Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 13.02.2026
Home Issues 2014 Year Issue №7 RELIGIOUS ARCHITECTURE: VISUAL AND SEMIOTIC ASPECTS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

RELIGIOUS ARCHITECTURE: VISUAL AND SEMIOTIC ASPECTS

Avanesov S.S.

Information About Author:

The author investigates a semiotic function of religious architecture. Sacred building (a temple) is a specific visual semiotic unit, fixing main religious and cultural content. The concept of “sacred place”, shifting from temple to the city, translates local historical meanings and related visual markers on a habitable environment in general. Methods of architectural design of sacral topos in the national culture are investigated on the example of the most important sacred buildings. Three semiotic paradigms of sacred meanings transfer in architecture are identified: the transfer of ideas, the image transfer and the copying.

Keywords: architecture, religion, culture, semiotic transfer

References:

1. Eco U. The Absent Structure. St. Petersburg, Symposium Publ., 2006. 544 p. (in Russian).

2. Buseva-Davydova I. L. Symbolic of architecture acording to Old Russian written sources of XI–XVII centuries. Hermeneutics of Old Russian literature. Issue 2. Moscow, 1989. Pp. 279–308 (in Russian).

3. Likhachev D. S. The great heritage: Classic works of literature of Old Russia. Moscow, Sovremennik Publ., 1979. 412 p. (in Russian).

4. Wagner G. K. Problem of genres in architecture of old Russia Architectural heritage, issue 36: Russian architecture. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1988. Pp. 3–21 (in Russian).

5. Lidov A. M. Hierotopy. Creation of sacred spaces as a form of creativity and a subject of cultural history. Hierotopy: Creation of Sacred Spaces in Byzantium and Medieval Russia. Moscow, Progress-Tradition Publ., 2006. Pp. 9–31 (in Russian).

6. Sazonova N. I. Visual text in religious rituals (data of Russian Orthodox worship).Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 9 (137), pp. 215–221 (in Russian).

7. Musin A. E. Lity and the formation of sacred space of Veliky Novgorod. Spatial Icons. Textual and performative: Proceedings of the International Symposium. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2009. Pp. 112–117 (in Russian).

8. Bondarenko I. A. Aesthetics of the old Russian town. Art and aesthetic culture of Old Russia XI–XVII century, ed. V. V. Bychkov. Moscow, 1996. Pp. 95–118 (in Russian).

9. Hilarion, Metropolitan. Word on Law and Grace. Moscow, Stolitsa Publ., Scriptoriy Publ., 1994. 146 p. (in Russian).

10. Vygolov V. P. Churches over the gates in old Russia (problems of evolution and origin). Monuments of Russian architecture and monumental art: Capital and province. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1994. Pp. 3–36 (in Russian).

11. Lebedev L., archpriest. Theology of the Russian Land. Moscow Patriarchal. Moscow, Veche Publ., 1995. Pp. 285–332 (in Russian).

12. Batalov A. L., Vyatchanina T. N. The ideological meaning and interpretation of the Jerusalem sample in Russian architecture ХVI–ХVII centuries. Architectural heritage, issue 36. Moscow, 1988. Pp. 22–42 (in Russian).

13. Buseva-Davydova I. L. About the ideological conception of the Patriarch Nikon’s “New Jerusalem”. Jerusalem in Russian culture. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1994. Pp. 174–181 (in Russian).

avanesov_s._s._59_64_7_148_2014.pdf ( 400.7 kB ) avanesov_s._s._59_64_7_148_2014.zip ( 394.37 kB )

Issue: 7, 2014

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES IN THE STUDY OF RELIGION

Pages: 59 — 64

Downloads: 1367

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU