TACTIC OF EXPLICATION OF DOUBT IN COOPERATIVE AND NONCOOPERATIVE SPEECH STRATEGIES (ON THE MATERIAL OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE)
In this article we consider such notions as “speech strategy” and “speech tactic”. Based on the Cooperative Principle and the Politeness Principle speech strategies are divided into cooperative and non-cooperative ones. We analyze the tactic of explication of doubt as a means of realization of speech strategies. Speech strategy is defined as a set of speech actions directed at achieving speaker’s goal. We prove that gaining liking from others, friendship’s support, acquiring information, consolation and calming other people strategies, realized by the tactic of explication of doubt, are cooperative ones. Defamation and persuasion strategies, realized by this tactic, are non-cooperative ones, while speech tactic is one or some speech actions which help to implement a strategy.
Keywords: speech strategy, speech tactic, the Cooperative Principle, the Politeness Principle, cooperative and non-cooperative strategies, tactic of explication of doubt
References:
1. Cristie A. Hickory Dickory Road. Iris Press, 2007. 320 p.
2. Gieson J. V. The Stolen Blue. New York: Penguin, 2000. 246 p.
3. Matveeva T. V. By linguistic theory genre. Collegium. Kiev, 1995. № 1–2. Pp. 65–71 (in Russian).
4. Rytnikova Ya. T. Harmony and disharmony in the open family conversation. Russian colloquial speech as a phenomenon of the urban culture. Ekaterinburg, 1996. Pp. 94–115 (in Russian).
5. Yym H. Ya. Pragmatics of speech communication. Theory and models of knowledge: Proceedings of the artifi cial intelligence. Tartu, 1985, pp. 196–207 (in Russian).
6. Issers O. S. Communication strategies and tactics of the Russian language. Moscow, Editorial URRS Publ., 2003, 248 p. (in Russian)
7. Grice G. P. Logic and verbal communication. New in foreign linguistics. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985. Issue 16, Linguistic Pragmatics. Pp. 217–237 (in Russian).
8. Leech G. H. Principles of pragmatics. New York, London: Longman, 1983. 250 p.
9. Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 352 p.
10. Berger C., Kellerman K. Acquiring social information. Strategic interpersonal communication. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994. Pp. 1–31.
11. Burleson B. R. The experience and effects of emotional support. URL: http://www.ffri.hr/~ibrdar/komunikacija/seminari/Burleson,%202003%20-%20Gender%20differences%20in%20emotional%20support.pdf (Accessed: 27 October 2013).
12. Demyankov V. Z. Interpretation of political discourse in the media. Language of media as an object of interdisciplinary research. Moscow, MGU Publ., 2003. Pp. 116–152 (in Russian).
13. Haily A. The Final Diagnosis. Doubleday & Co., Inc.; First Edition, 1979. URL: http: //www.e-reading.bz/chapter.php/70961/0/Hailey_-_The_Final_Diagnosis.html (Accessed: 24 July 2013).
14. Grigorieva V. S. Discourse as an element of the communication process: pragmatic and cognitive aspects. Tambov, TGTU Publ., 2007. 288 p. (in Russian).
15. Gutsal N. A. Semantic-pragmatic and discursive characteristics of the speech act “challenge”: on the material of English. Dis. cand. philol. sci. Volgograd, 2009. 209 p. (in Russian).
16. Shimberg S. S. Functional range of interrogative expressions in modern English discourse. Dis. cand. philol. sci. St. Petersburg., 1998. 167 p. (in Russian).
( 476.39 kB ) 
( 469.14 kB )
Issue: 10, 2014
Series of issue: Issue 10
Rubric: GERMANIC AND ROMANIC LANGUAGES
Pages: 39 — 45
Downloads: 1484