Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 14.02.2026
Home Issues 2019 Year Issue №7 FIGURATIVE LEXICAL AND PHRASEOLOGICAL REPRESENTATIONS OF CELESTIAL BODIES CONCEPTS IN THE ARTISTIC PICTURE OF THE WORLD OF THE NOVEL THE MASTER AND MARGARITA BY M. BULGAKOV
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

FIGURATIVE LEXICAL AND PHRASEOLOGICAL REPRESENTATIONS OF CELESTIAL BODIES CONCEPTS IN THE ARTISTIC PICTURE OF THE WORLD OF THE NOVEL THE MASTER AND MARGARITA BY M. BULGAKOV

Zhu Z.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-7-63-71

Information About Author:

Zhixue Zhu, National Research Tomsk State University (pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050). E-mail: chzhisyue217@yandex.ru

Introduction. The article discusses the figurative representations of the concepts of the heavenly bodies in the text and the artistic picture of the world of M. Bulgakov’s novel The Master and Margarita. The elements of the lexical structure of the text are analyzed, representing the images of the sun, the moon and the star, in terms of their linguistic semantics and cultural connotations associated with the mythopoetic symbolism of these space objects, as well as in the aspect of their participation in the expression of the author’s picture of the world. The purpose of the work is to explore the ways of representing the concepts of heavenly bodies (the sun, the moon and the stars) in the text of the novel The Master and Margarita, to identify aspects of their metaphorical and symbolic interpretation on the verbal and conceptual levels, to study the role of these concepts in the artistic picture of the world of the novel. Material and methods. The methodology of the work is based on cognitive, linguistic-cultural and system-structural approaches to the study of the imagery of language and artistic speech, used in the field of semantics of language units and text stylistics. The empirical material is represented by figurative words and expressions (200 units) representing the concepts of the Sun, the Moon, and the Star in M. Bulgakov’s novel The Master and Margarita, as well as fragments of text demonstrating their metaphorical functioning (850 contexts). As the sources for determining linguistic meanings and mythopoetic symbolism served the explanatory and encyclopedic dictionaries. Results and discussion. The lexical and textual fund of artistic representations of the concepts “Sun”, “Moon”, “Star” in the novel The Master and Margarita by M. Bulgakov is defined; methods and techniques of their textual implementation are revealed. The cultural and symbolic meanings of the concepts of the heavenly bodies, represented in the folk mythology of different cultures, are studied. The aspects of the metaphorical and symbolic interpretation of these concepts in the artistic picture of the world of the novel “The Master and Margarita”, as well as their role in the expression of the author’s intention, are described. Conclusion. The artistic model of the world in the novel The Master and Margarita represents a complex and multidimensional system of concepts, which in many respects comes close to folk mythology and religious cosmology. The most significant role in it is played by the images of the sun, the moon and the stars, by means of which the space-time continuum is modeled; the characteristics of the main characters, key characters and related events are expressed; the moral and philosophical content of the entire work is broadcast

Keywords: concept, heavenly bodies, imaginative representations, M. Bulgakov, The Master and Margarita, artistic picture of the world

References:

1. Babushkin A. P. Tipy kontseptov v leksiko-frazeologicheskoy semantike yazyka [Types of concepts in the lexical and phraseological semantics of the language]. Voronezh, Voronezh University Publ., 1996. 104 p. (in Russian).

2. Askol’dov S. A. Kontsept i slovo [Concept and the word]. Russkaya slovesnost’. Ot teorii slovesnosti k strukture teksta: antologiya [Russian literature. From the theory of literature to the structure of the text: anthology]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 1997. P. 269 (in Russian).

3. Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty: slovar’ russkoy kul’tury. Opyt issledovaniya [Constants: Dictionary of Russian culture. Research experience]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1997. P. 41 (in Russian).

4. Telia V. N. Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokul’turnyy aspekty [Russian Phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1996. 285 p. (in Russian).

5. Kolesov V. V. Kontsept kul’tury: obraz – ponyatiye – simvol [The concept of culture: image – concept – symbol]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta – Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University, 1992, vol. 2 (2), pp. 17–25 (in Russian).

6. Lyapin S. K. Kontseptologiya: k stanovleniyu podkhoda [Conceptology: to the formation of an approach]. Kontsepty: nauchnyye trudy Tsentrokontsepta. Arhangelsk, PomorSU Publ., 1997. Pp. 18–19 (in Russian).

7. Karasik V. I. Yazykovaya lichnost’: aspekty lingvistiki i lingvodidaktiki: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Language personality: aspects of linguistics and linguistic didactics: collection of scientific works]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 1999. 195 p. (in Russian).

8. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [The language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2002. 477 p. (in Russian).

9. Shvedova N. Yu. K opredeleniyu kontsepta kak predmeta yazykoznaniya [To the definition of the concept as a subject of linguistics]. Yazykovaya lichnost’: tekst, slovar’, obraz mira. K 70-letiyu chl.-korr. RAN Yu. N. Karaulova: sbornik statey [Language personality: text, dictionary, image of the world. To the 70th anniversary of Corresponding Member of RAS Yu. N. Karaulov: collection of articles]. Moscow, RUDN Publ., 2006. P. 508 (in Russian).

10. Ogneva E. A. Kognitivnoye modelirovaniye kontseptosfery khudozhestvennogo teksta [Cognitive modeling of the concept sphere of an artistic text]. Moscow, Editorial Publ., 2013. 282 p. (in Russian).

11. Tarasova I. А. Khudozhestvennyy kontsept: dialog lingvistiki i literaturovedeniya [Artistic concept: the dialogue of linguistics and literary criticism]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta imeni N. I. Lobachevskogo – Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod, 2010, no. 4 (2), pp. 742–745 (in Russian).

12. Miller L. V. Khudozhestvennyy kontsept kak smyslovaya i esteticheskaya kategoriya [The artistic concept as a semantic and aesthetic category]. Mir russkogo slova – The World of Russian Word, 2000, no. 4, pp. 39–45 (in Russian).

13. Bulgakov M. A. Master i Margarita [The Master and Margarita]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2012. 416 p. (in Russian).

14. Tresidder D. Slovar’ simvolov [Dictionary of characters]. Moscow, FAIR-PRESS Publ., 1999. 448 p. (in Russian).

15. Ivanov V. V. Mify narodov mira: entsiklopediya [Myths of the nations of the world: Encyclopedia]. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 1980. P. 461 (in Russian).

16. Slavyanskaya mifologiya: entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Slavic mythology: encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya Publ., 2011. P. 97 (in Russian).

17. Adamchik M. V. Slovar’ simvolov [Dictionary of symbols]. Minsk, Kharvest Publ., 2010. 224 p. (in Russian).

chzhu_chzhisyuye_.._63_71_7_204_2019.pdf ( 469.44 kB ) chzhu_chzhisyuye_.._63_71_7_204_2019.zip ( 458.18 kB )

Issue: 7, 2019

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: ISSUES OF COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS

Pages: 63 — 71

Downloads: 1483

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU