Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 08.04.2026
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

#SearchDownloads
1

IMAGES OF CHARACTERS OF THE FAIRY-TALE POEM “THE MAIDEN TSAR” (“TSAR’-DEVITSA”) BY M. I. TSVETAEVA IN THE MIRROR OF COMPARISONS: THE MAIDEN TSAR AND TSAREVITCH // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2019. Issue 4 (201). P. 31-40

The article examines the semantic and stylistic system of comparisons in the fairy-tale poem “The Maiden Tsar” by M. I. Tsvetaeva. The purpose of the article is to compare features of the source domain and the target domain corre sponding to the comparisons in the fairy-tale poem of M. Tsvetaeva with the features of the images of The Maiden Tsar and Tsarevitch. The cognitive theory of the metaphorical speech and the theory of the literary word associativity developed in the communicative stylistics of text are the basis of the analysis of comparisons. In relation to comparisons, target domain (A) is a compared object, its semantic features, while source domain (B) is an object, with which A is compared. In the consciousness of an addresser, source domain is a reaction to the target domain, while, in the consciousness of an addressee, it is an incentive to form the associative field of the target domain. As one of the most important characteristics of the literary word, associativity allows the addresser and the addressee to compare two domains (A and B) on a definite basis (C), which becomes a key to the aesthetic sense. The analysis includes semantic and stylistic, statistic and stylistic methods. The system of comparisons reflects the important characteristics of the key images of the poem. It concerns not only means of expression of the comparison (for example, Ablative of Comparison expressing brightness, sharpness, and dynamism plays a great role in the representation of The Maiden Tsar, while conjunctions of comparison with unreal modality expressing that the character is lost and incompatible with material world are significant in the realization of the image of Tsarevitch), but also the comparison of the target domain and source domain. The following conclusions are the result of the research: in the comparison of the target domain of comparisons representing The Maiden Tsar and Tsarevitch, the integral semantic feature is the unusualness of characters belonging to another world. However, they have different nature of this belonging: The Maiden Tsar has the solar one (semantics of life, energy, warmth), while Tsarevitch has the lunar one (semantics of unreality, physical weakness, cold). Comparison of the other semantic characteristics of the target domain (a type of beauty and strength) occurs according to this central opposition. The differentiation of images according to the characteristics of the target domain includes the difference of such semantic dominants as the strength of love (in the image of The Maiden Tsar) and creativity (in the image of Tsarevitch). Source domain reflects the associative richness of the poetic world of M. Tsvetaeva. Aesthetic content of the comparisons of M. Tsvetaeva is endless. However, the analysis of comparisons based on the approaches of communicative stylistics of text and cognitive linguistics makes it possible to describe comparisons as the semantic and stylistic system.

Keywords: idiostyle of M. Tsvetaeva, fairy-tale poem “The Maiden Tsar”, comparison, source domain, target domain

2248

2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU