Communicative behavior of the author’s linguistic personality and its discursive conditionality (based on the work of V. V. Mayakovsky)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2024-4-16-23
Modern cognitive-discursive linguistics focuses on the study of discursive personality. Interest in the study of the communicative behavior of a linguistic personality is due to the general turn of modern linguistics to the problem of “language and man”; The focus of linguists is on issues of communicative organization and communicative behavior of native speakers of different types of languages. The article examines the relationship between the communicative behavior of the author’s linguistic personality and its discursive conditioning. The initial parameter in the description of a linguistic personality is a speech work, therefore the linguistic personality of the author in the texts he creates and the discourses reflected in them are examined. Current trends in text research indicate a growing interest in not only the internal structure and linguistic characteristics of texts, but also their social and communicative role. This provides the opportunity for a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of textual material as a means of communication and a product of the linguistic activity of a particular person. In this regard, the study of the author’s linguistic personality in the context of textual manifestations within a certain discourse represents a pressing problem in modern linguistics. Discourse analysis allows you to integrate a wide range of factors, including cognitive, psychological and pragmatic, into the study of linguistic personality. A linguistic personality manifests its belonging to a specific ethnic group, professional field, age and gender identity in discursive practices. Discourse serves as a platform for the manifestation of emotional states, which play a significant role in the organization of communicative interaction. The linguistic personality in the texts he projects uses various communicative strategies, which represent a complex of speech actions taken in order to achieve a certain communicative result. Their implementation is carried out through the use of various communication tactics. A person who participates in discourses of various types and displays specific tendencies in his communicative and speech behavior in them is considered polydiscursive. The author of the texts actively participates in the development of various discourses, and through them specific tendencies of his communicative behavior appear, revealing the unique features of his polydiscursive linguistic personality.
Keywords: communicative behavior, linguistic personality of the author, polydiscursive linguistic personality, Vladimir Vladimirovich Mayakovsky
References:
1. Bogin G. I. Obreteniye sposobnosti ponimat’: vvedeniye v filologichekuyu germenevtiku [Gaining the ability to understand: introduction to philological hermeneutics]. Moscow, Psychology and Business Online Publ., 2001. 516 p. (in Russian).
2. Ivantsova E. V. O termine “yazykovaya lichnost’”: istoki, problemy, perspektivy ispol’zovaniya [About the term “linguistic personality”: origins, problems, prospects for use]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2010, no. 4 (12), pp. 24–32 (in Russian).
3. Vorkachev S. G. Lingvokul’turologiya, yazykovaya lichnost’, kontsept: stanovleniye antropotsentricheskoy paradigmy v yazykoznanii [Linguoculturology, linguistic personality, concept: the formation of an anthropocentric paradigm in linguistics]. Filologicheskiye nauki – Philological Sciences, 2001, no. 1, pp. 64‒72 (in Russian).
4. Asratyan Z. D. Yazykovaya lichnost’ obraza avtora v khudozhestvennom diskurse [Linguistic personality of the image of the author in artistic discourse]. Gumanitarnyye issledovaniya. Zhurnal fundamental’nykh i prikladnykh issledovaniy – Humanitarian research. Journal of Basic and Applied Research, 2016, no. 2 (58), pp. 76‒80 (in Russian).
5. Karaulov Yu. N. Russkiy yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost’ [Russian language and linguistic personality]. Moscow, LKI Publ., 2010. 264 p. (in Russian).
6. Kochnova K. A. Yazykovaya kartina mira pisatelya: aspekty i metody issledovaniya [The writer’s linguistic picture of the world: aspects and research methods]. Vestnik VSU, 2015, no. 3, pp. 53–56 (in Russian).
7. Makarov M. L. Osnovy teorii diskursa [Fundamentals of discourse theory]. Moscow, Gnosis Publ., 2003. 280 p. (in Russian).
8. Dyck T. A. van. Yazyk. Poznaniye. Kommunikatsiya: perevod s angliyskogo [Language. Cognition. Communication: translation from English]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989. 310 p. (in Russian).
9. Vokhrysheva E. V. Kommunikativnyye strategii dialogicheskogo vzaimodeystviya v novoangliyskom yazyke. Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Communicative strategies of dialogic interaction in the New English language. Abstract of thesis doc. philol. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Publ., 2001. 26 p. (in Russian).
10. Foucault M. Arkheologiya znaniya [Archeology of knowledge]. Saint Petersburg, IC “Humanitarian Academy” Publ., 2004. 416 p. (in Russian).
11. Kubryakova E. S., Aleksandrova O. V. Vidy prostranstva, teksta i diskursa [Types of space, text and discourse]. Moscow, Dialog: Moscow State University Publ., 1997. Pp. 19–20 (in Russian).
12. Sternin I. A. Eksperimental’noye izucheniye kategorii russkiy kommunikativnyy ideal [Experimental study of the category of Russian communicative ideal]. Mir russkogo slova – World of Russian Word, 2003, no. 2, pp. 53‒55 (in Russian).
13. Shakhovskiy V. I. Yazykovaya lichnost’ v emotsional’noy kommunikativnoy situatsii [Language personality in an emotional communicative situation]. Volgograd, 1998. no. 2. Pp. 43–47 (in Russian).
14. Revzina O. G. Diskurs i diskursivnyye formatsii [Discourse and discursive formations]. Kritika i semiotika [Criticism and semiotics]. Novosibirsk, NSU Publ., 2005. Pр. 66–78 (in Russian).
15. Beloglazova E. V. Polidiskursnost’ kak osobyy issledovatel’skiy fokus [Polydiscourse as a special research focus]. Izvestiya SPbUEF, 2009, no. 3, pp. 66‒71 (in Russian).
16. Tkhorik V. I. Yazykovaya lichnost’: lingvokul’turologicheskiy aspekt [Language personality: Linguistic and cultural aspect]. Krasnodar, 2000. 304 p. (in Russian).
17. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnyye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi [Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2006. 288 p. (in Russian).
18. Karasik V. I. Kharakteristiki pedagogicheskogo diskursa [Characteristics of pedagogical discourse]. Yazykovaya lichnost’; problemy lingvokul’turologii: nauchnyye trudy [Language personality; Problems of linguoculturology and functional semantics: scientific works]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 1999. Pp. 3–18 (in Russian).
19. Pirogova Yu. K. Implitsitnaya informatsiya kak sredstvo kommunikativnogo vozdeystviya i manipulirovaniya [Implicit information as a means of communicative influence and manipulation]. Saint Petersburg, Problemy prikladnoy linguistiki Publ., 2001. 209 p. (in Russian).
20. Mayakovskiy V. V. Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy: v 13 tomakh [Complete works: in 13 volumes]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1961. 223 p. (in Russian).
( 414.98 kB ) 
( 410.63 kB )
Issue: 4, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: THEORETICAL AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS
Pages: 16 — 23
Downloads: 279