Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 16.02.2026
Home Issues 2009 Year Issue №3 CHARACTERISTIC OF GROUP COMPOSITION OF REPRESENTATIVE WESTERN SIBERIAN TAIGA ZONE PEATS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

CHARACTERISTIC OF GROUP COMPOSITION OF REPRESENTATIVE WESTERN SIBERIAN TAIGA ZONE PEATS

Shinkeyeva N.A., Maslov S.G., Arkhipov V.S.

Information About Author:

It was studied a group composition of the organic matter from representative peats of the Western Siberian taiga zone. For its characteristic were selected 6 types of peat. The group composition was defined using the Instorf’s technique. It was found out that the Western Siberian peats have a difference from the European peats in the content of water-soluble and light-hydrolyzing substances and humic substances.

Keywords: peat, group composition, organic matter, peat deposit, types of peat, bitumen, humic acids, water-soluble and light- hydrolyzing substance

References:

1. Lebedev K.К., Regularities of chemical composition of the low-land peats // Peat industry . 1967. N 2. p. 34–37.

2. Stadnikov G.L.Chemistry of peat. М.: Goshimizdat, 1932. 177 p.

3. Rakovskii B.E.General chemical technology of peat. М.: Gosenergoizdat, 1949. 363 p.

4. Turemnov C. N. Peat deposits.Issue 3. М.: Nature, 1976. 488 p.

5. Rakovskii B.E.,Pigulevskaya L.B. Chemistry and genesis of peat . М., «Subsoil», 1978. 231 p.

6. Korol N.T.Most widespread kind of peat in the European part of the Russian federation , its technical characteristic and possible direccion of utilization // Proceeding of the institution Giprotorfrazvedka. М., 1969, Issue.1. p. 3–98.

7. Lishtvan I.I.,Kruglinskii O.C.Possibilities of peat as raw materials // Peat industry. 1991. N 4. p. 15–23.

8. Bambalov N.N.,BelenkayaT.Y. Fractional group composition of organic substance into the virgin and improved peat soil //Soil science. 1998. N 12.p. 1431–1437.

9. Lishtvan I.I. Peat in the biotechnology. М.: Science and technology, 1987. 151 p

10. Peat sample catalog of the Geoltorfrazvedka trust’s collecion. М., 1971.

11. Lishtvan I.I., Korol N.T. Basic peat features and the metods of its determination. Мн.: Science and technology , 1975. 320 p.

12. Lishtvan I.I., Terentiev A.A., Basin E.T., Golovach A.A. Physical-chemical foundations of peat production technology. М.: Science and technology, 1983. 232 p.

13. Peat deposits of the West siberia. М., 1957. 149 p.

14. Inisheva L.I., Agronomic nature of peat // Chemistry of vegetable raw materials. 1988. N4. p. 17–22.

15.Inisheva L.I., Dementieva T.V. Organic substance of peat and its biochemical stability asessment // Agrochemistry. 2001. N3. p. 25–34.

16. Savicheva O.G., Inisheva L.I.,Biological activity of the peat bogs // Siberian ecological magazine. 2000. N5. p. 607–613.

17. Dementieva T.V., Inisheva L.I. Intensity of transformation process into the peats of differnt botanical compositon // Siberian herald . Agricultural sciences. 1998. N 3. p. 18–23.

18. Inisheva L.I., Dementieva T.V. Fractional composition of organic substance into the low-land peat. Peat in the agriculture.Tomsk. 1997. p. 40–49.

19.Archipov В.S., Maslov S.G., Shinkeeva N.A. Peat of the Tomsk region as raw materials in the fertilizer produccion //Material of the Russian scientific production conference. Krasnoyarsk. 2001. p. 94–99.

20. Archipov В.S., Maslov S.G., Composition and features of typical peat sorts in the Central part of the West Siberia // Chemistry of vegetable raw materials. 1998. N4. p. 9–16.

21. Inisheva L.I., Archipov В.S., Mihantieva L.S. Peat resoursesof the Tomsk region and its utilization. Novosibirsk, 1995. 88 p.

22. Archipov В.S., Preis U.P., Bertanotis B.K., Maslov S.G.,Antropova H.G. Bituminous peats of the Tomsk region.Tomsk: STT, 2008. 240 p.

23. Grejova I.V. Qualitative characteristics of the low-land peats of Tumen region // Material of the Russian scientific production conference. Krasnoyarsk. 2001. p. 82–83.

24. Maslov S.G., Inisheva L.I. Peat as vegetable raw materials and the direccion of its chemical processing // Chemistry of vegetable raw materials. 1998. N 4. p. 5–7.

25. Liss O.L., Abramova L.I. etc. Bog sistem of the West Siberia and its nature conservation significance. Moscow 2001. 584 p.

26. Belkevich I.P., Golovanov N.G.,Dolidovich E.F Bitumen of peat and brown coal. Minsk.: Science and technology , 1989. 127 p.

SHinkeeva_N._A.,_Maslov_S._G.,_Arhipov_V._S._116_119_3_81_2009.pdf ( 2.21 MB ) SHinkeeva_N._A.,_Maslov_S._G.,_Arhipov_V._S._116_119_3_81_2009.zip ( 1.91 MB )

Issue: 3, 2009

Rubric: Physical, Chemical and Biological Properties of Bog Formation

Pages: 116 — 119

Downloads: 1737

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU