Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 08.01.2026
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №1 IMAGE OF TEACHING PROFESSION AMONG THE FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS AS THE RESOURCE FOR INDIVIDUALIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

IMAGE OF TEACHING PROFESSION AMONG THE FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS AS THE RESOURCE FOR INDIVIDUALIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

Lukina A.K., Chiganova S.D.

Information About Author:

The article examines the results of research on the first-year students’ motives of choice of pedagogical profession and theirs ideas about the image of the ideal teacher. The choice of pedagogical profession is mainly accidental, only 8 % of those entered were not experience fluctuations with the selection of the professional education. Students’ ideas of pedagogical profession are not adequate, they do not contain representations about subjectivity of teacher in his professional activity, about his social mission and public destination, about the active, converting nature of his work. Describes some methods for self-determination of students, and building adequate ideas about the main features and competences of teachers. These are such methods as active seminars, business games, trainings, the analysis of concrete situations, practice in the schools under the management of experienced teachers. Such seminars develop reflexive abilities of students and critical attitude to their professional abilities. Shows that adequate image of the profession can serve the base of construction of individual educational programs of student.

Keywords: teacher, image of a professional, professionally important qualities; subjectivity; reflexive abilities

References:

1. Slobodchikov V. I., Isaev E. I. Psikhologiya razvitiya cheloveka [Psychology of the development of the man]. M., 2000 (in Russian).

2. Sartakova E. E., Vasilyeva O. V. Pedagogicheskie stereotipi professionalnoy deyatel’nosti uchitelya I problem attestatsii [Pedagogical stereotypes of the professional activity of teacher and the problems of the certifi cation]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, no. 13 (144) (in Russian).

3. Isaev E. I., Kosaretskiy S. G., Slobodchikov V. I. Stanovlenie i razvitie professional’nogo soznaniya budushchikh pedagogov [Becoming and the development of the professional consciousness of the future teachers]. Voprosy psikhologii, 2003, no. 3 (in Russian).

4. Raven D. Kompetentnost’ v sovremennom obshchestve: viyavlenie, razvitie i realizatsiya [Competence in the contemporary society: detection, development and the realization]. Moscow, Kogito-tsentr, 2002. 396 p. (in Russian).

5. Alekseeva E. E. Sopostavlenie tipologicheskikh svoystv budushchikh pedagogov i budushchikh psikhologov [Comparison of the typological properties of future teachers and future psychologists]. Gertsenovskie chteniya. Nachalnoe obrazovanie [The Hertsen discussions. The elementary education]. V. 3, issue 1. St. Petersburg, 2012. Pp. 335–339 (in Russian).

6. Lukina A. K. Formirovanie professionalnoy sub’ektnosty studentov v uchebnom protsesse VUZa [Formation of professional subjectivity of students in the training process of Institute of Higher Education]. Materialy IX mezinarodni vědecko – prakticka conference “Věda a vznik – 2012/2013”. Dil 20. Pedagogika: Praha. Publishing House “Education and Science”, p. 91–94 (in Russian).

7. Efl ova Z. B. Pozitsionirovanie pedagoga kak trebovanie i problema vnedreniya FGOS novogo pokoleniya [Positioning of the teacher as a requirement and the problem of the introduction of FGOS of the new generation]. Gertsenovskie chteniya.Nachalnoe obrazovanie [The Hertsen discussions. The elementary education]. V. 3, issue 1. St. Petersburg, 2012. Pp. 307–313 (in Russian).

lukina_a._k._38_42_1_154_2015.pdf ( 415.02 kB ) lukina_a._k._38_42_1_154_2015.zip ( 408.79 kB )

Issue: 1, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 1

Rubric: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHERS

Pages: 38 — 42

Downloads: 1297

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU