Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 31.03.2026
Home Issues 2000 Year Issue №3 . Drug business of Colombia at the end of XX century.
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

. Drug business of Colombia at the end of XX century.

Ruvinskiy V.V.

Information About Author:

The paper tells about socio-economic conditions of drug business in Colombia in the last decades of XX cen¬tury. Main constituents of Colombian drug symbiosis are analyzed. The activity of cartels, the pressure of economy on criminality and political failure in organizing struggle against drug traffic are considered as well.

References:

1. Alvarez E.H. The political economy of coca production In Bolivia, Colombia and Peru: Economic importance and political implications. Center

for Policy Research, University of Albany Press, 1993.

2. Andelman D.A. The Drug Money Maze // Foreign Affairs. July-August Issue, 1994. P. 95-108.

3. Avila Jesus Antonio (Director de investigation). Colombia: Inseguridad, Violencia у Desempeno Economico en las Areas Rurales. Bogota:

Universidad Externado de Colombia, 1997.

4. Cardenas M., Garay L.J. Macroeconomia de los flujos de capital en Colombia у America Latina. Editores Tercer Mundo S.A. Bogota, 1994.

5. Castillo F. Los nuevos jinetes de la cocaine. Bogota: Editorial Oveja Negra, 1996.

6. De Franco M.,-Godoy R. The Economic Consequences of Cocaine Production in Bolivia: Historical, Local and Macroeconomic Perspectives //

Journal of Latin American Studies. 1992. Vol. 24. P. 375-406.

7. Fischer T. Colombia: The Narco-Perspective // Swiss Review of World Affairs. 1995. Vol. 4. P. 14-16.

8. Hammer J., Ambrus S. From Bad to Worse // Newsweek. 1997, October 20. P.14-18,

9. Gomez H.J. El tamafio del narcotrafico у su impacto economico // Economia Colombiana. Vol. 226-227.1990.

10. Mora A., Pena'M. Historia Socioeconomica de Colombia. Bogota: Grupo Editorial Norma, 1997.

11. Panesso R.J, Colombia, Proyectos e Investigaciones Turisticas. Bogota: Grupo Editorial Norma, 1996.

12. Schrieberg D., Padgett T, Up in Arms // Newsweek. 1996. September 16. P, 34-37.

13. Steiner R, Los dolaras del narcotrafico. Bogota: Editores Tercer Mundo S.A., 1997.

14. Thoumi.F. Economia polltica у narcotrafico, TM Editores, Bogota, 1993.

15. Illegal Drugs in Latin'America: Implications for Economic Development // The World Bank. Washington: D.C, 1995.

16. Zabludoff S. Colombian Narcotics Organizations as Business Enterprises. Washington: D.C., 1994.

ruvinskij_v._v._52_56_3_19_2000.pdf ( 1.02 MB ) ruvinskij_v._v._52_56_3_19_2000.zip ( 1003.5 kB )

Issue: 3, 2000

Series of issue: Humanities (Special Issue)

Rubric: Economics and Political Science

Pages: 52 — 56

Downloads: 1698

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU