Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 14.02.2026
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №7 VOCATIONAL TRAINING FEATURES OF COSTUME DESIGNERS IN MODERN HIGHER EDUCATION CONDITIONS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

VOCATIONAL TRAINING FEATURES OF COSTUME DESIGNERS IN MODERN HIGHER EDUCATION CONDITIONS

Kadiyeva N.V.

Information About Author:

Specificity of costume designer’s professional activity is harmonious combination of the aesthetic and utilitarian aspects. The aesthetic aspect, associated with the creation of positive emotions, expressive aesthetic, artistic imagery, has traditionally been the dominant in Russian design education. Modern condition of Russian clothing industry requires deposing the costume designer’s professional competence towards creating useful qualities of the object. The article discusses the possible reasons of the aesthetic and utilitarian aspects imbalance. Also the author proposes some ways of organizing and content of practical training, which will help to restore the right balance between aesthetic and utilitarian components in our design education. Special attention is devoted to the problem of organizing the industrial practice for fashion designers. The author emphasizes the teacher’s role and the role of his own fashion design practical experience in the formation of costume designer’s professional competencies.

Keywords: bachelor, design education, design activity methods of vocational training, industrial practices

References:

1. Коvеshniкоvа N. А. K voprosu o modeli podgotovki spetsialista dizaynera na osnove kompetentnostnogo podkhoda [On the problem of model of specialist designer training on competency-based approach]. Evropeyskiy zhurnal sotsial’nykh nauk – European social science journal. Riga – Moscow, 2011, no. 10 (13), pp. 181–188 (in Russian).

2. Коzhukhоvsкаya S. М. Dizayn kostyuma – odna iz spetsializatsiy podgotovki professional’nogo pedagoga [Costume Design – one of the specialties of vocational teacher training]. Vestnik UMO po professional’no-pedagogicheskomu obrazovaniyu – Bulletin of Educational and methodical association on vocational education. Specialized issue of “Design education.” Yekaterinburg, 2007. No. 2 (41), pp. 126–130 (in Russian).

3. Novikova Ya. V. Prakticheskaya komponenta v teoreticheskoy podgotovke dizaynerov-bakalavrov [The practical component of theoretical disciplines for training bachelors (designers)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, no. 13, pp. 30–32 (in Russian).

4. Тоmitsкаya S. U. Vliyaniye praktikoorientirovannogo podkhoda v protsesse podgotovki dizaynerov na ikh vospriyatiye i postroeniye sovremennogo formoobrazovaniya [The impact of practice approach in the preparatory process of designers on their perception and construction of modern formation]. Materialy mezhregional’noy nauchno-praktichskoy konferentsii “Problemy povysheniya kachestva podgotovki dizaynerov” [Materials of the Interregional Scientific and Practical Conference “Problems of improving the quality of training of designers”]. Vladivostok, 2010. Pp. 113–114 (in Russian).

5. Kuz'mina O. V. Metody formirovaniya konstruktorskoy gotovnosti dizaynera, realizuyushchiye trebovaniya FGOS VPO [Formation methods of designer readiness, realizing the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education]. Materialy mezhregionalnoy nauchno-praktichskoy konferentsii “Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya vysshego obrazovaniya na sovremennom etape” [Materials of International scientific and practical conference “Problems and prospects of higher education at the present stage”]. Electrostal, 2010. Pp. 124–127 (in Russian).

6. Sidorenko V. F., Ustinov A. G. Analiz opyta podgotovki dizaynerov v vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniyakh. Organizatsiya i soderzhaniye protsessa podgotovki dizaynerov: Otchet o nauchno-issledovatel’skoy rabote [Analysis of experience in designers training in higher education institutions. The organization and content of the preparatory process for designers: Report on research work]. Metodicheskiye materialy VNIITE [Methodical materials of All-Russian Research Institute of Technical Aesthetics]. Moscow, VNIITE Publ., 1987 (in Russian).

7. Tkachenko E. V., Tkachenko A. V., Klimov V. P. Dizayn-obrazovaniye: kontseptual’nye versii [Design education: conceptual version]. Obrazovaniye i nauka – Education and Science, 2000, no. 1, pp. 94–100 (in Russian).

8. Grashin A. A. Dizayn-obrazovaniye v Rossii – sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy razvitiya: kachestvo zhizni i obrazovaniye [Design education in Russia – modern condition and prospects of development: quality of life and education]. Moscow, VNIITE Publ., 2005. No. 13 (in Russian).

9. Norman, Don. [Why design education must change]. Core 77, 2010, no 26, URL: http://core77.com/blog/columns/why_design_education_must_change_17993.asp (accessed 04 April 2014)

10. FGOS VPO po napravleniyu 0725000 Dizayn (kvalifikatciya (stepen’) bakalavr). Prilozheniye k prikazu ministra ot 22 dekabrya 2009 g.№ 780 “Ob utverzhdenii i vvedenii v deystviye Federal’nogo gosudarctvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta vysshego professional’nogo obrazovaniya po napravleniyu 0725000 Dizayn (kvalifikatciya (stepen’) “bakalavr”) [Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education in the direction training 072500 Design (qualification (degree) Bachelor). Annex to the order of the Minister. December 22, 2009 no. 780 “On approval and enactment of the federal state educational standards of higher professional education in the field of training design 072500 (qualification (degree)” BS”)], electronic version, 2012, р. 11. URL: http://www.mosirt.ru/docs/fgos/072500_Design.pdf (accessed 20 March 2013).

kadiyeva_n._v._102_106_7_160_2015.pdf ( 337.81 kB ) kadiyeva_n._v._102_106_7_160_2015.zip ( 331.05 kB )

Issue: 7, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: VOCATIONAL TRAINING AT HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION

Pages: 102 — 106

Downloads: 1374

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU