Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 13.02.2026
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №4 BINARY ALL USION AS A MEANS OF EXPRESSING A CONCEPT (DATA OF ENGLISH)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

BINARY ALL USION AS A MEANS OF EXPRESSING A CONCEPT (DATA OF ENGLISH)

Kovalenko E.N., Petrochenko L.A.

Information About Author:

The article deals with the peculiarities of using an allusion as one of the means of expressing concepts. An allusion is defined as the mention of the name of a real person, literary character, or historical event which conjures up some extra meaning in new contexts. In accordance with the properties of the person, character, or event, one allusion can represent several concepts in their peripheral fields. The article describes the research data in this area with special emphasis on binary allusions which can be analyzed in discrete and syncretic aspects. Every member of the binary allusion, as a rule, is specifically related to one or another of the concepts, while the two members taken together demonstrate additional conceptual relations characteristic only of their binary usage.

Keywords: concept, binary allusion, background knowledge, discreteness, syncretism

References:

1. Evans V. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Salt Lake City: The Univ. of Utah Press, 2007. 239 p.

2. Privalova I. V. Interkul’tura i verbal’ny znak (lingvokognitivnyye osnovy mezhkul’turnoy kommunikatsii) [Interculture and the Verbal Sign (Linguocognitive Basis of Intercultural Communication)]. Moscow, Gnosis Publ., 2005, 472 p. (in Russian).

3. Petrochenko L. A. O formirovanii slovarnogo zapasa uchashchikhsya (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [On the Formation of Students’ Vocabulary (Data of English)]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoe obozrenie – Pedagogical Review: Scientific Journal. Tomsk, 2013, issue 2 (2), pp. 70–75 (in Russian).

4. Kotorova E. G. Kommukativno-pragmaticheskoye pole kak metod kompleksnogo opisaniya sposobov realizatsii rechevykh aktov [Communicative-Pragmatic Field as a Method of Comprehensive Description for Means of Speech Acts Realization]. Tomskiy zhurnal lingvisticheskikh I antropologicheskikh issledovaniy – Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, 2013, no. 1 (1), pp. 58–67 (in Russian).

5. Petrochenko L. A. Allyuziya kak komponent slovarey klyuchevykh kontseptov [Allusion as a Component of Key Concepts Dictionaries]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnikh I fundamental’nykh issledovaniy – International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. Moscow, 2013, no. 4, pp. 108–110 (in Russian).

6. BNC – The British National Corpus. URL: http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk

7. The Oxford Dictionary of Allusions. Comp. by A. Delahunty, Sh. Dignen, P. Stock. Oxford, Oxf. Univ. Press, 2001. 453 p.

8. The Wordsworth Dictionary of Quotations. Ed. by C. Robertson. Ware, Wordsworth Ed., 1997. 740 p.

9. Holder R. W. How not to say what you mean: A dictionary of euphemisms. Oxford, Oxf. Univ. Press, 2002. 501 p.

10. Manser M. H. The Facts On File Dictionary of Classical and Biblical Allusions. New York, Facts On File, Inc., 2003. 448 p.

11. Sollars M. D. Dictionary of Literary Characters. New York, Facts On File, Inc., 2011. 2528 p.

kovalenko_e._n._137_141_4_157_2015.pdf ( 408.08 kB ) kovalenko_e._n._137_141_4_157_2015.zip ( 401.21 kB )

Issue: 4, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE AND DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS

Pages: 137 — 141

Downloads: 1227

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU