Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 10.02.2026
Home Issues 2014 Year Issue №4 COGNITIVE METAPHOR AS A METHOD OF LANGUAGE CATEGORIZATION OF THE SUN IN OLD ENGLISH AND OLD ICELANDIC POETIC TEXTS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

COGNITIVE METAPHOR AS A METHOD OF LANGUAGE CATEGORIZATION OF THE SUN IN OLD ENGLISH AND OLD ICELANDIC POETIC TEXTS

Sobolevskaya O.V.

Information About Author:

The article considers the language categorization of the sun in Old English and Old Icelandic poetic texts. Figurative (metaphoric) components which show the relation of the analyzed denotatum to the category of the animateness/inanimateness are revealed.

Keywords: Old English, Old Icelandic, category, categorization, cognitive metaphor, category of the animateness/inanimateness, sun

References:

1. Boldyrev N. N. Cognitive semantics: Course of lectures on English philology. Tambov, Izd-vo Tambovskogo in-ta Publ., 2000. 123 p. (in Russian).

2. Vinogradov V. A. Category of the animateness/inanimateness. Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow, So. Entsiklopediya Publ., 1990. P. 342. (in Russian).

3. Narushevich A. K. Category of the animateness/inanimateness in the light of the fi eld theory. Dis. cand. philol. sci. Taganrog, 1996. 163 p. (in Russian).

4. Osipova O. A. The refl ection of the category of the animateness/inanimateness in the declension of Old Germanic nouns. Abstract of Diss. Doc. Philol. sci. Moscow, 1987. 29 p. (in Russian).

5. Osipova О. А. The Interpretation of the Indo-European stem-building markers in the light of the Uralic languages data. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 1999, no. 4 (13), pp. 42-49. (in Russian).

6. Osipova О. А. Typology of Old Germanic noun declensions in the light of the Indoeuropean and Uralic languages. Tomsk, Tomskiy gosudarstvenniy pedagogicheskiy universitet Publ., 2007. 312 p. (in Russian).

7. Osipova О. А. The Basic for Interpretation of Ancient Indo-European Declensions. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2006, no. 4 (55), pp. 12–17. (in Russian).

8. George Lakoff, Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, London, The University of Chicago Press, 1980. (Rus.ed.: Lakoff G., Jonson M. Metaphory, kotorymi my zhiviem: per. s angl. / pod red. i s predisl. A. N. Baranova. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2004. 256 p.)

9. Boriskina О. О., Kretov А. А. Theory of language categorization. National language consciousness through the prism of cryptoclass. Voronezh, 2003. 211 p. (in Russian).

10. Kubryakova Е. S. Category. Brief dictionary of cognitive terms. Moscow, 1996. 248 p. (in Russian).

11. Meletinskiy Е. М. The general concept of myth and mythology. Mythological dictionary. Moscow, Sov. Entsiklopediya Publ., 1991. Pp. 653–658. (in Russian).

12. Beowulf. Edda. The Song of the Nibelungs. The Library of The World Literature. Series I. Vol. 9. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literature Publ., 1975. 752 p. (in Russian).

13. Pimenova М. V. On typical structural elements of the concepts of the inner world (based on the example of the concept SOUL). Language. Ethnos. World picture: Selection of scientifi c works. Ed. М. V. Pimenova. Kemerovo, Complex “Grafi ka” Publ., 2003. (Series “Conceptual studies”. Issue 1) pp. 28–39 (in Russian).

14. Pimenova М. V. Concept HEART: Image. Concept. Symbol. Kemerovo, KemGU Publ., 2007. 500 p. (Series “Conceptual studies”. Issue 9) (in Russian).

15. Edda. URL: http://norse.ulver.com/edda/ (accessed: 01.03.2013).

16. Cleasby R., Vigfusson G. An Icelandic-English Dictionary. Oxford, 1874. 888 p.

17. Labyrinth library: Old English literature. URL: http://www8.georgetown.edu/departments/medieval/labyrinth/library/oe/oe.html (accessed: 17.08.2013)

18. Bosworth J., Toller T. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. London, Oxford University Press, Amen House, 1954. 1302 p.

sobolevskaya_o._v._44_48_4_145_2014.pdf ( 440.85 kB ) sobolevskaya_o._v._44_48_4_145_2014.zip ( 435.29 kB )

Issue: 4, 2014

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: GERMANIC AND ROMANIC LANGUAGES

Pages: 44 — 48

Downloads: 1530

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU