Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 12.02.2026
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №2 POWER/MYTH/HISTORIOGRAPHY : ONCE AGAIN ABOUT THE NECESSITY OF COMPARISON IN HISTORICAL RESEARCH
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

POWER/MYTH/HISTORIOGRAPHY : ONCE AGAIN ABOUT THE NECESSITY OF COMPARISON IN HISTORICAL RESEARCH

Mukhin O.N.

Information About Author:

The article deals with the problem of revision of the views and interpretations of the Russian history “hot” topics, based on non-scientific political and emotional factors, which is one of the manifestations of the society historical consciousness crisis. Particular attention is given to reduction of the level of critical attitude towards historical information caused by the spread of the Internet. On the example of the character of Ivan the Terrible it shows the necessity and possibility of findings’ verification in a situation of insufficient source base by successive application of historical-comparative method. Identifies the main methodological criteria to select objects and data sources for historical-comparative study.

Keywords: early modern times, Ivan IV the Terrible, monarchy, historiography, historical-comparative method

References:

1. Tolchev I. A. Prestuplenie, kotorogo ne bylo? O tragicheskoy sud'be syna Ivana Groznogo [Crimes which were not? On the tragic fate of Ivan’s the Terrible son]. Traditsionnye obshchestva: neizvestnoe proshloe : Materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 6–7 maya 2013 goda [Traditional societies: unknown past : Proceedings of the IX International scientific-practical conference on 6-7 May 2013]. Chelyabinsk: “Tsitsero” Publ., 2013, pp. 87–94 (in Russian).

2. Eliseev A. New look at the reign of Ivan the Terrible. Information and discussion portal “Newsland”. URL: http://newsland.com/news/detail/id/551216/ (accessed 10 September 2014) (in Russian).

3. Tyurin A. V. Owner section information. Maxim Moshkov Library. URL: http://fan.lib.ru/t/tjurin_a_w/about.shtml (accessed 10 September 2014) (in Russian).

4. Smirnov S. [Oprichny Brotherhood]. Spetsnaz Rossii, 2014, no. 11 (2017) URL: http://www.specnaz.ru/articles/191/8/1665.htm (accessed 9 October 2014) (in Russian).

5. Skuratov N. Ivan the Terrible – a look at the reign in terms of strengthening the Russian state. Portal “World History in Faces”. URL: http://vivl.ru/grozny/nskuratov.php (accessed 9 October 2014) (in Russian).

6. Belyy tsar’. Metafizika vlasti v russkoy mysli: hrestomatiya [White tsar. Metaphysics of power in Russian thought: reader]. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2001. 582 p. (in Russian).

7. Pervoe poslanie Ivana Groznogo Kurbskomu. Pervaya prostrannaya redaktsiya [First Epistle of Ivan the Terrible to Kurbsky. 1-st edition lengthy]. Perepiska Ivana Groznogo s Andreem Kurbskim [Correspondence of Ivan the Terrible with Andrew Kurbski]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1979. Pp. 12–52 (in Russian).

8. Florya B. N. Ivan Groznyy [Ivan the Terrible]. Moscow, Molodaya Gvardia Publ., 2003. 403 p. (in Russian).

9. Pleshkova S. L. Real’nosti i mify Varfolomeevskoy nochi [Reality and myths of Massacre of St. Bartholomew]. Voprosy istorii, 1998, no. 8, pp. 114–124 (in Russian).

10. Le Roy Ladurie E. L’État royal. De Louis XI à Henry IV (1460–1610). Paris: Hachette, 1987. 357 p. (Russ. ed.: Istoriya Frantsii. Korolevskaya Frantsiya. Ot Lyudovika XI do Genrikha IV. 1460–1610. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia Publ., 2004. 416 p.).

11. Letopisets 1619–1691 gg. [Chronicler of 1619–1691 years]. Polnoye sobranie russkikh letopisey [Complete Collection of Russian Chronicles]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1968. Vol. 31. Pp. 180–205 (in Russian).

12. Matveev A. A. Zapiski [Notes]. Rozhdenie imperii [The Birth of Empire]. Moscow, Fond Sergeya Dubova Publ., 1997. Pp. 359–414 (in Russian).

13. Zapiski Silvestra Medvedeva [Sylvester Medvedev’s Notes]. Zapiski russkikh ludey. Sobytiya vremen Petra Velikogo [Notes of the Russian people. Events of Peter the Great’s Times]. St. Petersburg, Tipografiya Sakharova Publ., 1841. Pp. 1–62 (in Russian).

14. Kocka J., Haupt H.-G. Comparison and Beyond: Traditions, Scope, and Perspectives Of Comparative History. Comparative and Transnational History. Central European Approaches and New Perspectives / ed. by J. Kocka and H.-G. Haupt. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2009. Pp. 1–30.

15. Istoriya Evropy: v 8 tomakh [The history of Europe: 8 vol.]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993. Vol. 3. 656 p. (in Russian).

16. Pyrenne H. Histoire de Belgique: 7 t. Bruxelles: M. Hamertin, 1923, t. III. 511 p.; 1927, t. IV. 497 p. (Russ. ed.: Niderlandskaya revolutsiya. Moscow, Gos. sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe izd-vo Publ., 1937. 572 p.) (in Russian).

17. Shtockmar V. V. Istoriya Anglii v srednie veka [History of England in the Middle Ages]. St. Petersburg, Aleteya Publ., 2005. 203 p. (in Russian).

18. Budur N. V. Povsednevnaya zhizn’ inkvizitsii v srednie veka [Daily life of the Inquisition in the Middle Ages]. Moscow, Molodaya Gvardia Publ., 2011. 374 p. (in Russian).

19. Andreev I. L. Alexey Mikhaylovich [Alexey Mikhailovich]. Moscow, Molodaya Gvardia Publ., 2006. 638 p. (in Russian).

20. Nikolaeva I. Yu. Polidistsiplinarnyy sintez i verifikatsia v istorii [Multidistsiplinary synthesis and verification in history]. Tomsk, Izd-vo Tom. Gos. un-ta Publ., 2010. 410 p. (in Russian).

21. Mukhin O. N. Absolutizm vs samoderzhavie: eshche raz k definitsii ponyatiy [Absolutism vs Samoderzhavie: once again to the definition of concepts]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, no. 2 (130), pp. 142–149 (in Russian).

22. Pavlenko N. I. Petr Velikiy [Peter the Great]. Moscow, Misl’ Publ., 1994. 591 p. (in Russian).

mukhin_o._n._84_91_2_155_2015.pdf ( 438.79 kB ) mukhin_o._n._84_91_2_155_2015.zip ( 430.49 kB )

Issue: 2, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: SOURCE AND HISTORIOGRAPHY

Pages: 84 — 91

Downloads: 1373

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU