Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 05.01.2026
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №2 ECOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION OF RATIONING OF ZINC AND CO PPER IN SOILS OF ARKHANGELSK
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

ECOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION OF RATIONING OF ZINC AND CO PPER IN SOILS OF ARKHANGELSK

Popova L.F., Nakvasina E.N.

Information About Author:

Northern (Arctic) Federal University Named After M. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk The article traces the limiting impact of zinc and copper in the soil-plant system, gives the scientific rationale and develops a regional system of environmental regulation of the content of heavy metals in soils of Arkhangelsk. Key points of comparison are concentrations of heavy metals in the soil, leading to a decrease in their accumulation (translocation) in plants, excess tissue in their maximum allowable concentrations and maximum allowable level, as well as the effect of the average soil phytotoxicity test applied to test-object (watercress). Critical level of these metals in the plant is achieved with a soil content of mobile forms of zinc at 5.0–13.0 mg / kg, copper – 2.0 mg / kg. This is below the maximum allowable concentration of mobile forms of heavy metals in soils of 1.5–1.8 times. Observes the decrease in the accumulation of zinc aerial parts of plants when the content in the soils of 45–50 mg / kg, copper – 4.2–5.2 mg / kg. There is a significant inverse relationship between phytotoxicity and content in the soils of zinc and copper. However, their concentration in the soil, leading to a moderate degree of phytotoxicity (30 %) accounted for zinc – 30 mg / kg for copper – 2.0 mg / kg, which is 1.3–1.5 times higher than the maximum allowable concentration mobile forms of heavy metals in soils. Based on regression analysis and comparison with regulatory measures adopted in Russia, has developed principles for the valuation of the regional conditions of the North. Set the concentration of total content and the content of mobile forms of zinc and copper, affecting the ecological status of grasses and soil phytotoxicity, picked averaged limiting concentration (total content and mobile forms) of these metals, which are soil polluters of Arkhangelsk.

Keywords: urban soils, zinc, copper, ecological condition grasses, soil phytotoxicity, limiting concentration

References:

1. Pochvy v biosfere i zhizni cheloveka: monografiya [Soils in the biosphere and human life: a monograph]. M.: VPO MGUL, 2012, 584 p. (in Russian).

2. Smagin A. V., Shoba S. A., Makarov O. A. Ekologicheskaya otsenka pochvennykh resursov i tekhnologii ikh vosproizvodstva (na primere g. Moskvy). [Environmental assessment of soil resources and technologies of reproduction (on the example of Moscow)]. Moscow: MGU Publ., 2008, 360 p. (in Russian).

3. Soils: Basic Concepts and Future Challenges. Cambridge University Press. 2006, 310 p.

4. Ladonin D. V., Karpukhin M. M. Vliyanie komponentov pochvy na pogloshchenie tyazhelykh metallov v usloviyakh tekhnogennogo zagryazneniya [Influence of soil components on the uptake of heavy metals in conditions of technogenic pollution]. Soil Science, 2008, no. 11, pp. 105–115 (in Russian).

5. Minkina T. Tyazhelye metally v pochvakh. Protsessy migratsii, transformatsii i akkumulyatsii [Heavy metals in soils. Processes of migration, transformation and accumulation: Monograph]. Germany. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing. 2011, 518 p. (in Russian).

6. Baybekov R. F., Savich V. I., Ovcharenko M. M., Gabbasova I. M., Afzalov R. Sh. Metody issledovaniya gorodskikh pochv: uchebnoe posobie [Methods of study of urban soils: a tutorial]. Moscow, FGOU VPO RGAU – MSHA im. K. A. Timiryazeva Publ., 2007, 202 p. (in Russian).

7. Matveev Yu. M., Popova I. V., Chernova O. V. Reglamentatsiya i normirovanie soderzhaniya khimicheskikh soedineniy v pochvakh (kontseptsiya i metodologiya ustanovleniya predel’no dopustimykh kontsentratsiy) [Regulation and standardization of chemical compounds in the soil (the concept and methodology of establishing maximum permissible concentrations)]. Okhrana okruzhayushchey prirodnoy sredy. Pochvy –

Environmental Protection. Soil. M., VNIIPrirody Publ., 2001, pp. 49–64. (in Russian).

8. Opekunov A. Yu. Ekologicheskoe normirovanie i otsenka vozdeystviya na okruzhayushchuyu sredu [Environmental regulation and assessment of environmental impacts]. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo SPb un-ta Publ., 2006, 260 p. (in Russian).

9. Shunel’ko E.V., Fedorova A. I. Ekologicheskaya otsenka gorodskikh pochv i vyyavlenie urovnya toksichnosti tyazhelykh metallov metodom biotestirovaniya [Environmental assessment of urban soils and identification of the level of heavy metal toxicity by the method of biotesting]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo universiteta. Farmatsiya. – Herald of the Voronezh University. Ser. Chemicals. Biology. Pharmacy. Voronezh, 2006, no 2, pp. 93–104 (in Russian).

10. Kolesnikov S. I., Kazeev K. Sh., Val’kov V. F. Ekologicheskoe sostoyanie i funktsii pochv v usloviyakh khimicheskogo zagryazneniya [Ecological condition and function of soil chemical pollution]. Rostov-on-Don, Izd Rosizdat Publ., 2006. 385 p. (in Russian).

11. Kolesnikov S. I., Kazeev K. Sh., Denisova T. V., Dadenko E. V. Razrabotka regional’nykh ekologicheskikh normativov soderzhaniya zagryaznyayushchikh veshchestv v pochvakh yuga Rossii [Development of regional environmental standards of contaminants in soils of southern Russia]. Nauchny Zhurnal KubGAU – Scientific Journal of KubGAU, 2012, no. 82 (08). URL: http://ej.kubagro.ru/2012/08/pdf/73.pdf (Accessed: 5 May 2014) (in Russian).

12. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po otsenke stepeni opasnosti zagryazneniya pochvy khimicheskimi veshchestvami [Guidelines for hazard assessment of soil contamination by chemicals]. Moscow: Izd-vo Minzdrav SSSR Publ., 1987, 25 p. (in Russian).

13. Popova L. F., Nikitina M. V., Nakvasina E. N. Khimicheskie elementy v pochvenno-rastitel’nom pokrove Arkhangel’ska: monografiya. Arkhangel’sk [Chemical elements in the soil-plant cover of Arkhangelsk: monograph]. Arkhangelsk, Izd-vo SAFU Publ., 2013, 146 p. (in Russian).

14. GOST 17.4.4.02–84. Okhrana prirody. Pochvy. Metody otbora i podgotovki pochv dlya khimicheskogo, bakteriologicheskogo i gel’mintologicheskogo analiza [The Nature Conservancy. Soil. Methods of sampling and preparation of soil for chemical, bacteriological and helminthological analysis.] Resolution of the USSR State Committee on Standards of 19.12.1984, no 4731. Moscow, Standart inform Publ., 2008, 8 p. (in Russian).

15. GOST 27262–87. Korma rastitel’nogo proiskhozhdeniya. Metody otbora prob. [Feed of plant origin. Sampling methods]. Resolution of the USSR State Committee on Standards of 30.03.1987, no 1073. Moscow, Izd-vo Standartov Publ., 2002, 9 p. (in Russian).

16. GN 2.1.7. 2511–09. Orientirovochno dopustimye kontsentratsii (ODK) khimicheskikh veshchestv v pochve. Gigienicheskie normativy [The approximate allowable concentration (APC) of chemicals in soil. Hygienic standards.]. Approved by the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation 18.05.2009, no. 32. Moscow, 2009. URL: http://www.complexdoc.ru (accessed 5 May 2014). (in Russian).

17. MU 2.1.7.730–99. Metodicheskie ukazaniya: Gigienicheskaya otsenka kachestva pochvy naselennykh mest: utv. [Guidelines: Hygienic evaluation of soil quality localities: approved]. Chief state sanitary doctor of Russia 07.02.1999: entry with effect from 05.04.1999. Moscow, 1999, 20 p. (in Russian).

18. Alexeenko V. A., Suvorinov A. V., Vlasova E. V. Metally v okruzhayushchey srede: pribrezhnye akval’nye landshafty Chernomorskogo poberezh’ya Rossii [Metals in the Environment: coastal aquatic landscapes of the Black Sea coast of Russia: monograph]. Moscow: Izd FGBNU “NII PMT” Publ., 2012, 360 p. (in Russian).

19. Sauerbeck D. Welche Swermetallgehalte in Pflazen dürfen überschritten wrden, um Wachstusbeeinträchtigungen zu vermeiden? [What Swermetallgehalte in dwelling plants may wrden exceeded in order to avoid Wachstusbeeinträchtigungen?]. Agricultural research, conference proceedings. 1982, no. 39, pp. 108–129 (in German).

20. Vremennyy maksimal’no dopustimyy uroven’ (MDU) soderzhaniya nekotorykh khimicheskikh elementov i gossipola v kormakh dlya sel’skokhozyaystvennykh zhivotnykh i kormovykh dobavkakh [Temporary maximum allowable level (MRL) content of some chemical elements and gossypol in farm animals’ feed and feed additives]. Approved by Chief Veterinary Gosagroprom USSR of 07.08.87, no 128–4/281. Moscow, 1987 (in Russian).

21. Allelopatiya rasteniy i pochvoutomlenie [Allelopathy of plants and pochvoutomlenie: Selected Works] / Ed. A. M. Grodzinski. Naukova Dumka, 1991, 429 p. (in Russian).

22. Fedorova A. I., Nikol’skaya A. N. Praktikum po ekologii i okhrane okruzhayushchey sredy [Workshop on ecology and environmental protection]. Moscow, Vlados Publ., 2001, 281 p. (in Russian).

23. Permogorskaya Yu.M. Pochvennyy pokrov kak komponent gorodskoy ekosistemy Arkhangel’ska: dis. kand. biol. nauk [Soil cover as a component of urban ecosystem of Arkhangelsk: dis. cand. biol. sci.]. Petrozavodsk, 2006, 167 p. (in Russian).

24. Titov A. F., Talanova V. V., Kaznina N. M., Laydinen G. F. Ustoychivost’ rasteniy k tyazhelym metallam [Plant resistance to heavy metals]. Petrozavodsk, Karel’skiy nauchniy tsentr Publ., 2007, 172 p. (in Russian).

25. Nakvasina E. N., Permogorskaya Yu. M., Popova L. F. Pochvy Arkhangel’ska. Strukturno-funktsional’nye osobennosti, svoystva, ekologicheskaya otsenka [Soil of Arkhangelsk. Structural and functional features, properties, environmental assessment: monograph]. Arkhangelsk, Izd-vo AGTU Publ., 2006, 124 p. (in Russian).

26. SanPin 2.1.7.1287–03. Pochva, ochistka naselennykh mest, bytovye i promyshlennye otkhody, sanitarnaya okhrana pochvy. Sanitarnoepidemiologicheskie

trebovaniya k kachestvu pochvy. [Soil, cleaning, household and industrial waste, soil sanitary protection. Sanitary requirements for the quality of the soil]. Approved by the Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation from 16.04.2003, no 53, approved changes 25.04.2007, no 20. Moscow, Minzdrav Rossii Publ., 2007, 14 p. (in Russian).

27. Upravlenie kachestvom gorodskikh pochv [Quality management of urban soils]. Ed. S. A. Shoby, A. S. Yakovlev. Moscow, MAKS Press, 2010, 96 p. (in Russian).

popova_l._f._156_163_2_155_2015.pdf ( 465.95 kB ) popova_l._f._156_163_2_155_2015.zip ( 457.57 kB )

Issue: 2, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: ECOLOGY AND SOIL SCIENCE

Pages: 156 — 163

Downloads: 1340

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU