https://www.brown.edu/ (accessed 14 March 2021).
3. Stanford University. URL: https://www.stanford.edu (accessed 20 November 2021).
4. University of Pennsylvania. URL: https://www.upenn.edu (accessed 20 November 2021).
5. Yale University. URL: https://www.yale.edu (accessed 20 November 2021).
6. Uchastiye v upravlenii universitetom [Participation in the management of the university]. Ed. O. Bychkova. Saint Petersburg, Norma Publ., 2016. 120 p. (in Russian).
7. Massachusetskiy tekhnologicheskiy universitet [Massachusetts Institute of Technology] (in Russian). URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Массачусетский_технологический_институт (accessed 20 April 2021).
8. Cronin. C. Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2017, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 14–34.
9. Bali M. Framing Open Educational Practices from a Social Justice Perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020 (1): 10, pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.565
10. White A. Understanding the University and Faculty Investment in Implementing High-Impact Educational Practices. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 118–135. DOI: 10.14434/josotl.v18i2.23143.
11. Cronin C., MacLaren I. Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in Open Educational Practices. Open Praxis. Open Education Global Conference Selected Papers, 2018, vol. 10, issue 2, pp. 127–143. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.825
12. Ehlers U.-D. Extending the Territory: From Open Educational Resources to Open Educational Practices. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 2011, no. 15 (2), pp. 1–10.
13. Yang P. Educational Mobility and Transnationalization. In: Gleason N. (eds). Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325899241_Educational_Mobility_and_Transnationalization (accessed 27 March 2021). DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0_3
14. Jacobs University Bremen. URL: https://www.jacobsuniversity.de/study/undergraduate/programs?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIl_7V0LiN9AIVOWxvBB3rVAW9EAAYASAAEgK6-fD_BwE (accessed 21 February 2021).
15. Global mit. URL: https://global.mit.edu/programs/ (accessed 30 August 2021).
16. Salmi D. Sozdaniye universitetov mirovogo klassa [Creation of world-class universities]. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ., 2009. 134 p. (in Russian).
17. The University of Chicago. URL: https://www.uchicago.edu (accessed 20 November 2021).
18. Estrada F., García-Prieto F., Conde-Vélez S. Learning Styles in University Students: Types of Strategies, Materials, Supports, Evaluation and Performance. Case Study. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2020, no. 9 (2), pp. 394–416. DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2020.2.394
19. Wolff L. Education and training: The task ahead. In: P. P. Kuczynski, J. Williamson (Eds.). After the Washington consensus. Restarting growth and reform in Latin America. Washington, D.C.: Institute of International Economics, 2003.
20. Tsiguleva O. V., Pozdeeva S. I. Human capital`s humanitarianization in the anthropological approach context to education. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2021, no. 467, pp. 88–92. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/467/11
( 759.02 kB ) 
( 745.87 kB )
Issue: 2, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: PROFESSIONAL TRAINING
Pages: 69 — 76
Downloads: 1297