Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 14.02.2026
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №12 IMPORTANCE OF FOLKLORE PRACTICE IN THE TRAINING OF BACHELOR STUDENTS OF PEDAGOGY WITH EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM SPECIALIZATION IN LITERATURE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

IMPORTANCE OF FOLKLORE PRACTICE IN THE TRAINING OF BACHELOR STUDENTS OF PEDAGOGY WITH EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM SPECIALIZATION IN LITERATURE

Tchernyavskaya Y.O.

Information About Author:

The article analyses the final reports of bachelors of the Faculty of History and Philology of the Tomsk State Pedagogical University on educational folklore practice. The author shows that educational folklore practice develops ability to come into contact with people; teaches to develop any forms of cooperation; brings up respect to folk art. The difference of educational practice for bachelors consists in that the students should draw up the final report representing the analysis of all kinds of activity: methods, ways of achievement of tasks; connection of practice with the theoretical course; conclusions about the results of practice and about the prospect of further work; offers and recommendations about the organization of practice. Works of the majority of students testify to their readiness for independent research work and can become a basis of a scientific article or a course work. As a whole, folklore training of 2015 passed successfully. Students received experience as collectors of folklore, learnt to come into contact with bearers of folklore, deepened their theoretical knowledge in the subject “Oral folk arts”, learnt to make reports according to new requirements of Federal State Education Standards, to search and review the literature on the topic, acquired skills of research work and participating in conferences.

Keywords: folklore practical training, oral folk arts, children folklore, Federal State Education Standards, analysis of folklore

References:

1. Koordinatsionnyy sovet uchebno-metodicheskikh ob’’edineniy i nauchno-metodicheskikh sovetov vysshey shkoly [Coordinating committee of learning and teaching associations and methodological councils in higher education]. URL: http://fgosvo.ru/fgosvpo/7/6/1 (accessed 27 April 2015) (in Russian).

2. Cheshuina T. G. Formirovaniye professional’no-pedagogicheskoy kompetentnosti studentov pedvuzov v period proizvodstvennoy (pedagogicheskoy praktiki) [Forming of professional pedagogical competence of students of pedagogical higher schools in the period of practical training]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2004, vol. 5 (42), pp. 184–188 (in Russian).

3. Otlichitel’nye osobennosti FGOS VPO tret’ego pokoleniya [Distinctive characteristics of the third generation Federal State Education Standards] URL: www.msmsu.ru/… /Otlihitelqnye_osobennosti_FGOS_VPO_tretqego_pok… (accessed 5 April 2015) (in Russian).

4. Mednikova O. N. Tekhnologiya razvitiya kriticheskogo myshleniya cherez chteniye i pis’mo kak sredstvo razvitiya refl eksivnoy deyatel’nosti uchashchikhsya. [Technology of the development of critical thinking through reading and writing as a means of development of student’s’refl ective activity]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2015, vol. 6 (159), pp. 17–20 (in Russian).

chernyavskaya_y._o._125_128_12_165_2015.pdf ( 388.58 kB ) chernyavskaya_y._o._125_128_12_165_2015.zip ( 382.69 kB )

Issue: 12, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 12

Rubric: HIGHER SCHOOL PEDAGOGY

Pages: 125 — 128

Downloads: 1234

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU