Search
| # | Search | Downloads | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | . // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 1997. Issue 1 (1). P. 90-94 . | 1452 | ||||
| 2 | The article shows that cognitive sociology of science be¬ing a historical successor of sociology of knowledge that has based the determinism models of relations between mind processes and social forms has refused from naturalism and sociomorfism, subject-object model of knowledge and ob-jectivistic concept of knowledge. Having stated the principle of constructionism of reality in quality of epistemology ba¬sis, it is aimed at revealing of the connection of knowledge subject activity with natural processes, at «humaneness» of the object of research that is understood as the attitude constituting in consciousness. Keywords: - | 1484 | ||||
| 3 | In the article the analysis of the modern theory of knowledge is realized, it’s developmental trends indicated as “epistemic revolution” which directed to change the classical, science oriented theory of knowledge into socially-human synthetic view of gnoseological problems are lighted. The trends of historization, sociologization and axiologization of gnoseology marked as the main one’s in forming of the modern non-classical theory of knowledge and considered as the common strategy showed as the most shaped one in the intersubjects research “case-study” strategy. In the article it is showed that different versions of the interpretative paradigm, which develops in the frame of constructionist’s epistemic program, are considered as “theoretical background” of the researches made by means of the “case-study” method. | 1463 | ||||
| 4 | The article realizes the analysis of the modern theory of knowledge, indicates the tendencies of its development designated as “epistemic revolution”, which is directed to change the classical, science oriented theory of knowledge into socially-human synthetic view of gnoseological problems. The trends of historization, sociologization and axiologization of gnoseology marked as the main ones in forming the modern non-classical theory of knowledge are considered as the common strategy presented in the most shaped form in the interdisciplinary research “case-study” strategy. The article shows that different versions of the interpretative paradigm, which develops in the frame of constructionist’s epistemic program, are considered as “theoretical background” of the researches made by means of the “case-study” method. | 1731 | ||||
| 5 | The article shows that practical philosophy of I. Kant evoking disagreements today is a starting point while constructing post-modern ethic theories which comprise discussions on ethic perspectives and contours of post-modernity with a retrospective look at Kant’s project of moral philosophy. | 1758 | ||||
| 6 | Honesty, Openness, Unselfishness, Love, – at the individual, interpersonal and international levels – are the principles, which allow to establish peaceful inter-group communication and to resolve the conflicts, which are making a significant impact on peoples’ lives. The morals is the ground for all kind of human activities, and there must be little doubt that our future itself depends on the level of each person’s adherence to moral principles. As numerous historical examples show, an armed solution to the conflict can only put an end to the violent phase of conflicts but not to resolve them. This is especially clear when we examine the cases of ethnic and gender conflicts. The cardinal change of psychological and moral atmosphere, the formation of principles of global ethics in the system of interstate and interpersonal relations should facilitate the achievement of the final goal of the elimination of such conflicts. The global ethics are based on the idea that our future safety depends on the changes in human culture. However, the modern state of human culture can be determined as one in a deep crisis, and this crisis is first of all a moral one. This observation is of the major global ethics’ humanitarian value. | 1553 | ||||




