Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 10.04.2026
Home Issues 2013 Year Issue №10 THE INFLUENCE OF RUSSIAN GRAMMATICAL TRADITION ON THE DESCRIPTION OF THE FINNO-UGRIC LANGUAGES
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE INFLUENCE OF RUSSIAN GRAMMATICAL TRADITION ON THE DESCRIPTION OF THE FINNO-UGRIC LANGUAGES

Mymrina D.F., Shitts O.A.

Information About Author:

The article deals the problem of the Russian language influence on the minority languages of the Russian Federation. The results of the influence could be seen in the Finno-Ugric grammar description, which is often performed following Russian grammatical tradition. The influence is also revealed in the process of Finno-Ugric textbook creating and the methods of material presenting.

Keywords: contact influence, Finno-Ugric, adjective, accusative, the future tense

References:

1. Languages of the World: Uralic Languages. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993. 398 p. (in Russian).

2. Knowledge of languages by the population of the Russian Federation. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/Documents/Vol4/pub-04-05.pdf (Access date: 26.03.2013). (in Russian).

3. Population by ethnic origin and knowledge of Russian. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/Documents/Vol4/pub-04-03-1.pdf (Access date: 26.03.2013). (in Russian).

4. Sunik O. P. The general theory of parts of speech. Second edition. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2010. 136 p. (in Russian).

5. Pozdeyeva A. A. Udmurt grammar. Part I: phonetics and morphology. Izhevsk, Udmurt State Publ., 1940. 126 p. (in Udmurt).

6. The Moksha language. Morphology. Saransk, 2000. 236 p. (in Moksha).

7. Schitz O. A. «Adjectives» in the Uralic languages: Evidence from Finnish, Hungarian, Udmurt, Komi and Mordvin. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2006, no 9 (60), pp. 67–70 (in Russian).

8. Volodin A. P. The absence of Accusative as a typologically dominant feature of the Uralic languages (evidence from the Finnish language). Proceedings of the international scientifi c conference of teachers and graduate students dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the chair of Finno-Ugric studies of Saint Petersburg State University. Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Publ., 2000, pp. 28-37. (in Russian).

9. Tsypanov E. A. The comparative overview of the Finno-Ugric languages. Syktyvkar, Kola Publ., 2008. 216 p. (in Russian).

10. Kondrat’eva N. V. The category of case in nouns in the Udmurt language. Izhevsk, Udmurt State University Publ., 2011. 255 p. (in Russian).

11. Mymrina D. F. The category of case in the dialects of the Khanty language (comparative analysis). Saarbrьcken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG, 2011. 158 p. (in Russian).

12. Balandin A. N. The Mansi textbook for self-learning. Leningrad, Uchpedgiz Publ., 1960. 248 p. (in Russian).

13. Deбk S. The textbook in the Hungarian language. Budapest, 1961, vol. 1, 312 p. (in Russian).

14. Pokacheva E. R., Pesikova A. S. Khanty-Russian phrase book (the Surgut dialect). Khanty-Mansiysk, Poligrafi st Publ., 2006. 124 p. (in Russian).

15. Kiekbayev J. G. The introduction to the Ural-Altaic linguistics. Ufa, 1972. 151 p. (in Russian).

16. Hajdu P. The Uralic languages and peoples (translation from Hungarian). Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985. 432 p. (in Russian).

17. Sengepov A. M., Nemysova E. A., Moldanova S. P., Voldina M. K., Lyskova N. A. The Khanty language: for the students of teacher training colleges. Leningrad, Prosveschenie Publ., 1988. 224 p. (in Russian).

18. Nikolaeva I. A. Ostyak. Mьnchen: Newcastle: LINCOM Europa, 1999. 106 p.

19. Yadobcheva-Dresvyanina V. Ya. The declension and conjugation in the Obdorsk dialect of the Khanty language. Abstract of thesis candidate of philology sci. Saint Petersburg, 2002. 22 p. (in Russian).

mymrina_d._f._103_108_10_138_2013.pdf ( 429.73 kB ) mymrina_d._f._103_108_10_138_2013.zip ( 422.02 kB )

Issue: 10, 2013

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: FINNO-UGRIC AND SAMOYED TURKIC LANGUAGES

Pages: 103 — 108

Downloads: 1573

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU