Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 15.12.2025
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

#SearchDownloads
1

IS THERE THE FORMAL-SEMANTIC WORD VARIATION? // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2011. Issue 9 (111). P. 57-60

The article is devoted to one of the most important fields of Russian linguistics – variantology. The author describes the lexical units identification rules as the variants of the word using the basic states given by the founders of the word identity and difference theory. The author is developing the idea of existence of the formal semantic type of word variation.

Keywords: the variation of words, the type of variants of words

1388
2

THE MAIN FEATURES OF THE CONCEPT “HOUSE” REPRESENTATED IN THE DISCOURSE OF INDIVIDUAL – A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE RUSSIAN GERMANS IN SIBERIA // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2011. Issue 9 (111). P. 79-82

This article is devoted to description of one of the key concepts in the German folk linguistic culture – the concept “house”. The investigation results of the individual’s oral discourse – the representative of the Russian Germans of Tomsk region are expounded. Lexical objectification of the main features within the mentioned concept is detected.

Keywords: dialect linguistic personality, German dialect, linguistic culture, concept and its features

1459
3

LEXICAL OBJECTIFICATION OF THE CONCEPT OF “THE PAST’’ ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE KET LANGUAGE // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2011. Issue 9 (111). P. 163-167

This article explores the objectification of one of the structural components of the concept of “time” by the lexical means of the Ket language.

Keywords: concept “time’’, past, spatial mataphor, seriously endangered languages, the Ket language

1443
4

THE FEATURES OF THE CONCEPT “FAMILY” REPRESENTATED IN THE DIALECT DISCOURSE OF THE RUSSIAN GERMANS IN TOMSK REGION // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2012. Issue 10 (125). P. 48-52

The article is written in the context of linguistic and cultural studies and the German “island” dialectology. It focuses on identifying features of the concept “family”, which are objectifi ed in the folk discourse of the Russian Germans.

Keywords: linguistic culture, german dialect, concept and its features

1492
5

SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS OF WORD FORMAL VARIATION WITHIN SOCIOLECT AND IDIOLECT OF MODERN RUSSIAN SPEECH // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2012. Issue 10 (125). P. 141-144

The article is dedicated to one of the most dynamic phenomenon in the modern Russian folk dialects – formal variation of the word. Comparison results of the material wordshell modifi cation features in individual and usual language of Siberian accent carriers are given herein.

Keywords: old Siberian residents speech, individual and collective lexicon, word formal variation

1484
6

THE REPRESENTATION OF THE MAIN FEATURES OF THE CONCEPT “DORF” IN THE DISCOURSE OF RUSSIAN GERMANS OF TOMSK REGION // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 10 (138). P. 71-76

This article is devoted to the description of the significant concept in the German folk linguistic culture: the concept “Dorf”. It contains the investigation results in the field research of the actual oral discourse of the Russian Germans who live in Tomsk region: the generalization of the lexical objectification of the main features of the mentioned concept.

Keywords: derived German dialect, concept and its features

1369
7

HISTORICAL ETYMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE NAME CONCEPT “FAMILIE” // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 10 (138). P. 80-83

The article investigates the concept of the word-name “Familie” in a diachronic perspective. On the basis of German etymological dictionaries the origin and the semantic development of the word is analysed.

Keywords: German language, concept, key word etymology, semantic change

1355
8

DEFINITIONAL ANALYSIS OF LEXICOGRAPHICAL INTERPRETATIONS OF THE NAME CONCEPT “FAMILY” // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2016. Issue 7 (172). P. 65-69

The article is devoted to one of the key derivations of Russian culture of language – concept “Family”. It provides a complete and coherent analysis of dictionary definitions of the name of this concept. Published in XIX–XXI dictionaries of Russian language are served as a source of practical material. Material of dictionaries allowed to reconsrtuct the usual model of the name of concept “Family”. The article also describes the first observations about the specificity of Russian concept in the background of correlative concepts. The article concluded that the word “family”, having unbranched semantic structure has undergone semantic changes and gradually became a polysemant. Over time it has developed the metaphorical and metonymic meanings. As a term the word came into use in the natural and language sciences.

Keywords: lexicographical explanation of representative of concept, analysis of definitions of the word “Family” in semantic terms

1487
9

ANTHROPONYMS OF RUSSIAN GERMANS IN TOMSK REGION ACCORDING TO SURVEY // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2018. Issue 4 (193). P. 59-64

The paper refers to the sphere of German studies, which is devoted to the language and culture of Russian Germans. The paper deals with anthroponymics – an understudied part of lexicon of the popular-spoken language of this ethnic community. The relevance of research topic is dictated by 1) urgent tasks of fixing, preserving and studying language and culture of Russian Germans as minority entities; 2) need to understand the linguo-cultural problems related to ethnoses and ethnic groups, with the use of still unused empirical materials, as well as testimony of metalanguage consciousness; 3) need for a detailed study of the nominal system of Russian Germans. The work was written due to the results of a fulltime audience survey of Russian Germans now living in Tomsk. It analyzes the names and demonstrations of metalanguage consciousness of representatives of this diasporic group. The names and demonstrations are represented in relation to proper names, which have German “color”. The aim of the paper is to determine whether Russian Germans’ proper names preserve the ethno-cultural connotation. The work results have both linguistic and historical-cultural significance. The combination of different ways of studying proper nouns of Russian Germans – revealing the procedural linguistic knowledge of subjects and referring to their declarative knowledge of German language allows to recreate links of anthroponymic system of this ethnic community. New lexical units,which clarify the notion of peculiarities of marks of Russian Germans are introduced into scientific usage. They can be used to compile anthroponymic dictionaries, a database of dying cultures.

Keywords: sociolinguistic questioning, linguo-culture of Russian Germans, modern anthroponyms

1368
10

SIGNS OF CONCEPT “STUDENT” REPRESENTED IN RUSSIAN NATIONAL CORPUS // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2019. Issue 9 (206). P. 72-77

Introduction. The concept “student” is common to different linguistic cultures of a civilized society and relates to the academic sphere of human activity. This work is devoted to the study of actualized and hidden features – structurally-meaningful components – of the concept “student”. Material and methods. The object of the study is the fragments of Russian National Corpus (RNC). In this paper, we study minimal contexts, usually equal to the sentence and detailed contexts, usually coinciding with the paragraph, as well as the headings of texts reflecting 1900–1917. The relevance of this work is determined by the social significance of the student’s figure in developed human communities and the lack of knowledge on RNC material of the concept related to it. The study examines the most typical uses of the word in multi-style (literary and non-literary) and multi-genre texts of RNC. The methods of the descriptive method (observation, classification, interpretation, generalization, arithmetic calculations) and the methods of linguo-conceptual analysis (contextual and semantic analysis, the analysis of the concept name, correlation of the concept name with historical and cultural data, modeling the structure of the concept, corpus linguistics techniques) are used in the work. Results and discussion. The categorical (qualitative, event-time, spatial) and non-categorical (biological, anthropomorphic) signs of the name of concept “student” are revealed. The taxonomic and nuclear-peripheral models of the studied concept are proposed. During the construction of the first model, the connection between concept “student” and super-concepts “human”, “education/to study” (“to learn”), “higher educational institution is determined”. In the nuclear-peripheral model of this concept, being characterized for the beginning of the last century, the main complex (compound) semes are ‘young man’, ‘studying for a certain time at a university or institute’, ‘engaged mainly in educational activities to obtain one or another profession’. The socio-political and individual characteristics are presumably found in the interpretational field of the considered concept. It was also established that there is no connotation in the lexical semantics of the name of concept “student”. All self-evaluative features of this word are contextually determined. Conclusion. This work is intended for researchers in the field of lexical semantics, linguo-culturology and for students of linguistic conceptual analysis techniques.

Keywords: concept name “student”, its semantic attributes, contexts of Russian National Corpus

1250

2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU