Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 10.04.2026
Home Issues 2025 Year Issue №5 Kulback-Leibler measure as a means of assessment learning process performance
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Kulback-Leibler measure as a means of assessment learning process performance

Alyabysheva Y.A., Veryayev A.A., Losychenko Y.E.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2025-5-132-143

Information About Author:

Alyabysheva Yu.A., Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Altai State Pedagogical University (ul. Molodezhnaya, 55, Barnaul, Russian Federation, 656031). E-mail: alyabysheva_y@mail.ru; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0619-9984; SPIN-code: 6039-3970, AuthorID: 797659 Veryaev A.A., Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Altai State Pedagogical (ul. Molodezhnaya, 55, Barnaul, Russian Federation, 656031). E-mail: veryaev_aa@mail.ru; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4338-0811, Scopus Profile: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7801339311; Web of Science Profile: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/U-8586-2017; SPIN Code: 8344-3280; AuthorID: 117346 Lozychenko Yu.E., Senior Lecturer, Branch of the Russian State Social University (ul. Turgeneva, 26, Anapa, Russian Federation, 353440). E-mail: uliya_l@mail.ru; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6602-1158; SPIN-code: 6106-2761, AuthorID: 710458

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the approach developed by the authors to assess the current performance of students using the Kullback-Leibler information measure. The methods used are informational, statistical methods. They found their application to the analysis of event pedagogy. The key events under investigation in the article are the results of computerized testing. They can be considered as random events that are influenced by different circumstances and the events are difficult to control. The paper uses the well-known Kullback-Leibler information method. In order for an information method to become a working applied technology, it must be accompanied by a number of additional procedures and tasks related to 1) the preparation of data for the calculations, 2) the calculations themselves, taking into account the limitations and fulfilment of the applicability criteria of the method, and 3) possible techniques for analysing the results of the study. A description of these procedures can be found in the paper. The proposed method for evaluating student test scores takes into account expectations of student success based on prior academic achievement, as well as performance in the context of whole student group performance. In addition, the paper shows the consistency of the obtained results when comparing them with those obtained when using the Mann – Whitney method in pedagogy and psychology research in hypothesis testing. The scientific novelty of the work consists in building appropriate procedures with orientation on pedagogical applications. The presentation is based on the use of specific experimental data obtained as part of the current control after the study of a topic in physics. The practical significance of the work is seen in the possibility of applying the Kullback-Leibler measure to the study of the role of latent variables in the educational process, as well as in the course of experimental teaching by future candidates for degrees in pedagogy.

Keywords: testing, knowledge, control of the level of knowledge, hereditarity, IRT models, information measure, Kullback-Leibler divergence, probability measures, learning analytics emotiology, emotivity, emotive, emotive phonetic meaning (EPS), expressive-evaluative morpheme, emotive lexicon

References:

1. Kullback S. Teoriya informatsii i statistika [Information theory and statistics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976. 409 p. (in Russian).

2. Kullback S., Leibler R.A. On information and sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1951, no. 22 (1), pp. 79–86.

3. Zvonnikov V.I. Sovremennye sredstva otsenivaniya rezul’tatov obucheniya [Modern means of assessing learning outcomes] Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2007. 224 p. (in Russian).

4. Agal’tsov V.P. Kontrol’ znaniy – dominiruyushchaya sostavlyayushchaya obrazovatel’nogo protsessa [Knowledge control is a dominant component of the educational process]. Informatika i obrazovaniye, 2005, no. 2, pp. 94–96 (in Russian).

5. Bloom B.S., Engelhart M.D., Furst E.J., Hill W.H., Krathwohl D.R. Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals. NYC, David McKay Company, 1956. 216 p.

6. Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, Addison Wesley Longman, 2001. 333 p.

7. Handbook of Polytomous Item Response Theory Models. Edited by Michael L. Nering, Remo Ostini. Routledge, 2010. 307 p.

8. Kroker L., Algina Dzh. Vvedeniye v klassicheskuyu i sovremennuyu teoriyu testov [An introduction to classical and modern test theory]. Moccow, Logos Publ., 2010. 668 p. (in Russian).

9. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. 199 p.

10. Uchaikin V.V. Fractional Derivatives for Physicists and Engineers. Volume I: Background and Theory. Springer, 2013. 400 p.

11. Reckase M.D. The difficulty of test items that measure more than one dimension. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1985, no. 9, pp. 401–412.

12. Hadbook of Item Response Theory: Statistical Tools. Vol. 2 Edited by Wim J. van der Linden. CRC Press, 2016. 442 p.

13. Wind S., Hua C. Rasch Measurement Theory Analysis in R. New York: Chapman and Hal, 2022. 323 p.

14. D’Elia A., Piccolo D. A mixture model for preferences data analysis. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2005, no. 49, pp. 917–934. URL: https://www.labstat.it/home/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/0deec526a04cff09db000000-1.pdf (accessed 10 January 2025).

15. Corduas M. A statistical procedure for clustering ordinal data. Quaderni di statistica, 2008, no. 10, pp. 177–189. URL: https://www.labstat.it/home/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Corduas_2008.pdf (accessed 10 January 2025).

16. Bini M., Monari P., Piccolo D., Salmaso L. Statistical methods for the evaluation of educational services and quality of products, 2009. 243 p.

17. Alyabysheva Yu.A., Antonov A.Yu., Veryaev A.A. Tsifrovizatsiya tezaurusnogo podkhoda v obrazovanii [Digitalisation of the thesaurus approach in education]. Informatika i obrazovaniye, 2020, no. 1, pp. 51–58 (in Russian).

18. Bokova O.A., Veryaev A.A. Sub’’ektivnoye vospriyatiye neravenstva i nespravedlivosti shkol’nikami i studencheskoy molodezh’yu [Subjective perception of inequality and injustice by school and university students]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya – Perspectives of Science and Education, 2022; no. 2 (56), pp. 381–407 (in Russian).

19. Samawi H.M, Yin J., Zhang X., Yu L., Rochani H. et al. Kullback-Leibler Divergence for Medical Diagnostics Accuracy and Cut-point Selection Criterion: How it is related to the Youden Index. J Appl Bioinforma Comput Biol, 2020, vol. 9, no. 2. URL: https://www.scitechnol.com/peer-review/kullbackleibler-divergence-for-medical-diagnostics-accuracy-and-cutpoint-selection-criterion-how-it-is-related-to-the-youden-index-zT5p.php?article_id=11036 (accessed 10 January 2025).

20. Clim A., Zota R., Tinica G. Procedia. The Kullback-Leibler Divergence Used in Machine Learning Algorithms for Health Care Applications and Hypertension Prediction: A Literature Review. Computer Science, 2018, vol. 141, pp. 448–453.

21. Applications of Information Theory to Epidemiology. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy/special_issues/epidemic (accessed 10 January 2025).

22. Alyabysheva Yu.A., Veryaev A.A., Lozychenko Yu.E. Tekhnologiya prolongirovannogo otsenivaniya uchebnykh dostizheniy studentov pri ispol’ovanii informatsionnoy mery Kul’baka – Leyblera [Technology of prolonged assessment of students’ learning achievements using the Kulbak-Leibler information measure]. Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i metodika elektronnogo obucheniya: tsifrovye tekhnologii v obrazovanii: materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Krasnoyarsk, 24–27 sentyabrya 2024 g.: Chast’ 1 [Informatization of education and methods of e-learning: digital technologies in education: materials of the VIII International scientific conference Krasnoyarsk, September 24–27, 2024]. Krasnoyarsk, KSPU named after V.P. Astafyev Publ., 2024. Pp. 16–19 (in Russian).

23. Krichevets A.N., Korneev A.A., Rasskazova E.I. Osnovy statistiki dlya psikhologov [Fundamentals of statistics for psychologists]. Moscow, Akropol’ Publ., 2019. p. 286. (in Russian).

24. Korneev A.A., Krichevets A.N. Usloviya primenimosti kriteriev St’yudenta i Manna – Uitni [Conditions of applicability of Student’s and Mann–Whitney criteria]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2011, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 97–110 (in Russian).

25. Alyabysheva Yu.A., Barakina T.V., Beylin M.V. et al. Geymifikatsiya v kontekste vospriyatiya i formirovaniya predstavleniy o neravenstve i nespravedlivosti [Gamification in the context of perceptions and perceptions of inequality and injustice]. Barnaul, AltGPU Publ., 2022. 212 p. (in Russian).

26. Klarin M.V. Innovatsionnye modeli obucheniya: Issledovaniye mirovogo opyta [Innovative Models of Learning: A Study of Global Experiences]. Moscow, Luch Publ., 2016. 632 p. (in Russian).

27. Boltyshev M.G. Geymifikatsiya tsifrovogo obucheniya: aktual’nye problemy [Gamification of digital learning: current issues]. Informatika i obrazovaniye, 2022, no. 37 (3), pp. 28–34 (in Russian).

alyabysheva_yulia_anatolevna_132_143_5_241_2025.pdf ( 556.7 kB ) alyabysheva_yulia_anatolevna_132_143_5_241_2025.zip ( 549.1 kB )

Issue: 5, 2025

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: METHODOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION

Pages: 132 — 143

Downloads: 296

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU