Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 16.02.2026
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №4 COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS AND IT: TRYING TO FIND A COMMON LANGUAGE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS AND IT: TRYING TO FIND A COMMON LANGUAGE

Dobrova V.V., Zhuravlev A.P.

Information About Author:

This paper searches for the points of contact between cognitive linguistics and IT by drawing parallels between key concepts of cognitive linguistics and mathematical logics. The notions of metalanguage, object language and graph are considered not only as strictly logical concepts but as a tool that can be used to solve a range of interdisciplinary problems such as modeling the knowledge structure of a certain subject field. Since every natural language is both an object and a subject of cognition, such type of research seems to be essential in terms of modern level of computer technology and artificial intelligence. The paper also substantiates the reason to create interdisciplinary teams of software developers because such kind of intercommunication and cooperation between different areas of study seems to be vital to deal with the problems of modern educational and testing issues.

Keywords: concept, category, metalanguage, object language, graph

References:

1. Kubryakova E. S. O meste kognitivnoy lingvistiki sredi drugih nauk kognitivnogo tsikla i o ee roli v issledovanii protsessov kategorizatsii i konzeptualizasii mira [On place of cognitive linguistics among other cognitive studies and on its role in research of conceptualization and categorization processes]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka – Cognitive study of language, 2006, no. 7, pp. 15–19 (in Russian).

2. Krasnov A. N., Sloeva E. A., Zhuaravlyov A. P., Zhirov V. V., Moshkov I. S. Zadacha cognitivnogo modelirovaniya semantiki predmetnoy oblasti i teoriya grafov [Problem of the subject field semantics modeling and graph theory]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka – Cognitive study of language, 2013, no. 14, pp. 195–200 (in Russian).

3. Krasnov A. N., Zhuravlyov A. P., Sloeva E. A. Problemy ideograficheskoy reprezentatsii semantiki svobodnyh vyskazyvaniy taksonomicheskogo tipa [Problems of ideographic representation of taxonomic-type expressions semantics]. Izvestiya Samarskogo naychnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk – Bulletin of Samara scientific center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2013, no. 15, pp. 453–458 (in Russian).

4. Krasnov A. N., Zhuravlyov A. P., Sloeva E. A. Kognitivno-kommunikativnyy podhod k otsenke svobodnyh otvetov studentov [Cognitive and communicative approach to evaluation of students’ free-form answers]. Metodologicheskiye i lingvisticheskiye voprosy yazyka dlya spetsial’nyh tseley – Methodological and linguistic issues of language for special purposes (LSP), 2013, pp. 83–87 (in Russian).

5. Wikipedia. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Метаязык (Accessed: 27 November 2014) (in Russian).

6. Wikipedia. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Металогика (Accessed: 27 November 2014) (in Russian).

7. Natsionalnaya Entsiklopedicheskaya sluzhba [National encyclopedic service]. URL: http://www.terme.ru/dictionary/879/word/metajazyk (Accessed: 01 December 2014) (in Russian).

8. Boldyrev N. N. Kognitivnaya lingvistika v Rossii: ot chastnyh issledovaniy – k obshchey teorii yazyka [Cognitive linguistics in Russia: from individual research to general theory of language]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka – Cognitive study of language, 2013, no. 14, pp. 52–59 (in Russian).

9. Tsyrenova A. B. O sredstvah realizatsii ssenarnogo konsepta (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [Means of realization of the scenario concept]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, vol. 3 (131), pp. 18–21 (in Russian).

10. Biblioteka Zinki.ru. URL: http://zinki.ru/book/kognitivnaya-lingvistika/ponyatie-konceptosfery (Accessed: 02 March 2015) (in Russian).

11. Kotorova E. G. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskoe pole kak metod kompleksnogo opisaniya sposobov realizatsii rechevyh aktov [Communicativepragmatic field as a method of comprehensive description for means of speech acts realization]. Tomskiy zhurnal lingvisticheskih I antropologicheskih issledovaniy – Tomsk Journal of linguistics and anthropology, 2013, no. 1, pp. 58–67 (in Russian).

12. Abisheva K. M. Kategorizatsiya i ee osnovnye printsipy [Categorization and its basic principles]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki – Issues of cognitive linguistics, 2013, no. 2, pp. 21–30 (in Russian).

dobrova_v._v._127_130_4_157_2015.pdf ( 411.63 kB ) dobrova_v._v._127_130_4_157_2015.zip ( 404.9 kB )

Issue: 4, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE AND DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS

Pages: 127 — 130

Downloads: 1356

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU