Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 20.02.2026
Home Issues 2013 Year Issue №10 THE SUBJECT OF COMPARISON AS A MEANS OF REPRESENTATION OF LINGUISTIC PERSONALITY IN A COLLECTION OF POEMS BY INNA LISNYANSKAYA “ECHO”
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE SUBJECT OF COMPARISON AS A MEANS OF REPRESENTATION OF LINGUISTIC PERSONALITY IN A COLLECTION OF POEMS BY INNA LISNYANSKAYA “ECHO”

Pankratova M.V.

Information About Author:

The article is devoted to the aspect of refraction of the author’s consciousness and linguistic identity, in particular poetic device. From a number of poetic images there were selected those which differ in the role of the construction of an individual world view of the poetess I. Lisnyanskiy, and clearly expressed the character of her poetic perception of the world, depicting the main features of her individual style. The article reveals the question about the functional role of the subject of comparison in developing individual concept field.

Keywords: linguistic identity, individual style, the subject of comparison, subjective beginning, the author’s representation, linguistic view of the world

References:

1. Ginzburg L. Ya. On lyrics. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 1997. 414 p. (in Russian).

2. Borisova V. M. The problem of author’s linguistic identity as the category of the literary text. Philological science, 2006, no. 5, pp. 185-189. (in Russian).

3. Koturova M. P. Linguistic identity. Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow, Flinta Publ., Nauka Publ., 2003, p.660. (in Russian).

4. Golovinova N. V. The nature of comparison in an individual author’s world picture by M. Lermontov (gender aspect). Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2011, no. 11 (113), pp.102–108 (in Russian).

5. Pankratova M. V. Dominant components of Inna Lisnyansky’s individual style (contrast, simile, comparison). Candidate of Philology, Thesis Summary. Moscow, 2009. 27 p. (in Russian).

6. Essays in the history of the XXth century Russian poetry language: experience of individual style description. Moscow, Naslediye Publ., 1995. 557 p. (in Russian).

7. Nekrasova E. A. Similies in lyrics (by Blok, Pasternak, Esenin). Linguistic processes in modern Russian poetry. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. pp. 11–188. (in Russian).

8. Lisnyanskaya I. Echo. Moscow, Vremya Publ., 2005. 648 p. (in Russian).

9. Kryuchkov P. Phenomenon of dream (on Inna Lisnyanskaya’s poetry). Arion, 2008, no. 1, pp. 21–25. (in Russian).

pankratova_m._v._175_178_10_138_2013.pdf ( 422.23 kB ) pankratova_m._v._175_178_10_138_2013.zip ( 416.68 kB )

Issue: 10, 2013

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: CURRENT PROBLEMS OF RUSSIAN STUDIES

Pages: 175 — 178

Downloads: 1332

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU