Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 24.02.2026
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

#SearchDownloads
1

. // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 1999. Issue 4 (13). P. 49-52

.

1530
2

Fragments of the Mental Culture of the Selkup People through Nomination of Mythic Characters. // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2006. Issue 4 (55). P. 133-140

The paper suggests an etymological analysis of the proper names of heroes – characters of “heroes’ songs”, and mythological and folklore images. As it was found out the nominative units origin from stems meaning “magic, sorcery”, “witchcraft”, “fortunetelling”. The names, in their turn, form a semantic base for verbs meaning “beat”, “knock, whack”, “crush”, “twist, screw”, “roll”, i.e. – verbs denoting heavy physical impact onto the subject. The harder the applied effort is, the more malicious is the mythic character. The analysis of names of mythic ancestors, good and wicked spirits, sorcerers, magicians and wizards showed that they are widely represented in the system of nomination and in the system of word building of the Selkup language.

1546
3

The Origin of the Numeral «One» and its Functioning in the Khanty Language Dialects // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2006. Issue 9 (60). P. 52-56

The article deals with the problem of the numeral «one» and its functioning in the Khanty language dialects. The Khanty numeral «one» (western ij /eastern Щj) could have been formed out of Finno-Ugrian stem *ike, *ьke and originally meant «unity». The differences in the sound shape of the numeral «one» in the Khanty language are determined, on the one hand, by dialectal phonetic varieties, and on the other – by its functional peculiarities, i.e. whether it performs attributive or non-attributive functions.

1892
4

The Structure of the Semantic Field ‘Intelligence’ in the Selkup Language // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2007. Issue 4 (67). P. 76-81

The article is devoted to the concept of intelligence in the linguistic space of the Selkup language within the linguistic theory of field. The structure of the field includes the nuclear, the close periphery, the periphery and the far periphery. The criterion of elements’ selection into the field is the general differentiating semantic indication. The position of this one in the structure of word’s meaning defines the place of the element in the field. The fields have no clear lines and cross each other in different flats.

1563
5

The Idea of the Origin/Birth of Man in a Language Picture of the Selkup World // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2007. Issue 4 (67). P. 88-97

Some events occurred during different stages of the development of Selkup ethnos are viewed in the article. The dichotomy up//down is on the basis of the global image of the world. Etymological analysis of the components of the coordinating compound words affords to reconstruct the initial meaning of the ethnicon. Analysis data showed that the dual structure of the ethnos finds its expression in the language on the deepest level - on the semantic level. Within every area dialect there are ‘the upper’ and ‘the lower’ Selkups.

1757
6

EUPHEMISATION AS A MEANS OF CREATION OF THE SELKUP LANGUAGE SEMANTIC SYSTEM // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2010. Issue 7 (97). P. 77-83

In the article the regularity of semantic derivations and origin of such category of words as adjectives, negative particles, pronouns, and postpositions in Selkup are given. The research is based on the names of mythic ancestors worshiped by the members of the Selkup nation. Morphemic division of the lexemes let define their possible initial meaning. The fact that the names of mythic ancestors are tabooed led to the process of euphemisation.

Keywords: the Selkup language, genonymum, euphemism, taboo, semantics, symbolism

1624
7

MYTHIC ANCESTORS IN SELKUP CULTURE (LINGUISTIC STUDY) // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2011. Issue 3 (105). P. 133-139

In the article the linguistic analysis of the factual material, connected with the cult of mythic ancestors, i.e. gods, spirits, is presented. Reconstruction of the fragments of mythic worldview shows the way of formation of the Selkup world perception and its reflection in the language. The inner organization of the ethnos is based on cult objects. Tribal self-designations are connected with them.

Keywords: mythic ancestor, intellectual culture, worldview, word morphemic structure

1681
8

WAYS OF FORMATION OF SELKUP GENONYMUMS AND THEIR REFLEXES IN THE LEXICO-SEMANTIC SYSTEM OF THE LANGUAGE // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2011. Issue 9 (111). P. 118-123

In the article the connection of names of Selkup kins with names of mythical ancestors is presented. It is found out that a name of a mythical ancestor becomes a centre of a semantic group of words to the extent of which semantic derivations occur. The connection of a kin with its mythical ancestor is kept; by means of the name of a kin it is given to a representative of a flora or fauna and continues its existence as a totem.

Keywords: the Selkup language, genonymum, mythical ancestor, semantic derivation, tatoo.

1425
9

THE FORMATION OF THE PRONOMINAL SYSTEM IN THE SELKUP LANGUAGE // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2012. Issue 10 (125). P. 65-69

In the article the rendering of the possible way of pronominal system formation in the Selkup language is offered. Interrogative pronouns were historically the names of mythical ancestors. Tabooing of the names caused the use of allegories in form of interrogative, indefi nite, negative pronouns. The substitutes of the names became the key elements of word formation: kaj “duck” (totem); kaj “who”, “what”, “what”; kajdo “why”, “what for”; kajne “nothing”.

Keywords: Selkup language, pronoun, euphemism, spiritual culture

1454
10

SOMATIC VOCABULARY CONTAINING SAJ ~ §AJ (‘AN EYE’) COMPONENT IN SELKUP // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2012. Issue 10 (125). P. 89-93

The article is devoted to the cultural and linguistic analysis of Selkup somatic vocabulary which consists of the words denoting eye parts (a pupil, an eyeball) or face parts connected with an eye (an eyelid, an eyebrow, an eyelash), and denomination of somatic word tear. The vocabulary under consideration includes general, for the given number of lexemes, components: saj ~ Зaj ‘an eye’.

Keywords: Selkup language, somatic vocabulary, an organ of visual perception, cultural realia

1435
11

SOME TENDENCIES OF SELKUP VOCABULARY FORMATION // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 3 (131). P. 62-67

In the article some ways of semantic derivations due to which Selkup basic vocabulary formed and developed are presented. Abstract notions replace concrete symbols specific for mythological thinking. The period of grammaticalization of concrete meanings ended in change of content words into connective and substitutive ones.

Keywords: Selkup, dialect, semantic derivation, regular sound correspondences

1542
12

DENOMINATIONS OF BODY IN THE SELKUP DIALECTS // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 10 (138). P. 109-113

In the article denominations of body in the Selkup dialects are investigated. The somatic words under study are systematized, their possible historic denominations are offered. The somatic vocabulary developed from denomination of body is analysed.

Keywords: Selkup, dialect, somatic vocabulary, denominations of body

1535
13

ORIGIN OF REPRESENTATION MEANS OF NEGATIVE CATEGORY IN THE SELKUP LANGUAGE // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2014. Issue 4 (145). P. 61-66

The article outlines ancient word semantics as a part of morphemic structure of negative pronouns and negative particles. Negative pronouns were formed on the base of interrogative pronouns and depended on general negative sentence semantics. Names of unreal world objects served as a source of origin for negative particles.

Keywords: the Selkup language, dialect, semantics, historical word formation, negative pronoun, negative particle

1479

2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU