Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 10.01.2026
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №4 COSMETOLOGICAL DISCOURSE: FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

COSMETOLOGICAL DISCOURSE: FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM

Vavilova E.N.

Information About Author:

This article covers and discusses one of the types of corporality discourses related to the body – that of cosmetological discourse which has not been considered before. Comparison of cosmetological, medical and advertising discourses helped to formulate the basic criteria for identifying cosmetological discourse as an independent phenomenon. In this article, we try to discover and analyze the characteristics of cosmetological discourse and the key concepts of this discourse: beauty, youth and health. This research helps to model the fragment of the discursive worldimage, in the descriptive and value aspects. This discourse was formulated in the cosmetological field of humans’ activities.

Keywords: corporality discourse, cosmetological discourse, medical discourse, advertising discourse

References:

1. Tupikova S. V. “Telesnost’” v sociologicheskom diskurse: obshchenauchnye i sotsiokul’turnye determinanty teoretizirovaniya [“Corporeality” in sociological discourse]. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem – Modern Research of Social Problems, no. 4 (24), 2013. DOI: 10.12731/2218–7405–2013–4–52 (in Russian).

2. Shesterikova O. A. Transformatsiya meditsinskogo diskursa v sovremennoy evropeyskoy kul’ture: dis. … kand. filos. пauk [The transformation of medical discourse in modern European culture: thesis of cand. phylos. sci.]. S.-Petersburg, 2014. 155 p. (in Russian).

3. Baudrillard J. Obshchestvo potrebleniya. Ego mify i struktury. Per. s fr. [The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures.] Moscow, Respublika; Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 2006. 269 р. (in Russian).

4. Glushkova T. S. Korrelyatsia ponyatiy “krasota” i “pol’za” v yazykovoy kartine mira (na materiale paremiologicheskih istochnikov, tekstov SMI I reklamy) [Correlation of notions “beauty” and “use” in the linguistic worldimage (on the material of paremiological sources, mass media texts and advertisements)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, no. 9 (150), pp. 9–12 (in Russian).

5. Kryuchkova N. V. Rol’ referentsii i kommunikatsii v kontseptoobrazovanii i issledovanii kontseptov: avtoref. dis. … dokt. filol. nauk. [The role of reference and communication in the forming of concepts and study concepts. Abstract of thesis doct. of philol. sci.] Saratov, 2009. 49 p. (in Russian).

6. Shmerlina I. A. Liberalizatsiya stareniya: teoreticheskie illyuzii i empiricheskie anomalii (Chast’ I) [The liberalization of aging: theoretical illusions and empirical anomalies (Part I)]. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mneniya [Monitoring of public opinion]. May-June 2013, no. 3 (115), pp. 165–175. (in Russian).

7. Filatova O. T. Kontent-analiz reklamnogo diskursa (na materiale reklamy kosmeticheskih kompaniy) [The content analysis of advertising discourse]. Lichnost’ – slovo – sotsyum. Mat-ly 6-y mezhdunar. nauchno-prakt. konf. [Personality – word – society. Materials of the 6th Intern. Scient. Conf.] Part 1. Minsk: “Parkur plus” Publ., 2006, pp. 8–14. (in Russian).

vavilova_e._n._124_126_4_157_2015.pdf ( 397.43 kB ) vavilova_e._n._124_126_4_157_2015.zip ( 391.06 kB )

Issue: 4, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE AND DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS

Pages: 124 — 126

Downloads: 1422

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU