Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 07.04.2026
Home Issues 2014 Year Issue №1 BIOETHICS AS A PROGRAM OF PRACTICE ORIENTED HUMANISM
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

BIOETHICS AS A PROGRAM OF PRACTICE ORIENTED HUMANISM

Fikhtner E.N.

Information About Author:

The paper shows that the formation of bioethical culture, the emergence of bioethics, its evolution from practice to theory can be viewed as a mechanism for the implementation of the principle of humanistic paradigm of expertise in the practice-oriented humanism.

Keywords: bioethics, bioethical culture, practice-oriented humanism, humanist examination

References:

1. Heidegger M. Letter on Humanism / Being and Time. Moscow, Respublika Publ. 1993, pp. 255–317 (in Russian).

2. Lamont C. The philosophy of humanism. URL: http://humanism.al.ru/ru/articles.phtml?num=0001

3. Kokarevich M. N. Essentialism as a philosophical methodology reconstruction of cultural-historical reality. Tomsk: TSABU Publ., 2004. 272 р. (in Russian).

4. Hegel.G. Philosophy of history. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1975. 446 p. (in Russian).

5. Spengler O. The Decline of Europe. Works in 2 volmes. Vol.1. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993. 444 p. (in Russian).

6. Herder I. G. Ideas to the philosophy of history of humanity. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. 698 p. (in Russian).

7. Borisov E. V., Inish I. N., Furs V. N. Practical turn in postmetaphysical philosophy. Vilnius, European Humanities University Press Publ., 2008. 212 p. (in Russian).

8. Potter V. R. Bioethics – Bridge to the Future. Kiev, Derzhava Publ., 2002. 216 p. (in Russian).

9. Zhelobov A. I. Imperative of humanism in bioethics: a sociocultural and philosophical-anthropological aspects. St. Petersburg, 2008. 150 p. (in Russian).

10. Balevsky D. Black market trade in organs. The New York Times from 28.06. 2012. URL: http://inoforum.ru/inostrannaya_pressa/chyornyj_rynok_torgovli_

11. Sergeev A. S. Received “ethical” embryonic stem cells [electronic resource] / S. A. Sergeev // Electronic Encyclopedia “Nature of Science”. URL: http://elementy.ru/news/430176/

12. Stem cells – the elixir of youth [electronic resource] / Op. according to the site environmental assessment. URL: http://www.eco911.ru/public/healthlife/stvolovye-kletki-eliksir-molodos

13. Ten E. E. Basics of Social Medicine. Moscow, Forum–InfaM Publ., 2003. 228 p. (in Russian).

14. Yudin B. G. Make fairy tale come true? (Human engineering). Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2006, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 7–19. (in Russian).

15. Tishchenko P. Bio-power in the Epoch of Biotechnologies. Moscow, Institute of Philosophy RAS Publ., 2000, 177 p. (in Russian).

16. Apressyan R. The Dilemma of Anthropocentrism and Non-anthropocentrism in Environmental Ethics // Ethics and Ecology. Velikiy Novgorod, 2010, pp. 13–25. (in Russian).

17. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Diagnosis of memory-turn on bioethics measurement problems of vocational education. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2012, vol. 4, pp. 244–247. (in Russian).

18. Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Semiotic diagnostics: method of measuring the selfi shness of power. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, vol. 11, pp. 260–267. (in Russian).

19. Meshcheryakova T. V. Bioethics as a form of individuality protection in modern culture. Higher Education in Russia, 2009, no. 10, pp. 94–99. (in Russian).

20. Meshcheryakova T. V. Bioethics as intersection of scientifi c and extra-scientifi c areas. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2011, vol. 10, pp. 216–221. (in Russian).

fikhtner_e._n._156_160_1_142_2014.pdf ( 496.7 kB ) fikhtner_e._n._156_160_1_142_2014.zip ( 489.7 kB )

Issue: 1, 2014

Series of issue: Issue 1

Rubric: SCIENTIFIC MESSAGES

Pages: 156 — 160

Downloads: 1603

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU