Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 09.02.2026
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №3 LOGICAL-LINGUISTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF DEFINITIONS IN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

LOGICAL-LINGUISTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF DEFINITIONS IN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE

Murtazina P.A.

Information About Author:

The article discusses the problem of definition in logics and investigates the role of it in management discourse based on academic textbooks. Describes applied research problems and paradox of definition analysis. The author introduces the concept of definition and identifies its types and characteristic features. The understanding of the definition content is formed due to logical systematization and classification. Distinguishes and describes nominal and real, explicit (classical, functional) and implicit (inductive, ostensive) definitions. Gives the techniques, similar to definitions (description, characterization, explanation, comparison and differentiation), defines their didactic purpose. The study provides linguistic realizations of definitions from academic texts, reveals common logical mistakes of definitions.

Keywords: Applied research, management discourse, definition, paradox of analysis, classification of definitions, characteristics

References:

1. Kirillov V. I., Starchenko A. A. Logika: uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov [Logics: textbook for colleges of law]. Ed. prof. V. I. Kirillov. Izd. 6-e, pererab. i dop. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2008. 240 p. (in Russian).

2. Andreeva G. M. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya. Uchebnik dlya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy [Social psychology. Textbook for higher educational institutions]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2001. 290 p. (in Russian).

3. Kotyurova M. P. Ob ekstralingvisticheskikh osnovaniyakh smyslovoy struktury nauchnogo teksta (Funktsional’no-stilisticheskiy aspekt) [On extralinguistic bases of academic text structure (Functional-stylistic aspect)]. Krasnoyarsk, 1988. 170 p. (in Russian).

4. Whitehead A., Russell B. Principia Mathematica: in 3 vol. Second Ed. Cambridge, 1963. XLVI +674 p.

5. Surovyagin D. P. Paradoks opredeleniya v deduktivnoy teorii [The Paradox of Defi nition in the Deductive Theory]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya “Filosofi ya”. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika – Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series Philosophy, Psychology, Pedagogy, 2014, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 51–54 (in Russian).

6. Karnap R. Znacheniye i neobkhodimost’ [Meaning and necessity]. Moscow, 1959. 383 p. (in Russian).

7. Kurbatov V. I. Logika v voprosakh i otvetakh [Logics in questions and answers]. Rostov-on-Don, 1997. 386 p. (in Russian).

8. Kurbatov V. I. Logika: ucheb. posobiye dlya studentov vuzov [Logics: textbook for college students]. Rostov-on-Don, 1997. 384 p. (in Russian).

9. Voyshvillo E. K., Degtyarev M.G. Logika: ucheb. dlya vuzov [Logics: textbook for higher educational institutions]. Moscow, 1998. 505 p. (in Russian).

10. Daft R. Management. Soth Western Cengage Larning, 2012 (Russ. ed.: Daft. R. Menedzhment: per. s angl. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2013. 656 p.).

11. Gerchikova I. N. Menedzhment [Management]: 4 ed., pererab. i dop. Moscow, 2010. 512 p. (in Russian).

12. Kvashevich V. B. Analiz ponyatiya “opredeleniye” v diskurse (logicheskiy aspect) [Discourse analysis of the concept “defi nition” (logical aspect)]. Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Ser. “Filologiya i iskusstvovedeniye” – The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 58–62 (in Russian).

murtazina_p._a._59_62_3_168_2016.pdf ( 407.79 kB ) murtazina_p._a._59_62_3_168_2016.zip ( 401.97 kB )

Issue: 3, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS

Pages: 59 — 62

Downloads: 1306

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU