Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 20.06.2026
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

#SearchDownloads
1

Features of the writer Tatiana Meiko`s communicative style in an interview // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2025. Issue 1 (237). P. 63-70

The study of the media discourse of public linguistic personalities belongs to the relevant areas of modern linguistics. Of particular interest is the analysis of interviews with the participation of the writer as a creative personality with a special worldview and the ability to focus on the mass addressee. The purpose of the article is to identify the specifics of the communicative style of the creative media linguistic personality of the writer based on his speech behavior in interviews. The article analyzes the material of 4 interviews in 2013-2023 with the participation of Tatyana Efremovna Meiko, a member of the Union of Writers of Russia. The research was carried out in line with communicative stylistics using the theory of regularity developed within the framework of this direction and using methods of discursive analysis, semantic-stylistic, contextual analysis and experiment based on a survey of informants. It is established that in the interview T. Meiko reveals herself as a creative, emotional, passionate person, constantly on the lookout, able to support young writers by sharing his experience. In interviews, the author often uses communicative strategies of influence, self-presentation, positive attitude, openness, and trust. This is reflected in the verbal and non-verbal behavior of the individual, including phonation features, gestures and facial expressions. It is revealed that the writer in public media communication is characterized by a figurative metaphorical style, which manifests itself in the use of vivid regulatory means (metaphors, epithets, comparisons), as well as stylistic techniques of repetition, contrast, rhetorical questions and exclamations. Of the regulatory strategies in the writer’s discourse, strong explicit regulatory strategies of a mixed sequential-convergent type prevail in terms of uniformity / heterogeneity of the regulatory tools used, performing one function. The experiment on the recognition of the writer and his perception as a person and participant in the interview showed that most of the participants in the experiment know Tatiana Meiko and assess her as a creative person, open to positive communication, capable of emotionally influencing the recipient. The theory of regularity makes it possible to reveal the individual author’s peculiarities of the communicative style of the writer’s public linguistic personality, to identify communication strategies characteristic of it, as well as various means and methods of effective influence on the addressee.

Keywords: communicative style, public linguistic personality, interview, theory of regularity

980
2

Features of Anna Matveeva’s communicative style in the Telegram channel // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2025. Issue 4 (240). P. 78-85

The features of the communicative style of a linguistic personality are studied within the framework of media linguistics, linguopersonology, stylistics, and the theory of speech communication. According to the concept developed in the communicative stylistics of the text, this style is expressed in the communicative manifestation of the personality in various communication situations at the level of typical communicative roles, tactics and strategies, the choice of regulatory means and structures, attitudes towards communicative norms, orientation towards the addressee, preferences in the choice of speech genres. The purpose of the article is to identify the specifics of the communicative style of the writer’s creative media linguistic personality based on his speech behavior in the Telegram channel. The research material was the Telegram channel of the Russian writer Anna Matveeva (posts for 2024-2025). The study was carried out in line with communicative stylistics using the methods of discourse analysis, semantic-stylistic and contextual analysis. Anna Matveeva's linguistic personality is revealed in her personal Telegram channel as creative, emotional, passionate, open communicator. Various communication strategies are used in her blogs: self-presentation, creating a positive mood, understanding experience, informing, expert assessment. Various regulatory means and structures reveal the author’s image and create the impression of the writer as a bright public figure with a rich information thesaurus and an original worldview. The regulatory means that predominate are epithets, metaphors, irony, and hyperbole. The high-usage regulatory structures are the following: repetition, amplification, gradation, antithesis, stringing of rhetorical questions. Anna Matveeva acts in different communicative roles (as a blogger, writer, expert analyst). The author's tone of communication is confidential. The predominant type of speech is reasoning with elements of description. The involvement of subscribers in the life of the community can be assessed by the communicative effect on the addressee. Subscribers to the writer's Telegram channel are engaged in the active discussion, judging by their comments and assessments. Anna Matveeva presents herself as a bearer of elite speech culture, with a sense of humor, capable of objectively perceiving the world around her. Anna Matveeva's communicative style in the Telegram channel reflects her characteristics as a writer who creatively describes current events with the figurative perception of the surrounding world inherent to this type of linguistic personality. The results of the study are of interest for further analysis of the features of media communication of a writer as a linguistic personality and can be useful for media linguistics, linguopersonology, and stylistics.

Keywords: communicative stylistics, media text, communicative style, blog, Anna Matveeva

766
3

The Communicative style of the writer’s linguistic personality in the media (based on the discourse of D. Dragunsky, A. Matveeva, and T. Meyko) // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2026. Issue 3 (245). P. 81-89

The aim of the research is to identify and describe the specifics of reflecting a writer’s public linguistic persona idiolect in media communication, and to define models of communicative style variation across different media genres. The research is conducted within the framework of communicative text stylistics. The theoretical basis is A. V. Bolotnova’s model of idiolect, which includes cultural-speech, communicative, and cognitive substyles. The research material comprises discursive practices of three contemporary Russian writers: interviews and author blogs by Denis Dragunsky; interviews and the Telegram channel of Anna Matveeva; interviews by Tatyana Meyko. The study employed methods of discursive, semantic-stylistic, contextual, and comparative analysis. Based on the discursive practices of the three writers, it is proven that the idiolect of these linguistic personas in media represents a dynamic system with a stable cognitive-value core and variable communicative implementations. Three distinct models of writers’ media presentation are identified and described, demonstrating the dialectic of unity and variation in idiolect: 1) the synthesis model, characteristic of D. Dragunsky, based on blurring the boundaries between the author’s persona and a literary character through a strategy combining intellectual depth of content with confidential irony; 2) the genre code model, typical for A. Matveeva, characterized by a clear differentiation of communicative strategies – ironic self-reflection in the blog and expert analysis in interviews – while maintaining an elite speech culture across these media genres; 3) the direct transmission model, characteristic of T. Meyko, with a dominant artistic metaphorical style manifesting in media communication and serving to enhance the effect of the author’s authenticity and value orientation. Applying the comprehensive idiolect model to analyze writers’ media communication allows for identifying common and individual features in their discursive practices. It is established that successful media communication by a writer is built on varying degrees of adaptation of their individual cognitive and cultural-speech features across different media genres. The stability of a writer’s linguistic persona deep-seated attitudes, combined with flexible use of communicative tactics and strategies, is key to creating a recognizable and effective public image in the digital environment. The research results are of interest for the further development of communicative stylistics and media linguistics.

Keywords: communicative stylistics of the text, idiostyle, media discourse, сommunicative style, Denis Dragunsky, Anna Matveeva, Tatyana Meyko

162

2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU