Search
| # | Search | Downloads | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The article is devoted to the analysis of cultural and genetic circuits of Neolithic and early metal (copper age) of the Upper Ob basin, presented in the national historiography of the second half of the 1970-ies – the beginnings of the 2010-ies. The work, as the second part of the synthesis of historiography research, includes a substantial characteristic of the third and fourth historical stages. The third stage (the second half of the 1970-ies and the first half of the 1980- ies) is linked to the research by V. I. Molodin. The fourth stage of the historiography of the second half of the 1980-ies – the beginning of 2010-ies) is represented by the works by V. I. Molodin, V. A. Zakh, J. F. Kirushin, V. V. Bobrov and N. Y. Kungurova. The genetic linkage of modern concepts with theoretical practices of the 1950-first half of the 1970-ies is considered. The conclusion concerning the existence of lines of scientific continuity, which caused a long coexistence of several mutually exclusive cultural-chronological schemes, is drawn. Keywords: historiography, neolithic, eneolithic, early metal, Upper Priobye | 1560 | ||||
| 2 | The article is devoted to the problem-chronological analysis of the historiography of the Neolithic and early metal of the Upper Ob basin in the 1950–1970-ies. The substantial characteristic of the initial stages of the scientific comprehension of the cultural-chronological specificity of these historical periods was offered. The first stage (the first half of the 1950-ies) is associated with the works of M. N. Komarova, V. N. Chernetsova, N. A. Chernysheva, M. P. Gryaznova. The second stage (the second half of the 1950-ies – the beginning of the 1970-ies) is represented by the works by V. I. Matushenko, M. F. Kosarev, M. V. Anikovich. The genesis of unique epistemological situation, expressed in the simultaneous occurrence and the parallel development of the two mutually exclusive culturalchronological concepts, is revealed. The conclusion is made about the key role of the identified situation, as the methodological premise of the following steps of scientific understanding of the problem. Keywords: historiography, neolithic, eneolithic, early metal, Upper Ob | 1917 | ||||