Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 09.12.2025
Home Issues 2014 Year Issue №7 CRITICAL RECEPTION OF WOMEN'S LITERATURE IN THE CORRESPONDENCE OF GOETHE AND SCHILLER
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

CRITICAL RECEPTION OF WOMEN'S LITERATURE IN THE CORRESPONDENCE OF GOETHE AND SCHILLER

Burmistrova Svetlana Vladimirovna

Information About Author:

This article examines the critical reception of women's literature, presented in correspondence of Goethe and Schiller 1798–1801 years. In European literature the becoming of canon of critical reception of women-authors’ works occurs at the end of the XVIII century and is associated with the names of Goethe and Schiller. Women's literary works in perception of classics intersects with the notion of “literary dilettantism” and different characteristics such as subjectivity, “fluidity”, “grace”, etc. The study of the corpusof the texts represented in the domestic criticism of the first half of the XIX century, reveals the criteria for evaluating women's literature which are identical to the German, European canon.

Keywords: critical reception, women's literature, Goethe, Schiller, gender studies, literary dilettantism, female authorship, Russian-German literary interaction

References:

1. Econen K. Creator, subject, woman: women's writing strategy in the Russian Symbolism. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2011. P. 27 (in Russian).

2. Savkina I. L. “I am writing to myself...” Avtodokumentalnye female texts in Russian literature of the fi rst half of the XIX century. Tampere, 2001 (in Russian).

3. Ryutkenen M. Gender and literature: the problem of “women's writing” and “female reader”. Philology, 2000, no. 3. Pp. 5–17.

4. Sviyasov E. Sappho and “women's poetry” of the late XVIII – early XX centuries. Russian writer and literary process in the late XVIII – early XX centuries: Sat scientifi c articles, comp. M. Feinstein. Verlag F. K. Wilhelmshorst, 1995. Pp. 1–12.

5. Goethe. Schiller. Correspondence in 2 vol. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1988. Vol. 2 (in Russian).

6. Belinsky V. G. Victim. Literary sketch. Essay Ms. Monborn. Collected. Op.: In 13. T. 1. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1953 (in Russian).

7. Likhacheva E. Materials for the history of women's education in Russia. St. Petersburg, 1899. Part 1. 271 p. (in Russian).

8. Savkina I. L. Russian literature of the provincial women's prose 30–40-es XIX century. Wilhelmhost, 1998. P. 19 (in Russian).

9. Burmistrova S. V. Love and family issues in the Russian literature in the middle of XIX century. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2010, no. 8 (98), pp. 79–86 (in Russian).

10. Katkov M. Works in verse and prose Countess S. F. Tolstaya. Notes of the Fatherland, 1840, vol. 12, dep. 5, pp. 23–26 (in Russian).

11. Tatarkina S. V. Creativity of A.Ya. Panaeva in the literary context of the XIX century: the gender dimension. Dis. ... cand. phil. sci. Tomsk, 2006. p. 17 (in Russian).

burmistrova_s._v._141_145_7_148_2014.pdf ( 400.2 kB ) burmistrova_s._v._141_145_7_148_2014.zip ( 393.76 kB )

Issue: 7, 2014

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIAN NATIONAL WORLD-MAKING IN INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE

Pages: 141 — 145

Downloads: 1407

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU