Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 05.01.2026
Home Issues 2009 Year Issue №3 EFFECT OF pH ON THE RELEASE OF ORGANIC MATTER FROM MUCKS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

EFFECT OF pH ON THE RELEASE OF ORGANIC MATTER FROM MUCKS

Sokolovska S., Shaydak L., Varshulska P.

Information About Author:

The effect of high pH values on the release of organic matter (OM) from mucks was investigated. This study was conducted on homoionic hydrogen forms of 7 mucks (Terric Histosols). Concentration of dissolved organic matter (DOM) released were determined colorimetrically at l=465 nm. Parameters Q2/6 and Q4/6 were calculated from spectra in visible region. The dissolution of soil OM was significantly affected by pH. The relationship could be satisfactorily described by the equation: DOM = 0.01Чexp(b1ЧpH). The b1 parameter quantified the DOM release process in relation to the changes in soil pH. The investigations proved correlations among W1, Q and b1 indexes.

Keywords: dissolved organic matter (DOM), mucks, pH, state of secondary transformation

References:

1. Naucke W. // Characterization of peats by their components and the reliability of the determination of individual components. In: Moor- und Torfkunde. K. Gхttlib E. Schweizerbert’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, West Germany. 1980. pp.185–91 (in German)

2. Kalbitz K., Geyer W., Geyer S. // Spectroscopic properties of dissolved humic substances - a reflection of land use history in a fen area. Biogeochemistry. 1999. № 47, p. 219–238.

3. Okruszko H. // The principles of identyfications and division of hydrogenic soils from point of view of amelioration purposes (in Polish), Bibl. Wiad. IMUZ. 1976. № 52, p. 7–54.

4. Kalbitz K., Solinger S., Park J.H., Michalzik B., Matzner E. // Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in soils: a review, Soil Sci. 2000. № 165, p. 277–287.

5. Gawlik J. // Water holding capacity of peat formations as an index of the state of their secondary transformation, Pol. J. Soil Sci. 1992. № 2, p. 121–129.

6. Szajdak L. // Chemical properties of peat. In: Ilnicki P (ed.) Peat and Peatlands. Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej im. A. Cieszkowskiego, Poznaс. 2002. p. 432–450 (in Polish)

7. Leinweber P., Schulten H-R., Kalbitz K., Meissen R., Jancke H. // Fulvic acid composition in degraded fenlands. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2001. № 164, p. 371–379.

8. Baes A.U., Bloom P.R. // Fulvic Acid UV-VIS Spectra: Influence of Solvent and pH, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1990. № 54, p. 1248–1255.

9. Kononowa M.M. // Soil Organic Matter, Pergamon, Elmsford, N.Y. 1966.

10. Ghosh K., Schnitzer M. // UV and visible absorption spectroscopic investigations in relation to macromolecular characteristics in humic substances, J. Soil Sci. 1979. № 30, p. 735–743.

11. Tipping E., Woof C. // Humic substances in acid organic soils: modelling their release to the soil solution in terms of humic charge, J. Soil Science. 1990. № 41, p. 573–581.

12. Matyka-Sarzyсska D., Sokoіowska Z. // Empirical equation to describe the effect of pH on organic matter release from mucks, Intern. Agrophysics. 2005. № 19, p. 323–328.

Sokolovska_S._..,_SHajdak_L._..,_Varshul-ska_P._.._105_109_3_81_2009.pdf ( 1.22 MB ) Sokolovska_S._..,_SHajdak_L._..,_Varshul-ska_P._.._105_109_3_81_2009.zip ( 787.45 kB )

Issue: 3, 2009

Rubric: Physical, Chemical and Biological Properties of Bog Formation

Pages: 105 — 109

Downloads: 1501

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU