Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 15.02.2026
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №4 ARCHITECTURAL DISCOURSE AND ITS SPEECH GENRE FORMS IN PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION (BASED ON FRENCH LANGUAGE)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

ARCHITECTURAL DISCOURSE AND ITS SPEECH GENRE FORMS IN PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION (BASED ON FRENCH LANGUAGE)

Kositskaya F.L., Zaitseva I.E.

Information About Author:

Communication in the professional sphere such as architecture has a multiaspect characteristic and national specific nature. In this article the object under study is the French architectural discourse and the subject is its speech genre differentiation. The French architectural discourse is a formation with a complicated structure resulting from the interaction of various discourses e. g. architectural (planning and design), scientific, academic, legal (administrative), legislative, journalistic, advertising. Within the subgroup of the French architectural discourse one can find the polyphonic inclusions, disseminations of those belonging to history, the study of art, medicine, theatre, sport, cookery and etc. The complicated nature of the French architectural discourse has given birth to a variety of speech genre forms (nearly a hundred speech genres) and functional styles. The architectural vocabulary includes not only terminology but also metaphorical figurativeness.

Keywords: architectural discourse, speech genre, functional style, professional communication

References:

1. Arutyunova N. D. Diskurs // Bol’shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’. Yazykoznanie [Discourse // Large encyclopedia. Linguistics]. Moscow. 1998. pp. 136–137 (in Russian).

2. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [The language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2002. 477 p. (in Russian).

3. Makarov M. L. Osnovy teorii diskursa [Discourse theory foundations] Moscow: ITDGK “Gnozis” Publ., 2003. 280 p. (in Russian).

4. Dejk T. A. van. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiya [Language, Cognition. Communication]: transl. from English. Blagoveshchensk, Blagoveshchenskiy gumanitarnyy kolledzh Publ., 2000. 308 p. (in Russian).

5. Simonenko M. A. Arhitekturnaya metafora v yazyke i rechi: аvtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [An architectural metaphor in language and speech: Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. Kursk, 2009. 24p. (in Russian).

6. Kositskaya F. L. Zhanrovaya palitra frantsuzskogo turisticheskogo diskursa [A palette of speech genres of the French tourist discourse]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin. 2013. no. 3. (131). pp.192–195 (in Russian).

7. Stamatiadu E. Leksiko-semanticheskie, strukturnye i funktsionalnye osobennosti arhitekturnoy leksiki: аvtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Lexicosemantic, structural and functional features of the architectural vocabulary: Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. Maykop, 2010. 24p. (in Russian).

8. Vasilieva S. L. Antroponimicheskie metafory v gazetno-publitsisticheskom diskurse: funktsional’ny aspekt [Anthroponomical metaphors in the journalistic discourse: the functional aspect]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin. 2013, no. 3, (131), pp. 157–160 (in Russian).

kositskaya_f._l._142_147_4_157_2015.pdf ( 438.04 kB ) kositskaya_f._l._142_147_4_157_2015.zip ( 429.65 kB )

Issue: 4, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE AND DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS

Pages: 142 — 147

Downloads: 1292

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU