SOME PECULIARITIES OF CHULYM TURKIC VERB FORMATION IN THE CONTEXT OF SOUTH SIBERIAN TURKIC LANGUAGES (BY THE EXAMPLE OF +LA- DERIVATION FORMANT)
The Siberian indigenous languages of the Ob-Yenissey basin (including Ket, Khanty, Selkup, and Chulym Turkic) are highly endangered. They have no written standard, and some have never been taught at school. The phonetic system, inflectional morphology (including verb forms), lexical structure, and methods of nominal word formation of these languages have been the target of some linguistic studies. Nevertheless, numerous other aspects of these languages, like Chulym Turkic verb derivation, have not been the subject of a separate research. According to various linguistic classifications, Chulym Turkic dialects are close to those of Shor and Khakass, thus joining them in the group of South Siberian Turkic. Consequently, it is logical to assume the existence of various similarities in the verb derivation systems of these dialects. The given article views peculiarities of the Chulym Turkic +LA- suffix verb formation in the context of the South Siberian Turkic languages the following conclusion on the semantic components of this suffix is drawn: it signifies human actions (with tools, in an emotional state, with a certain purpose, or at a certain time), and ordinary processes in nature and animals.
Keywords: derivation; verb; Chulym Turkic, Tuvan, Shor, Khakass
References:
1. Lemskaya V. M. On Chulym Turkic word formation. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 10 (138), pp. 128–131 (in Russian).
2. Dul’zon A. P. Chulym Tatars and their language. Scholarly notes of Tomsk State Pedagogical Institute, vol. IX, 1952, pp. 76–211 (in Russian).
3. Dul’zon A. P. Kinship and relationship terms in languages of the Narym and Chulym regions. Scholarly notes of Tomsk State Pedagogical Institute, vol. XI., 1954, pp. 59–94 (in Russian).
4. Dul’zon A. P. Chulym Turkic verb forms of person and tense. Scholarly notes of Khakass research institute of language, literature, and history, vol. VIII. Abakan: Khakasskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo Publ., 1960. Pp. 101–145 (in Russian).
5. Dulzon A. P. Structure and history of Turkic languages. Ethnolinguistic differences of Turkic people of Siberia. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1971. 200 p. (in Russian).
6. Biryukovich R. M. Sound system of Chulym Turkic (a methodical manual). Moscow, 1979. 202 p. (in Russian).
7. Pomorska М. The Chulyms and their language. An attempt at a description of Chulym Phonetics and Nominal Morphology. Tьrk dilleri ara_t1rmalar1. Cilt II. 0stanbul: Kitap Matbaas1, 2001. Pp. 75–123.
8. Biryukovich R. M. Chulym Turkic morphology. Part I. The category of noun (methodical materials). Moscow, 1979. 91 p. (in Russian).
9. Biryukovich R. M. Chulym Turkic morphology. Part II. Saratov, Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo universiteta Publ., 1981. 184 p. (in Russian).
10. Biryukovich R. M. Chulym Turkic lexicon. A manual for special course. Saratov, Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo universiteta Publ., 1984. 88 p. (in Russian).
11. Pomorska M. Middle Chulym noun formation. Studia Turcologica Cracoviensia: 9. Krakуw: “Ksigarnia Akademicka”, Jagiellonian University, Institute of Oriental Philology, 2004. 256 p.
12. Baskakov N. A. Turkic languages (basic data and typological characteristics). USSR people’s languages. Vol. II. Turkic Languages. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1966. Pp. 7–42.
13. Schцnig C. A new attempt to classify the Turkic languages (1). Turkic Languages I. Berlin, 1997. Vol. 1. P. 117–133.
14. Bybee J. L. Morphology. A study of the relation between the meaning and form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1985. 235 p.
15. Esipova A. V. Word formation structure of a Turkic word: the derivational base (on the Shor material). Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2005, no. 4 (48), pp. 87–92 (in Russian).
16. Chispiakov E. F. A Shor language manual for teachers and students. Kemerovo, 1992. 318 p. (in Russian).
17. Clauson, Sir G. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth-Century Turkish. Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1972. 989 p.
18. Erdal M. Old Turkic Word Formation. A Functional Approach to the Lexicon. Vol. II. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1991. 469 p.
19. Biryukovich R. M. Materials in the Chulym Tatar language [fi eld notes]. Vol. III. Tegul’det, 1971. 658 p.
20. Boni R. A. Materials in the Chulym Tatar [fi eld notes]. Vol. VII. Tegul’det, 1973. 584 p.
21. Biryukovich R. M. The system of the Chulym Turkic language. Thesis doctor of philol. sci. Moscow, 1980. 404 p. (in Russian).
22. Dyrenkova N. P. Grammar of the Shor language. Moscow, 1941. 308 p. (in Russian).
23. Potseluevsky E. A. Grammar of the Khakass language. Moscow, 1975. 420 p. (in Russian).
24. Ischakov F. G., Palmbah A. A. Grammar of the Tuvan Language. Phonetics and Morphology. Moscow: Izdatvel’stvo vostochnoy literatury, 1961. 470 p. (in Russian).
25. Kolesnikova A. V. Affi xal verb formation in the Altaic language: in comparison with Old Turkic. Abstract of thesis candidate of philol. sci. Novosibirsk, 2004. 28 p. (in Russian).
( 485.19 kB ) 
( 478.54 kB )
Issue: 10, 2014
Series of issue: Issue 10
Rubric: FINNO-UGRIC, SAMOYED AND TURKIC LANGUAGES
Pages: 63 — 67
Downloads: 1544