AUTHOR MODEL OF LITERARY TEXT AS A SYNTHESIS OF THE EXPRESSIVE POSSIBILITIES OF THE KIND OF LITERATURE
The article is dedicated to finding new scientific ideas about the forms of contemporary literature. Noting that instead of differentiating, regulatory paradigm of the genre in the nineteenth – XXI centuries comes looser, synthesizing one, the authors propose to consider non-classical, non-canonical works of the newest forms of literature as author’s models. Such model performs the function of genres, but have a new degree of freedom. New degree of freedom is determined by the authors, firstly, by using the product of the expressive possibilities of different genres of the single ancestral paradigm, and secondly, by the orientation not on the form of the genre but on the well-known plot, motive, the situation of the repertoire of world culture or an event of actual reality. Key concepts: the literary kind, genres, non-classical form, the epic and lyric drama, Pushkin, Blok, Mayakovsky, the author's model, the cultural model.
Keywords: literary genus, genres, non-canonical form, epic and lyric drama, Pushkin, Blok, Mayakovsky, creation as the author’s model of the text, cultural model
References:
1. Tamarchenko N. D. Methodological problems of the theory of gender and genre in the poetry of the twentieth century. Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences. A series of language and literature. Moscow, 2001, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 3–13 (in Russian).
2. Theory of Literature. Moscow: IMLI RAN Publ., 2003. Vol. 3: Genera and genres (the main problems in the development of historical interpretation.). 592 p. (in Russian).
3. Golovchiner V. E. Trends genre- generic changes in Russian literature of the twentieth century. Russian Literature of the XX–XXI: theory and methodology of the study: Proceedings of the Third International Scientifi c Conference (4–5 December. 2008 ). Moscow, Izd-vo MGU Publ., 2008. Pp. 10–14 (in Russian).
4. Rusanova O. N. Motive in the Aspect of Historical Poetics. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2006, no. 8 (59), pp. 120–126 (in Russian).
5. Pushkin A. S. CAP in ten volumes. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1979 (in Russian).
6. Tolstoy L. N. Collection of works in twenty-two volumes. Vol. X. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1981 (in Russian).
7. Tolstoy about literature. Articles. Letters. Diaries. Moscow, 1955 (in Russian).
8. History of Russian Soviet literature. In 4 volumes. Vol. 1. 1917–1929. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1967 (in Russian).
9. Erdman N. Plays. Sideshows. Letters. Documents. Memoirs of contemporaries. Moscow, 1990. 448 p. (in Russian).
10. Golovchiner V. E. Dramaturgy of Erdman N. in the Soviet and post-Soviet perception. Russian literature in the modern cultural space. Proceedings of the III All-Russian Scientifi c. confer. Part. 2. Tomsk, 2005. Pp. 94–100 (in Russian).
11. Stepin V. S. Theoretical knowledge. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2000. 744 p. (in Russian).
12. Brecht B. Theatre. In 5 vol. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ. 1963–1964 (in Russian).
13. Chirkov A. S. The epic drama (theory and poetics). Kiev, Vishcha Shkola Publ., 1988. 160 p.
14. Chirkov A. S. The epic drama. Problems of the theory. Poetics. Kiev, 1989. 35 p.
15. Aristotle. Poetics. Moscow, GIHL Publ., 1956. 183 p. (in Russian).
16. Golovchiner V. E. The epic drama in Russian literature of the twentieth century. Tomsk, Izd-vo Tomskogo gos. ped. un-ta Publ., 2007. 320 p. (in Russian).
17. Belinsky V. G. Aesthetics and literary criticism. In 2 vol., Moscow, 1959. Vol. 1 (in Russian).
18. Block A. Collection of works in 6 volumes. Moscow, 1971. Vol. 2. 477 p. (in Russian).
19. Fomenko I. V. Lyrical drama – Myth or Reality? Drama and Theatre: collection of scientifi c. works. Tver, Tver gos. un-t Publ., 2002. Issue. III. Pp. 23–27 (in Russian)
20. Gogol N. V. Collection of works in 8 vols. Vol. 4. Moscow, Pravda Publ., 1984. 430 p. (in Russian).
( 434.63 kB ) 
( 427.29 kB )
Issue: 7, 2014
Series of issue: Issue 7
Rubric: THEORY OF LITERATURE
Pages: 178 — 185
Downloads: 1726